JC52112

[Amee Vanderpool @girlsreallyrule]

Take a minute and watch how Fox News called coronavirus a hoax, misleading millions and then reversed course with no explanation, clarification or apology-just like the president.

[John O. Brennan @JohnBrennan]

While you fabricated bone spurs to avoid military service, John Kelly served as a brave & valiant military officer. One can disagree with John’s views, statements, or actions, but there is no denying he is an American patriot.

You, however, will always be a national disgrace.

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@R_H_Ebright @schneiderleonid 'was not released until Jan 12', 7 (but not 17) days after...

[JC52112 @JC52112]

This is like majority of American people are honest, but the fate of America is currently controlled by a crooked president and his GOP colleagues.

[JC52112 @JC52112]

https://t.co/H8Pw2aScCe

[JC52112 @JC52112]

https://t.co/WOzKmH6alR

[JC52112 @JC52112]

https://t.co/GxHQNqOj0C

[JC52112 @JC52112]

I have no doubt that @nature enables research misconducts. Do you agree, Dr. @Magda_Skipper?

[JC52112 @JC52112]

Of course. He will be glad that President Cao is now proven to be the same kind of person as him - hypocrite.

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@aganMA01 @nature Nature at 150: evidence for enabling research misconduct

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@nature actually enabled research misconduct.

[JC52112 @JC52112]

Translated by Google: Beginning with falsification, finally shameless. @nature @SpringerNature @NatureNews @Magda_Skipper @OMGScience_Plow @newscientist @schneiderleonid @SanLi_today

[JC52112 @JC52112]

I told you she will simply bury her head in the sand.

[Roberto Alonso González Lezcano @robertoglezcano]

They just need to talk...
https://t.co/jmdKDql4lA

[JC52112 @JC52112]

I bet this new EiC of @nature will bury her head in the sand. @fangshimin @schneiderleonid @C0PE @HuffPost @statnews

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@NIHDirector Any explanation for your knowingly endorsing flawed paper to get millions of taxpayer's dollar?https://t.co/zDGQs0zU1N

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@RetractionWatch @C0PE @verokiermer @PubPeer @ivanoransky @GaetanBurgio @edyong209 Wow. Just found 'update of' was changed back to 'Erratum for'. What happened? @schneiderleonid @Magda_Skipper @NatureNews @NCBI @core_pub @pubpeer

[JC52112 @JC52112]

@RetractionWatch @C0PE @verokiermer @PubPeer Now "Erratum for" replaced by "Update of". Can anyone tell me the difference between the 2 phrases? @ivanoransky @GaetanBurgio @edyong209

[JC52112 @JC52112]

Likewise, after his PhD student was found guilty of research misconduct, Collins - who was in the lab EVERY WEEK - presented himself as a victim with his presence in lab acting as SAFEGUARD AGAINST FRAUD. https://t.co/34Jc5fyp7s