@Heptagon247@SteveCl58542482@CathyYoung63@JamesTate121 Rand Paul basically admitted before the hearing that if he could trip him up on any little contradiction he would pursue a purgery charge. Thats why he pleaded the 5th.
@WARPUG@greendragonhq He pleaded the fifth as Paul essentially admitted he was going to entrap him in the hearing, forcing a contradiction and then prusing surgery charges.
@Gwydion_Wolf@greendragonhq China didnt let anyone in to look. Even if it is lab borne, they still would never have let anyone in. And if China had that info as it was lab borne how did they not win the vaccine race.
@LegendaryTakes@chrisvanderveen "As of 2026, WHO's SAGO and multiple peer-reviewed analyses favor zoonotic spillover at Wuhan's Huanan market based on wildlife trade evidence and genetic data, while lab leak remains plausible but lacks direct proof amid China's withheld records and ongoing debate"
@HumboldtCo43153@p_55_022@DrNeilStone@grok You keep saying this but global pharmaceutical industry is worth over 1 trillion annually with alternative health being worth 300 billion annually.
@DoonanDecl33260@EmployRightsIE If 1 in 5 are born outside Ireland, that still leave 4 out of 5 Irish people to vote. I dont see how the minority could control the elections
@Murphman@IrishDad16@kenoflynnTD OK thats not the case, and as such this scheme is proving a success for the environment as it has increased return rates, reduced littering and is giving us the opportunity to cut out the travel miles for processing bottle to bottle
@Murphman@IrishDad16@kenoflynnTD There are talks to open a processing plant in Ireland because the scheme has made it cost effective as we now get enough unspoiled/clean bottles and cans back. This wasnt the case before the scheme as people just didn't use their recycling bin correctly
@lesdeuxbernois@kamabi@Endsofinve18158@JennPellegrino@ok_patriot4@elonmusk You being ultra pedantic on the issue says it all. Too embarrassed to see the truth so focus on the incorrect use of one word. Yes her exact statement was incorrect, but her overarching point in the conversation still stands to reason
@MarkFletch117@ChrisSru880101 Gardner said the words, it was over the shoulder, which is a penalty offence, but continued, im fine with that. It was ridiculous refereeing
@SmHrtly_ Should have been a penalty for the high tackle. Around the shoulder is an illegal tackle. How can he say thats around the shoulder, im fine with that