Same market conditions. Different outcomes.
Buy today, wait tomorrow, exit early next, that inconsistency breaks trust.
And without trust, institutions won’t commit capital.
#Qubic's Dispatcher has started receiving #Monero shares from #Qubic miners and relaying them to https://t.co/RTJNSy9GIC. Still in test mode, but so far everything works as planned. Now we are waiting for answers to these two questions:
1. Is our network quick enough to produce non-stale shares?
2. What percentage of total #Monero hashrate do we have?
🔥🚨 MOST PEOPLE OVERLOOKED THIS FROM TODAY’S WHITE HOUSE CRYPTO SUMMIT!
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just dropped a BOMBSHELL 👉 “We will keep the US the dominant reserve currency… and use stablecoins to do that.”
This could be massive for XRP. Here’s what you need to know 🧵👇
‼️HOLY SH**
After 7 years in crypto, I've never seen anything like $Qubic. This is going to blow your mind...
🧵 THREAD: Why $Qubic might be the biggest innovation since Bitcoin 👇
I've seen every "ETH killer" since 2017. But $Qubic? Different beast. Zero fees. Sub-second finality. And get this - miners actually power AI instead of wasting energy
Let me break down why this is MASSIVE. First up: Their consensus mechanism is WILD. 676 Computors running the show. No mining bottlenecks. This is what real decentralization looks like 💪
Remember paying $100+ for ETH gas? $Qubic: ZERO fees. Not "low fees." ZERO. This enables true micro-transactions for the first time ever. Game-changer for mass adoption
Here's what blows my mind: Useful Proof of Work. Instead of burning energy, miners power AI computations. Genius. This is the future of blockchain utility
The bare-metal deployment is pure - Direct hardware optimization = faster speeds + better security. My tech friends are losing it over this innovation.
Been here since 2016, and I'm calling it: $Qubic isn't just another L1. It's an entirely new paradigm for blockchain tech.
What do you think? Is $Qubic the next big thing? Drop a if you're watching this project
ChatGPT just said it would estimate a 70% to 85% probability that $QUBIC creator @c___f___b is $BTC creator Satoshi
And it said that this was one of the strongest cases for Satoshi:
I'm sure many people will disagree, feel free to read through the ChatGPT link below
I didn't put in all the evidence
But if anyone out there thinks I omitted any evidence that would stand against CFB being Satoshi, please comment below
https://t.co/x9oMXYPIMM
@BraverCrypto@phoenix_cr47@lexfridman@joerogan@IamZeroIka @postsimply69 @maxdarachi@_Qubic_@APompliano@saylor
Did I just find the most bullish hopium piece ever in history
OTHERS/BTC took 36 months from 2018 to 2021 to bottom and turbo pump until late 2021
OTHERS/BTC took 36 months (so far) from 2022 to 2025 to (bottom and turbo pump until late 2025)
Literally the same drawdown from the top so far 🤯
🚨BREAKING: During the #XRP Community Day, Brad Garlinghouse announced that he had a direct conversation with President Trump about XRP being a US strategic reserve asset! 🇺🇸🦅
There is one major issue with this $QUBIC founder CFB = Satoshi post I made yesterday
I found some new information and I got super excited
But I discovered one small flaw in my thinking that makes me not 99.99% confident that CFB is Satoshi
This is the great thing about sharing this information out in the public, you get to hear other people's points of views and critiques of your thought process
The flaw in my thinking:
That issue is that although I can prove the name CFB has existed since as far back as 2002
I can only see the name Qubic existing since 2012
So it is possible that CFB looked at one of Satoshi's Bitcoin addresses and thought "this begins with 15ubic" that is Qubic when you use base58, maybe I'll name my future project Qubic
So maybe the Satoshi address with 15ubic at the start came first
And then CFB decided to name Qubic after this address
It still seems like CFB probably did create this address (especially when you pair it with all the other proof, much of which I'll share soon)
But this 15ubic address isn't the 99.99% proof that I thought it was
Sorry folks! Some poor thinking on my part!
I've been asked to stop digging deeper. And I respect that request.
I will retweet related content from others onwards, but won't post new (web archived) findings anymore.