@HHH_habby @TraceyJ2991@scrufwiththecat@wSoFcknTired https://t.co/mNwU5Na9Aw
https://t.co/R3LjArr2pC
https://t.co/Elg0dGo0Kw
https://t.co/mf8R511oII
https://t.co/yPnj5S9Aps
https://t.co/RPxwAsStmr
https://t.co/Zjdg7mVdxQ
That took a 5 minute google search, they were all on the front page.
@SkullScience @FolkpunkFerret @TwoPoofsPod @WhenSumIsJusRig@TheAdvocateMag The fact that the Cass Review cites peer reviewed papers and draws erroneous conclusions does not imply the Cass Review, itself, is scientifically valid. Here is an actual scientific review of the Cass Paper:
https://t.co/7e4SNmFH28
@TwoPoofsPod @WhenSumIsJusRig@TheAdvocateMag Also, your defense to THIS ARTICLE (which is good evidence) is just to claim, without support, that no good evidence exists.
@TwoPoofsPod @WhenSumIsJusRig@TheAdvocateMag The Cass Review is not a scientific study. It has never passed the peer review process and has never appeared in any accredited scentific journal. It has shown significant methodology problems and an inconsistent basis for discrediting or accepting papers.
@TwoPoofsPod @TheAdvocateMag No it hasn't. The overwhelming scientific consensus shows the same outcome as this article and, in fact, Gender Affirming Care has proven to be the ONLY effective treatment for transgender patients in repeated studies.
@VaderZZaSooner@airman614@ofijake_@InternetH0F My brothers and sisters and I did not fight and die so you could be a loser on the internet. Grow some self-respect before representing my country.
@TomsTidbits @zquill26 @stacycay Oh look, you can't find peer-reviewed articles for things that aren't true (which is why you haven't found one after 10 days of searching)
Thank you for proving my point
@TomsTidbits @zquill26 @stacycay I already posted a peer-reviewed scientific article. You've provided nothing.
Did you... forget that happened? Are you on drugs?
@ChickenTendieus @Quibilah1 Naaah, that one isn't going anywhere. The CURRENT supreme court made that ruling in U.S. v. Skrmetti and is unlikely to reverse itself.