“Vande Mataram” chants at the JPSC protests in Jharkhand.
No violence. No vandalism. No abuses. Just students peacefully protesting over their grievances.
Yet, don’t expect the usual outrage. The selective silence is telling, perhaps because this is happening in a non-BJP-ruled state.
This is Ranchi, Jharkhand. Students are protesting against irregularities in exams in the state.
The crowd is large too, but since it's not against the BJP, peaceful and non-abusive, it's not getting the due attention.
#RuchikaSingh Lets understand what is happening. It seems that there are two #RuchikaSinghs.
I have simply taken Two photographs Which were available On the Internet. I then asked the AI to generate similarities and differences between the two images.
The following are the results #MEDIA AND @noidapolice .
1. Estimated Age & Proportions (Assessment)
Subject A (Image 12, Left): Shows full adult skeletal maturity. Features are developed and defined. There is clear facial definition and skeletal structure.
Estimated Age Range: Mid-to-Late 20s.
Subject B (Image 13, Right): Shows pedomorphic (child-like) features, consistent with a pre-pubertal or early-pubertal stage. Features are softer, rounder, and have significant soft-tissue fullness, especially in the mid-face/cheeks. The jaw is not yet fully developed and defined.
Estimated Age Range: Early Adolescence (approx. 10–13 years).
The visualization effectively separates these two distinct developmental stages, showing that Subject A cannot be an older version of Subject B due to fundamental structural growth patterns, even over time.
Point-by-Point Difference Analysis (Anatomical Detail)
The visualizations in this section use illustrative metrics and tracing to compare stable features directly. These points are not explained by age or makeup.
2. The Ocular Region (Eyes & Sockets)
Subject A: Displays almond-shaped eyes that are set deeper. Subject A shows full adult bone development of the brow ridge, providing structure.
Subject B: Display rounder, closer-set eyes. Subject B shows less development in the orbital bone structure, consistent with young age.
Key Visible Difference: The distance between the inner corners of the eyes (intercanthal distance) is fundamentally different, and the bone structure of the orbital socket itself shows a different shape and projection.
3. The Nasal Morphology
Subject A: Displays a defined nasal bridge with a specific, narrower width. The nostril flare has specific definition and shape.
Subject B: Displays a wider nasal bridge and less defined nostril structure, consistent with less mature skeletal structure.
Key Visible Difference: The width of the nasal bridge and the shape/definition of the nostrils cannot be accounted for by maturation or simple variance.
4. The Auricular Morphology (Ears)
This is a critical area, as ears do not significantly change structure after early childhood and are a highly persistent feature.
Subject A: Displays prominent ears with significant lateral projection (flare) from the head. The structure of the helical rim and the ear lobe is distinct, showing a 'detached' or free lobe structure. (See Ear Detail in Image 10 analysis for a parallel).
Subject B: Displays ears that lie flatter and appear attached. The structure and orientation of the folds are fundamentally different.
Key Visible Difference: The structure and attachment of the ear lobes are not a result of development. Subjects display fundamentally different ear morphology.
5. Dental/Oral Formation
Subject A: Displays unique teeth formation and alignment. The visualization in Image 14 points to specific patterns, including crowding or rotation in the maxillary arch. These unique markers provide a high-confidence identifying signature.
Subject B: Displays a smooth dental arch with no complex visible features.
This is not a key differentiator for different people because B could have later dental work, but the highly distinct formation of Subject A is a potent identifier signature.
@ravishndtv@dhruv_rathee@NitishRajput@TheLallantop@ajitanjum@abhisar_sharma@BDUTT@ShekharGupta@TheDeshBhakt@ppbajpai@AajTak@ndtv@IndiaToday@ABPNews@ZeeNews@republic@TimesNow@News18India@indiatvnews@news24tvchannel@ANI@PTI_News@ians_india@NewsX
Why No Pizza, No bread pakoda, No burger at Jharkhand student's protest ?
Because they are real students and not getting any funding to protest.
They don't even have plates to eat.
But no liberals are crying for them on Instagram 🤡
Her mother said in the interview that she has two daughters, so the girl apologizing is probably the younger one.
Her parents most likely forced her to make the apology video to protect the elder daughter, who is a minor or looks like one.
The girl on the right is clearly not 15. This case should still be pursued to identify those guys who instigated her or her sister into the abusive sloganeering.
I’m 100% sure the names of Bauna Dipke, Gay Dass, or Chunal Kamra will surface.
The case should be pursued to find the Umar Khalid of this protest.
Huge protest by students in Jharkhand against paper leak..
Every passing day number of students on the streets are increasing....
Students in Jharkhand demand resignation of Education Minister!
There is Congress lead alliance govt in Jharkhand!
Both girls aren't same.... It seems Ecosystem planned it to play minor victim card and use it against BJP.
Police should investigate, not to punish her but to bring out the truth...
Reporter: Will CJP do something about massive numbers of student protesting in Jharkhand on paper leak?
Abhijeet dipke: We don't want to do anything in hurry or about every issue, we don't have solution of everything!
What a hypocrite Cockroach!!
मैंने दोस्तों के साथ खा पी लिया था, तब मोदी जी को गाली दिया था, मुझे माफ कर दो, मेरे रिश्ते टूट रहे हैं?
अब इनका क्या होगा... भरमार है ऐसे माफी वाले वीडियो की-😀
Pradeep: "You're getting more touchey than Sonia herself."
Ashutosh: "PM is touchey. Had someone said JERSEY COW to my mother, I would've SMASHED him"
Pradeep: "Haan! When it comes to your own mother, abusing gets SMASHED.
— But for PM, it is TOUCHY."🤣🔥
Mahua, just four months ago, you sent 13 policemen from Krishnanagar to arrest & intimidate me for quoting a tweet about you. Instructed them to create a nuisance in my neighbourhood to sully my image.
You slapped 12 non-bailable FIRs on me, which were quashed by the High Court
Karnataka Congress registers FIRs against 3 Instagram users in Bengaluru for “objectionable posts” on Rahul Gandhi
But “Students Should Not Be Hounded?”