The Aurion Compass, created in April 2025, turns 3D.
Not in a hologram style, unfortunately (would be very cool).
But in a sense that it's not just important to model the relationships and architecture in an organization from an inside perspective.
But also its externally perceived state.
More importantly. They must be distinct and mapped next to another.
Cause the gap between what is perceived and what is internal, can answer a wide variety of questions.
- Why do they not see what we see?
- Why is Team A drifting from our organizational goals?
- Why does there sit a gap between what our customers think of us, versus what we are trying to brand ourselves as?
Countless of other questions sit in this domain of inner system architecture, and perception of other systems.
Now this also means that the AI system developed by Aurion Dynamics will also slowly start to embed this new philosophy and cybernetics angle, so that it will be able to handle more strategic objectives and adaptation processes.
And who knows, the Aurion Compass turning in a hologram might be sooner than later.
@araseb_ Grab a chair, sit in your hallway and leave everything out that can grab your attention. Hang a clock in front of you. Allow yourself to go to bed at 10PM. And I guarantee, time will become your enemy
being like and being authentic is a constant tension we navigate every day.
and if there’s a disbalance, that shows up in stress, frustration and thoughts critiquing yourself.
do you know where you sit on the gradient?
@aaron_epstein specialist software at an instant is still miles away. Getting it right takes a really long time without overcommitting on assumptions that break your product when disproven.
Making a table and some flows was already 1 evening of work pre-ai.
As someone recognising patterns.
The more AI will impact our daily lives.
The more likely we’ll get a stronger counter narrative.
My bet is that between 2028 and 2035 we’ll be living the #LiberateAI movement
@atmoio I guess it comes down to wanting to create a world that stretches your fantasy, or by playing a game but you feel like different rules or styling would be better/ more enjoyable
I came across an article today about Rijkswaterstaat postponing maintenance on roads, bridges and tunnels because funding is running short.
Curious what ClarityOS would make of it, I fed the situation into the system.
The pattern it surfaced was:
Drift → Detachment → Late Crisis
The reasoning was interesting.
If the rate of deterioration exceeds the rate of maintenance, the backlog doesn't grow because of poor planning. It grows as a mathematical certainty.
Every deferred repair creates future work.
Every aging asset increases future demand.
Every year of underinvestment widens the gap between what the infrastructure requires and what the system can realistically deliver.
What stood out to me was that the visible problem isn't the backlog. The visible problem sits in the the restrictions that everyone experience.
Lane closures.
Speed reductions.
Temporary mitigations.
The backlog itself remains largely invisible.
From that perspective, these measures aren't solving the problem. They're buying time while the underlying gap continues to compound.
What ClarityOS identified was a feedback loop:
1. Funding falls short of maintenance requirements.
2. Maintenance gets deferred.
3. Assets deteriorate.
4. The cost of recovery increases.
5. The funding gap widens.
6. More maintenance gets deferred.
7. The cycle repeats.
The classification wasn't "crisis".
It was "drift".
Which is an interesting distinction.
A crisis suggests something suddenly went wrong.
Drift suggests the system slowly moved away from the conditions required to sustain itself.
By the time the crisis becomes visible, the drift has often been present for years.
Link to article: https://t.co/oPhkLYwPvZ
Disclaimer: This analysis was generated using ClarityOS based on publicly available information and should be treated as a provisional structural interpretation rather than a confirmed diagnosis. Additional information, stakeholder perspectives and domain expertise may materially change the outcome.
Hey @boardyai we have already gotten introduced and I’m now exploring whether raising is the right thing to do now. Still a tad early but thats where angels might be able to help.
Not just raise or not raise. But also to get their perspective on the long-infrastructure while looking delusional to the public game
Cause they can't. And I keep getting sick of those in the comments claiming that they can cause then it turns into a personal accountability check.
The real reason is that the existing power structures in the world don't want to solve them. Either by creating dependency on the governments, or guerillas, elite frat club corruption or other reasons.
You can have all the money in the world.
But if the people whom are in power don't want it resolved, no money is going to change that.
Not everything is a money question. The amount of politics and power aspects, make change very hard which can cost a lot more then just money.
To what extent is mentall illness with young people real? And to what extent are these people just configured differently, while being forced to adapt to a system that was never designed for them.
The suffering is real.
But what is it induced by society norms and standards.
Vs deduced out of themselves?
Here is why most people suck at taking in feedback:
People exist between in two different types of systems. The Internal, and the perceived system.
One is determined by who you are and what you’re building towards.
The other is how others see you.
The failure mode for many people sit in that they let the perception of other immediately say something about the internal state.
And that’s where most frustration comes from.
The answer sits in decoupling them.
Let the feedback come in at how others perceive you. Don’t judge it. Use it as data. Don’t immediately respond unless the consequences are of high significance. But if you have any time to respond, take that.
What you want is for the emotions to simmer down, and check in with yourself why it made you feel angry or upset.
And only then, take the feedback and assess what’s actually fair. Versus what’s bullshit.
Use the fair feedback for growth.
Use the BS as a signal to read your environment and their intentions, and to manage how others perceive you.
If feedback hurts most of the time. You’re letting the information get too close to you and then you have to do in-depth shoveling to get it back out again.
Don’t let it reach you in the first place.