![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnHZzIWwAAKYKY.jpg)
![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnEOBvWcAAyK1L.jpg)
Olivia
Online
$AKT back above the H4 btw
Elon Musk issues chilling free speech message over Keir Starmer's social media ban
https://t.co/ag03f1WHrl
Who to follow
Marc Fletcher (Fletch)
@FletchTheTrader
Follow me - Stock Trader/Investor. Love a random fact. Ex military (Army), mixologist, beer, gin, wine connoisseur, cyclist, MotoGP, sport, music and news lover
BazLogic 
@BazLogicUK
Precious Metals & Crypto Assets investor. Looking forward to see how 2026 plays out. Tweets are opinion only. Please DYOR !! 🤞😎
Bandito1
@Bandito112
AIM investor unfortunately.
Arrests for social media posts top 10 countries.
You still think the social media ban is to "protect children"?
$Akt
Kimi 2.7 now available on @akashnetAI with near Fable-Class benchmarks.
Tuned specifically for agentic coding, OpenRouter and connected Claude Code users can now test drive the latest from Moonshot AI with AkashML.
Not yet connected? Details 👇
Fact
This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.
JUST IN: 🇬🇧 Elon Musk says UK government is trying to "track everyone."
@Polymarket Nobody:
UK Government: We just want you to verify your face, passport, and credit cards to use your "anonymous" social media platforms so when you post a comment there we don't like, we can come arrest you like we do for facebook posts.
AKT 👌🏼
A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN
![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnI6XeWkAANqak.jpg)
@SagaAILabs Absolute worthless
EXACTLY!
One threw a stone at a police shield- Prison sentence- 2 years.
The second broke a police women’s nose and physically assaulted other officers- Walked Free.
One is White & British. The other is Not.
@Keir_Starmer @DavidLammy - and you wonder why the country’s on FIRE ?🔥
Vickrum Digwa’s brother, Gurpreet Digwa, 27, lied to police that Henry Nowak hadn’t been stabbed and had racially attacked his brother, perverting the course of justice.
Police also recorded him conspiring with Vickrum in a police car.
Six months later, he was arrested on multiple weapons charges and is currently on bail.
Meanwhile, Reece Robinson, 21, threw two stones at the Southampton police protest, hitting no one, and was jailed for 2 years and 1 month within 7 days.
So far, Keir Starmer has blamed:
Nigel Farage.
Elon Musk.
JD Vance.
Tommy Robinson.
At some point, he's going to have to look in the mirror.
This is Reece Robinson 21. He throw stones towards a police officer at the Southampton protests. The stones never hit the officers. He’s now been put in prison for 2 years.
Yet a man previously housed at Wethersfield brutally attacked 2 security guards - walks free
Yet a man housed at Wethersfield sexually assaults a nurse - walks free
Yet a man housed at at Wethersfield punched a women - currently on bail and free to go to Chelmsford or Colchester
Yet a man housed at Wethersfield stabbed another man with scissors - 3 months in a young offenders
Perverts are avoiding jail daily.
Make that make sense ?
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.3M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.2M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.1M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.2M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.9M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.3M followers