Circus. Iran is demanding a ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, even though one is already in place. Despite that, Hezbollah continues to fire rockets into Israel, while Israel can only respond and not launch attacks because it is following the agreement in place.
Iran controls Hezbollah and says it will not continue to “negotiate” unless an additional ceasefire is put in place.
And Hezbollah rejects an extra ceasefire a statement controlled by Iran.
You can’t make this up. Trump must stop “negotiating” with politicians who have no power, eliminate the IRGC, and give the political leadership a one-way ticket out of Iran.
https://t.co/ztK2DKnBf7
@AnnaOdesitka@DrEliDavid@SecRubio Try to find the facts instead of hurling profanities. You will be surprised by how easy it is and by how wrong you are.
This viral “Obama Files” post is fake.
No evidence of Tehran servers, handwritten Benghazi stand-down, Epstein comms, or 2024 shadow backchannel.
The $1.7B was a real (controversial) settlement of Iran’s own pre-1979 money — not secret Hezbollah wires.
8+ probes found no Obama directive.
Classic unsourced drop. Demand proof.
The EU is a clown world. All national leaderships should resign and dissolve the European Union.
Rebuild Europe as a group of patriotic, common-sense countries aligned with the United States of America.
Leave the naysayers behind in despair.
OMNI STÖDJER DIKTATURER OCH SPRIDER IRANS PROPAGANDA
OMNI är inte bara emot demokrati, mänskliga rättigheter och kvinnors frigörelse. Ni agerar aktivt för och stödjer diktaturer över hela världen, vilket borde vara nog för att dra in ert publiceringstillstånd och presstöd.
Nu agerar OMNI för IRGC, som mördar sina egna invånare, genom att sprida propaganda. Om ni har sett några siffror om hur kriget har genomförts från den första timmen, vet ni att det är Iran som sprider rent nonsens för att underminera sin egen befolkning och hindra den från att resa sig mot den iranska diktaturen.
Ytterligare ett exempel:
Artikel;
March 6 2026
Donald Trump har tappat kontrollen över kriget i Iran. Det hävdar en iransk säkerhetskälla till CNN.
Källan menar att Iran har åsamkat USA ett strategiskt nederlag och att Trumps retorik är ett tecken på det.
– Ökningen av hans förolämpningar och kränkande språk mot det iranska folket visar att han har tappat kontrollen över hur kriget hanteras, säger källan.
Tidigare under måndagen avvisade Iran USA:s förslag om vapenvila och lade i stället fram en lista med tio motkrav. Punkterna rör bland annat lättade sanktioner, återuppbyggnad, ett protokoll för säker passage genom Hormuzsundet och ett slut på konflikterna i regionen, enligt Reuters.
CNN-källan säger också att Iran har gjort klart för berörda parter att Hormuzsundet inte kommer att återgå till det normala om inte kriget upphör omedelbart.
– Iran vill få slut på kriget, men inte på det sätt eller enligt den tidsplan som Trump eftersträvar.
https://t.co/swzhQUT4QD
OMNI STÖDJER DIKTATURER OCH SPRIDER IRANS PROPAGANDA
OMNI är inte bara emot demokrati, mänskliga rättigheter och kvinnors frigörelse. Ni agerar aktivt för och stödjer diktaturer över hela världen, vilket borde vara nog för att dra in ert publiceringstillstånd och presstöd.
Nu agerar OMNI för IRGC, som mördar sina egna invånare, genom att sprida propaganda. Om ni har sett några siffror om hur kriget har genomförts från den första timmen, vet ni att det är Iran som sprider rent nonsens för att underminera sin egen befolkning och hindra den från att resa sig mot den iranska diktaturen.
Artikel;
March 6 2026
Donald Trump har tappat kontrollen över kriget i Iran. Det hävdar en iransk säkerhetskälla till CNN.
Källan menar att Iran har åsamkat USA ett strategiskt nederlag och att Trumps retorik är ett tecken på det.
– Ökningen av hans förolämpningar och kränkande språk mot det iranska folket visar att han har tappat kontrollen över hur kriget hanteras, säger källan.
Tidigare under måndagen avvisade Iran USA:s förslag om vapenvila och lade i stället fram en lista med tio motkrav. Punkterna rör bland annat lättade sanktioner, återuppbyggnad, ett protokoll för säker passage genom Hormuzsundet och ett slut på konflikterna i regionen, enligt Reuters.
CNN-källan säger också att Iran har gjort klart för berörda parter att Hormuzsundet inte kommer att återgå till det normala om inte kriget upphör omedelbart.
– Iran vill få slut på kriget, men inte på det sätt eller enligt den tidsplan som Trump eftersträvar.
https://t.co/swzhQUT4QD
🚨 EU JUST COPIED TRUMP!
European Parliament just voted 389-206 to create Trump-style “Return Hubs” — offshore centers to deport rejected asylum seekers & illegal migrants FAST.
After years of slamming Trump’s border policies, Europe now admits open borders FAILED and is adopting the SAME tactics.
The Great Awakening is HERE! 🔥🇪🇺read more ⬇️
The key decision occurred on March 26, 2026 (a Thursday), when the European Parliament (EP) held its plenary vote to adopt its position on the proposed reform of the EU Returns Regulation (procedure code 2025/0059(COD), ordinary legislative procedure, first reading). This followed the Civil Liberties Committee’s approval of the draft on March 9, 2026. The vote opened interinstitutional negotiations (trilogue) with the Council of the EU, which had already reached its general approach in December 2025. The Newsweek article (published March 29, 2026) and the Associated Press report (published shortly after the vote) described this as the EU “recently approved” enabling measures. 
Facts in the Voting
• Result: 389 MEPs in favor, 206 against, 32 abstentions.
• Support: Primarily from center-right (EPP) and far-right groups (including alliances previously avoided).
• Opposition: Left, Greens, and center-left parties (S&D, Greens/EFA, The Left requested the plenary vote under Rule 72).
• Context: The vote approved Parliament’s negotiating mandate, including provisions for “return hubs.” Negotiations with the Council (Cyprus Presidency) could begin the same day, with expectations of quick agreement due to aligned positions. 
What the New Policy Means for All European Countries
The reform updates and replaces the 2008 Returns Directive with a stronger, harmonized EU-wide framework for returning irregular migrants and rejected asylum-seekers. Key elements include:
• Return hubs: Allows any EU member state (or small coalitions) to negotiate bilateral agreements with third countries (primarily in Africa and elsewhere) to establish offshore detention/processing centers outside the EU. Rejected asylum-seekers or those without legal stay can be transferred there instead of (or while awaiting) deportation to their origin country.
• Other measures: Tougher penalties for non-cooperation with return orders; extended maximum detention periods (up to 24 months or longer in some interpretations); entry bans; and faster procedures overall.
• Scope for all 27 EU countries: This is not mandatory—no country is forced to build or use hubs. It provides a uniform legal basis and tools that every member state can opt into. Countries like Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Denmark, and Greece are already negotiating deals and view it as enabling faster, more effective returns. It applies EU-wide standards for tracking, detaining, and deporting irregular migrants, aiming to increase overall return rates.
Nuances and implications:
• It shifts from direct returns (often difficult due to lack of cooperation from origin countries) to third-country facilities, echoing externalization models.
• Human rights groups have raised concerns about potential “legal black holes,” reduced monitoring of rights, and deterrence effects.
• It reflects a broader political shift toward stricter migration enforcement but builds on existing EU efforts (e.g., related to the 2024/2026 Pact on Migration and Asylum).
• Edge cases: Voluntary participation means varying implementation across countries; bilateral deals must still comply with EU fundamental rights standards (in theory). 
When Will It Be Executed?
• Not immediate: The March 26 vote was only Parliament’s green light to negotiate—not final adoption of the law.
• Next steps and timeline: Trilogue negotiations (Parliament + Council + Commission) are expected to conclude quickly (no major differences reported). Final adoption of the regulation is anticipated before summer 2026 (likely June–July). As a regulation, it becomes directly applicable across the EU
@sybille_zeisel@SaP011 Diese Vergewaltiger zu verteidigen, wenn der Bericht eindeutig sachlich ist, ist genauso krank, wie selbst ein Täter zu sein.
Defending those rapists when the report is plainly factual is as sick as being a perpetrator yourself.
RESIGN. Rand Paul was injured and went through a very difficult time after that assault. He likely still feels unsafe when he is outside. However, turning this personal trauma into a deciding factor when confirming or rejecting an official should be questioned and criticized. By opposing a United States attack on Iran, Rand Paul is, in effect, harming the Iranian people by rejecting efforts to free them, thereby accepting two serious consequences.
First, tens of thousands—possibly hundreds of thousands—of Iranians have been murdered, tortured, or imprisoned by the Iranian regime.
Second, the nuclear threat posed to the world may have no viable solution other than military action against the Iranian regime. How many more people could the regime destroy if it acquires nuclear weapons? History shows that this risk cannot be dismissed. Even recent events demonstrate a pattern of attacking neighbors and targeting civilians, which constitutes war crimes.
Rand Paul’s priorities, in this context, are deeply misguided and should be subject to strong criticism.
I am calling for Rand Paul’s resignation after he has shown a willingness to place personal feelings above the interests of the American, European, and Iranian people, as well as those of neighboring countries in the Middle East.
https://t.co/VQd6diA7fT
@elonmusk@grok GPT is shallow in its responses. It argues when something is not politically correct, sneaks in points that are the opposite of what you mean, and makes it difficult to trust when it comes to facts.
Here in this seemingly minor and apparently insignificant video attached lies the first piece of public evidence I have seen that supports my view that the different actions President Trump has taken over the last 13 months — which on the surface appeared unrelated to each other and each seemed to have its own justification — may actually follow a well-planned pattern. I had a hunch that there was a structure behind it that I could not yet clearly see, almost like a form of 4D chess where the interrelations are difficult to detect. I have stated many times that I believe President Trump’s goal was to drive a wedge between the countries in the strategic alliance of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
These seemingly unrelated actions, which have been heavily criticized by the media, may in fact have the ultimate goal of driving that wedge between the countries in this strategic alliance. The media likely knew more than I did and had more than just a suspicion.
At the same time, one of the tools in that effort appears to be the attempt to break China’s dominance through the Belt and Road Initiative. That initiative is essentially a form of imperialism that exploits poorer countries.
Clearly, the mainstream media may have seen this as well, which could explain their outrageous behavior. It would be difficult for the reaction to be so coordinated without some deeper alignment of interests — perhaps with the City of London fighting for the survival of its influence.
In a wider perspective, many people can see the corruption within the United Nations, its frequent inaccuracies, and its failure to act as a leading organization on many of the serious questions and problems facing its member states. Could the starting point — the first edition of the Abraham Accord signed in 2020 — together with initiatives such as the “Shield of the Americas” and the “Board of Peace,” eventually replace the United Nations within the next two years, or even this year?
An important implication of such a development is that the veto power in the United Nations Security Council — held by Russia, China, Britain, and France — would effectively be neutralized, freeing the United States from being constrained by that structure.
That veto power remains in place since 1945, when the United Nations was created in the aftermath of World War II — a structure designed to keep the major powers inside the system, but one that many now view as outdated in today’s geopolitical reality.
The replacement of the United Nations — intended to secure peace and prosperity for humanity — may be built brick by brick. reality.
https://t.co/DWhIkunzHC
The Democrats showed exactly where they stand. They deliberately refused to even stand during the State of the Union — a basic sign of respect for the country — and they keep defending illegal criminals instead of standing up for their own citizens.
They don’t just disrespect the American people — they hate them. Their policies lead to more crime, more drug deaths, higher taxes, fewer jobs, and more wars.