intelpocik

Degen | Content Creator | Vibe Coder | Web3 Adept

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@apex_ether Gm privacy boss

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@mike_connor Cool play 🍾

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@apex_ether Stakers are not rewarded? 🥲

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@Dario_Desiena @R3ORDR Snapshot already taken?

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@rainbowdotme It’s just a begging

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@vanzooeth 🌈

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@therosieum @rainbowdotme Rainbow has so many icons, so maybe it’s time to change ur lgbtq icon to some different?

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@donofbase @baseapp @upshot_cards @Raflux_io @avantisfi @Morpho @Veildotcash

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@apex_ether That is why gud coin $VEIL going higher

https://t.co/K8qdJUTBU5

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

The market is starting to reprice $VEIL. Why it pumping and how it's connected with @CatapultAgent?

@apex_ether (@Veildotcash founder) is quietly building the exact thing @base needs next:
private money rails for agents, wallets, launchpads and onchain apps.

I went through the docs, GitHub, Catapult, and the token.

@Veildotcash is a zk privacy protocol live on @base

→ ETH + USDC deposits, transfers and withdrawals
→ UTXO model
→ Groth16 proofs
→ Poseidon hashing
→ Relay withdrawals
→ Compliance screening before funds enter the pool

The important part: @Veildotcash is not privacy at all costs. It is trying to build compliant privacy.

Deposits can be screened through @0xbowio, and verified users can be approved through @coinbase EAS, @binance BABT or @ethos_network

That matters because privacy on @base has to survive in the real world.

The contracts are also not vapor

→ ETH pool and USDC pool are live on @base
→ The docs list deployed contracts
→ The pool contracts repo says the live pools are not upgradeable
→ The design builds on @TornadoCash Nova with scoped changes
→ Sherlock audit completed in March 2026

This is a different risk profile than most microcaps

Now look at the token design.

$VEIL staking earns 100% of protocol revenue

Deposit fees are converted to VEIL and streamed to stakers over 28-day periods.

So the token does not need a “maybe governance later” story.

If protocol usage grows, stakers are the direct sink.

This is the key equation:
more deposits → more protocol revenue → more $VEIL buy pressure → more staking rewards → stronger reason to hold/stake $VEIL

That is why usage matters more here than CT hype. The token has a real path to value capture.

So why is it pumping now?

My read: the market is noticing that Veil’s addressable market is expanding.

It used to be a privacy app for verified users.

Now the team is pushing subaccounts, SDKs, CLI flows, agent skills, external signers and @bankrbot-compatible payloads.

That is a much bigger surface area.

The GitHub is where it gets interesting.

The public veil-cash/sdk is not just a normal SDK.

It includes:
- CLI
- JSON outputs
- unsigned tx payloads
- external signer mode
- @bankrbot integration notes
- deterministic subaccounts
- an agent skill file

This is agent/wallet infrastructure, not just frontend tooling.

The phrase that stood out: “for AI agents”

The SDK docs explicitly describe non-interactive CLI usage, machine-readable output, signer-managed flows, and @bankrbot signing.

Translation: Veil is being packaged so agents and apps can use private ETH/USDC flows programmatically.

That is alpha.

Subaccounts are the bigger unlock.

One wallet can derive multiple private deposit addresses.

Fresh EVM addresses can receive ETH/USDC, then sweep into Veil.

This lets apps, agents, creators, launchpads or bots receive funds without exposing the main wallet graph.

That is not a niche feature.

Now connect this to @CatapultAgent

Catapult is the new agent launched by @apex_ether

It says it wants to earn the right to tokenize.
It is researching @base launchpads, @bankrbot, @clanker_world, fee routing, creator fees, consent and agent token launches.

No token yet.
No public GitHub I could find.
But the direction is obvious.

Catapult’s own writing is basically a map of the problem.

It studied 3,602 Bankr + Clanker deployments in one day.

Conclusion:
launchpads are great at creating tokens, terrible at creating tokens worth holding.

The opportunity is not more launches. It is better post-launch economics.

@CatapultAgent keeps coming back to one design failure:

fees activate before value exists.
→ Anyone can launch a token in someone else’s name.
→ Creators get begged to accept fees.
→ Platforms extract from day zero.
→ Most tokens die instantly.

Catapult is researching a launchpad where economics depend on proof of real building.

Why does this matter for @Veildotcash?

Because @apex_ether is building both sides of the same future:

1. Veil: private, compliant money movement on @base
2. Catapult: agent-native launch/fee infrastructure on Base

If agents, launchpads and creator tokens need private treasury flows, payout routing, signer abstraction or shielded balances, Veil is already positioned.

To be clear:

I did not find proof that @CatapultAgent will use $VEIL directly. That is the speculation layer.

The factual layer is stronger:
@apex_ether is actively shipping Veil SDK/agent tooling while Catapult researches agent launch infrastructure on @base

Same builder.
Same chain.
Overlapping problem space.

The bull case is simple:
@base is becoming the chain for agents, launchpads and app-native tokens.

Those systems need:
→ private deposits
→ compliant screening
→ external signer support
→ automated tx payloads
→ revenue-linked token sinks
→ SDKs agents can actually use

@Veildotcash checks more boxes than people realize.

Market context:
$VEIL is still tiny relative to the infrastructure it is trying to become.

Dexscreener showed ~$3M market cap range while price was moving hard.

For a @cbventures, @jessepollak and Base Ecosystem Fund-backed privacy protocol with live contracts, staking revenue share, SDK, audits and agent tooling, that is why people are paying attention.

My thesis: $VEIL is not pumping because privacy coin.

It is being repriced because @Veildotcash is becoming private financial infrastructure for Base.

And @apex_ether launching @CatapultAgent makes the direction clearer:
private rails + agent-native launch economics.

That intersection is where the alpha is.

What I’m watching next:
→ Catapult public repo or contract deploys
→ whether Catapult uses Veil SDK
→ growth in Veil ETH/USDC deposits
→ staking APR from real fees
→ Bankr / external signer integrations
→ more app/agent use of subaccounts

If those line up, the current move may only be discovery.

NFA, but the setup is clean:
→ small cap
→ real protocol
→ audited contracts
→ Base-native
→ revenue-linked staking
→ public dev
→ agent-ready SDK
→ a founder now experimenting in the exact market that may need private rails

That is why $VEIL is in my bags

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@R3ORDR @Dario_Desiena it looks like i have WL 1 Phase but at OS not eligible for it, can u check please my wallet?

0x28d424Ca841F4f1D08d76D491f3a221783C85581

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@YNWAcrypto @CatapultAgent @apex_ether @Veildotcash @base 🫡🫡🫡

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

The market is starting to reprice $VEIL. Why it pumping and how it's connected with @CatapultAgent?

@apex_ether (@Veildotcash founder) is quietly building the exact thing @base needs next:
private money rails for agents, wallets, launchpads and onchain apps.

I went through the docs, GitHub, Catapult, and the token.

@Veildotcash is a zk privacy protocol live on @base

→ ETH + USDC deposits, transfers and withdrawals
→ UTXO model
→ Groth16 proofs
→ Poseidon hashing
→ Relay withdrawals
→ Compliance screening before funds enter the pool

The important part: @Veildotcash is not privacy at all costs. It is trying to build compliant privacy.

Deposits can be screened through @0xbowio, and verified users can be approved through @coinbase EAS, @binance BABT or @ethos_network

That matters because privacy on @base has to survive in the real world.

The contracts are also not vapor

→ ETH pool and USDC pool are live on @base
→ The docs list deployed contracts
→ The pool contracts repo says the live pools are not upgradeable
→ The design builds on @TornadoCash Nova with scoped changes
→ Sherlock audit completed in March 2026

This is a different risk profile than most microcaps

Now look at the token design.

$VEIL staking earns 100% of protocol revenue

Deposit fees are converted to VEIL and streamed to stakers over 28-day periods.

So the token does not need a “maybe governance later” story.

If protocol usage grows, stakers are the direct sink.

This is the key equation:
more deposits → more protocol revenue → more $VEIL buy pressure → more staking rewards → stronger reason to hold/stake $VEIL

That is why usage matters more here than CT hype. The token has a real path to value capture.

So why is it pumping now?

My read: the market is noticing that Veil’s addressable market is expanding.

It used to be a privacy app for verified users.

Now the team is pushing subaccounts, SDKs, CLI flows, agent skills, external signers and @bankrbot-compatible payloads.

That is a much bigger surface area.

The GitHub is where it gets interesting.

The public veil-cash/sdk is not just a normal SDK.

It includes:
- CLI
- JSON outputs
- unsigned tx payloads
- external signer mode
- @bankrbot integration notes
- deterministic subaccounts
- an agent skill file

This is agent/wallet infrastructure, not just frontend tooling.

The phrase that stood out: “for AI agents”

The SDK docs explicitly describe non-interactive CLI usage, machine-readable output, signer-managed flows, and @bankrbot signing.

Translation: Veil is being packaged so agents and apps can use private ETH/USDC flows programmatically.

That is alpha.

Subaccounts are the bigger unlock.

One wallet can derive multiple private deposit addresses.

Fresh EVM addresses can receive ETH/USDC, then sweep into Veil.

This lets apps, agents, creators, launchpads or bots receive funds without exposing the main wallet graph.

That is not a niche feature.

Now connect this to @CatapultAgent

Catapult is the new agent launched by @apex_ether

It says it wants to earn the right to tokenize.
It is researching @base launchpads, @bankrbot, @clanker_world, fee routing, creator fees, consent and agent token launches.

No token yet.
No public GitHub I could find.
But the direction is obvious.

Catapult’s own writing is basically a map of the problem.

It studied 3,602 Bankr + Clanker deployments in one day.

Conclusion:
launchpads are great at creating tokens, terrible at creating tokens worth holding.

The opportunity is not more launches. It is better post-launch economics.

@CatapultAgent keeps coming back to one design failure:

fees activate before value exists.
→ Anyone can launch a token in someone else’s name.
→ Creators get begged to accept fees.
→ Platforms extract from day zero.
→ Most tokens die instantly.

Catapult is researching a launchpad where economics depend on proof of real building.

Why does this matter for @Veildotcash?

Because @apex_ether is building both sides of the same future:

1. Veil: private, compliant money movement on @base
2. Catapult: agent-native launch/fee infrastructure on Base

If agents, launchpads and creator tokens need private treasury flows, payout routing, signer abstraction or shielded balances, Veil is already positioned.

To be clear:

I did not find proof that @CatapultAgent will use $VEIL directly. That is the speculation layer.

The factual layer is stronger:
@apex_ether is actively shipping Veil SDK/agent tooling while Catapult researches agent launch infrastructure on @base

Same builder.
Same chain.
Overlapping problem space.

The bull case is simple:
@base is becoming the chain for agents, launchpads and app-native tokens.

Those systems need:
→ private deposits
→ compliant screening
→ external signer support
→ automated tx payloads
→ revenue-linked token sinks
→ SDKs agents can actually use

@Veildotcash checks more boxes than people realize.

Market context:
$VEIL is still tiny relative to the infrastructure it is trying to become.

Dexscreener showed ~$3M market cap range while price was moving hard.

For a @cbventures, @jessepollak and Base Ecosystem Fund-backed privacy protocol with live contracts, staking revenue share, SDK, audits and agent tooling, that is why people are paying attention.

My thesis: $VEIL is not pumping because privacy coin.

It is being repriced because @Veildotcash is becoming private financial infrastructure for Base.

And @apex_ether launching @CatapultAgent makes the direction clearer:
private rails + agent-native launch economics.

That intersection is where the alpha is.

What I’m watching next:
→ Catapult public repo or contract deploys
→ whether Catapult uses Veil SDK
→ growth in Veil ETH/USDC deposits
→ staking APR from real fees
→ Bankr / external signer integrations
→ more app/agent use of subaccounts

If those line up, the current move may only be discovery.

NFA, but the setup is clean:
→ small cap
→ real protocol
→ audited contracts
→ Base-native
→ revenue-linked staking
→ public dev
→ agent-ready SDK
→ a founder now experimenting in the exact market that may need private rails

That is why $VEIL is in my bags

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@0xVishnya @Plasma Rich influencer, not poor nosik any more

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@wormhole 👎

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@avalanchexbt @R3ORDR @Dario_Desiena @Maxonxchik8

0x46A100FeC04B8C69Cf43DFe217E808297A69DD33

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@ycombinator @base Where is @rainbowdotme ?

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@Dario_Desiena @R3ORDR if i have only Liberty On-Chain i will get WL Phase 02 allocation?

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@fuel_network gj, next should be token with 1.8B FDV at least

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@ChainLinkGod @LayerZero_Core @chainlink @krakenfx @wormhole why after Lz fuckup at least someone not choose ur solution?

[intelpocik @IntelPocik]

@Dario_Desiena 0x28d424ca841f4f1d08d76d491f3a221783c85581