JEFFINTEXAS

Change IS coming.

[Gabriel J. Benton ☦️🇺🇸 @OrthodoxPole81]

Katy Faust on the Science of Fatherless Children

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

It's coming down.

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

AI-GENERATED COMMENTARY ON CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO UNILATERAL "NO-FA... https://t.co/PJdh0xHG5n via @YouTube

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

AI-GENERATED COMMENTARY ON CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO UNILATERAL "NO-FA... https://t.co/PJdh0xHG5n via @YouTube

[Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy]

This is what happened https://t.co/SjDrV7LEc6

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

BAR GRIEVANCE AGAINST GINGER ANN SHOCKLEY WEATHERSPOON, MAY 16, 2026 https://t.co/nEuHFrbnsl via @YouTube

On May 16, 2026, I had my bar grievance against GINGER ANN SHOCKLEY WEATHERSPOON, Texas Bar Card Number 24051583, notarized and sent to the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel (OCDC), State Bar of Texas, PO Box 12487, Austin, TX 78711-2487. I am asking the OCDC to investigate what I believe is objectively verifiable misconduct provable from the documentary record alone.

My grievance presents five interconnected violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, each grounded in the documentary record.

These five violations are as follows:
1) TDRPC 3.0(a)(a) - Candor toward the tribunal. Ginger offered same-day contradictory sworn positions.
2) TDRPC 8.04(a)(3) - Conduct involving dishonesty or misrepresentation.
3) TDRPC 3.01 - Filing a claim for an improper purpose, which I assert she admitted on a certified transcript.
4) TDRPC 3.02 - Unreasonably increasing costs and burdens of litigation.
5) TDRPC 4.04(a) - Using means with no substantial purpose other than to burden a third party.

This video introduces my grievance against Ginger Ann Shockley Weatherspoon. Though I will not be able to make and publish additional videos for a few days due to work obligations and travel, I plan to delve into the grievance in greater detail of my complaint as time permits.

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS IN COURT https://t.co/5RwaPl9QfG via @YouTube

[Camus @newstart_2024]

The boomers didn’t just break families — they made it normal not to form them at all.

Helen Andrews put it sharply on Tipping Point OAN: Boomers saw any constraint on individual choice as evil, especially lifelong commitments like marriage and family. What felt liberating at 25 started looking hollow at 45 and lonely at 65.

Now millennials are inheriting the wreckage — not a crisis of broken families, but a crisis of absent ones. People are reaching their 30s gripped by the quiet terror that they might never build what previous generations took for granted.

We’re watching a slow-motion demographic and emotional collapse where the very institutions that gave life meaning (stable families, long-term commitments) have been hollowed out.

Freedom without guardrails eventually becomes its own kind of cage — one where you have endless options but no deep roots.

Do you think the biggest family crisis today is divorce (like in the 70s/80s) or the growing number of people who never form families at all? What’s one cultural shift that could actually help reverse this?

[Marriage Covenant Contracts @MarriageCovenan]

Legally enforceable marriage contracts are available for Arkansas, Arizona, and Colorado. More states coming soon.
https://t.co/OLy3pNCTvF

[Psychology Today @PsychToday]

A new study finds that fathers play a unique and powerful role in shaping their children’s long-term physical health. Here's how. https://t.co/qcfQgYAUJQ

[Brooke @buckeyebettie]

Statistics show women’s happiness has declined as feminist influence has increased.

[Brooke @buckeyebettie]

Source:

Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors https://t.co/GykIjHAX9R

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

@buckeyebettie Feminism is anti-male, anti-child, anti-society - and most of all, anti-woman.

[Brooke @buckeyebettie]

Feminism has not benefited men, women and children.

Let me count 50 ways feminism has harmed society:

1. Decline in male college enrollment
2. Parental alienation in family courts
3. High male suicide rates
4. Loss of male-only mentorship spaces
5. Sentencing disparities for men
6. Stigmatization of traditional masculinity
7. Workplace hazards remaining male-dominated
8. Lack of domestic abuse resources for men
9. Due process concerns in HR/Legal settings
10.The "two-income trap" making single-income homes impossible
11. The "Double Burden" (work and home labor) for women
12.Devaluation of stay-at-home motherhood
13.Rising female burnout and stress
14.Declining female happiness metrics
15.Delayed marriage and fertility struggles
16.Breakdown of the nuclear family
17.Rise in fatherless households
18.Increased child poverty in single-parent homes
19.Hookup culture replacing stable relationships
20. Hyper-competition in the workplace
21.Erasure of female-only safe spaces
22.Over-sexualization in the name of "empowerment"
23. Loss of traditional social protections for women
24. Economic pressure on mothers to return to work early
25. Decline in male role models in schools
26. Lower birth rates and demographic decline
27.Increased childhood anxiety and depression
28. Heavy reliance on institutional daycare over parental care
29.Loss of clear rites of passage for boys
30. Weakening of community social fabric
31.Increased polarization between the sexes
32.Disruption of the "provider" identity for men
33. Legal risks associated with modern marriage
34. Conflicting social expectations for "modern" men
35. Academic underperformance of boys
36. Loss of traditional manners and chivalry (male/female)
37.Commodification of the home and family life
38. Social isolation for older men
39.Pressure on women to "have it all" simultaneously
40. Decline in male-dominated trade participation
41.Rise in "Deaths of Despair" (addiction/overdose)
42. Gender-based tribalism in politics
43. Erosion of the complementary partnership model
44. Over-litigation of social interactions
45. Parental stress impacting child development
46. Loss of distinct cultural roles for men and women
47.Housing market inflation based on two-income norms
48. Increased loneliness across all age groups
49. Fragility of modern relationship contracts
50. Loss of long-term intergenerational stability

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

NO FAULT DIVORCE GIVES THE COURTS THE POWER TO PUNISH INNOCENT PEOPLE - ... https://t.co/bAyXkctA2y via @YouTube

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

NO FAULT DIVORCE GIVES THE COURTS THE POWER TO PUNISH INNOCENT PEOPLE - ... https://t.co/BQP37f70bv via @YouTube

In this final video, Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane discuss how no-fault divorce punishes innocent people - including innocent children as well.

This is a great injustice. Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

TWO COMMON OBJECTIONS AGAINST NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part 8 of 9 https://t.co/yRwDjQtevV via @YouTube

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

TWO COMMON OBJECTIONS AGAINST NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part 8 of 9 https://t.co/g7LzaTHIpH via @YouTube

In this eighth video, "A Male Space" brings up two objections to Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane to no-fault divorce. The first objection is why should we keep two people together; why should we keep someone "trapped" in a marriage; why should someone be in a marriage they don't want to be in? The second objection is what about the cases in which someone cannot "prove" actual transgressions in the marriage?

Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

[JEFFINTEXAS @JEFFINTEXAS1]

NO FAULT DIVORCE HAS DEBASED OUR ENTIRE JUDICIARY SYSTEM - Part 7 of 9 https://t.co/uGebxE4Ugj via @YouTube