@KobeissiLetter When you notice the slight of hand between using averages and then median to mask an apples and oranges argument. Disingenuous framing.
@gfodor@BlueSwampGerald@watson1787 @YameshLaw @BenGoldsmith Classic. Love watching people explain risk informed decision making to alarmists. Then the alarmist try explaining common sense ideologies back. It makes the Wheaties in the morning taste all the better.
@powderbum75@GaijinMommy Objectivity: background radiation is mostly unavoidable. Releasing man made radioactive elements will increase the background radiation and alter the types. That increase is either negligible or it isn't, but it can be compared to today's background levels. Nice and objective.
@stackhodler You've got to ignore a fundamental ideology to have this perspective in investing: future speculation. Then conflate investing with production. And finally think Bitcoin is neither of these things and then both at the same time. Am I taking crazy pills?
Western oil will sustain but not look to grow production. Their debt targets are set. Once achieved, buybacks will be the only remaining target.
Long-term producing assets, solid funds from operations, near ideal leverage... which companies are best aligned for no growth?
@Kanthan2030 The average net worth of all American families wasΒ $746,820, according to the Federal Reserve's 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances, while the median figure was $121,760. Neither of these figures may present a good point of reference for your situation. From https://t.co/49O7SZctJh
@Kanthan2030 This is a master class in skewing the data. Well done. Use medians when it seems to support your point and averages when they're less than the median. You could just compare total assets, nice straight forward or just keep making sophist statements.
@DuchessSexpert If your reasoning is just cause it should be easy then expect easy homes to be built, easy financing weighing on the system, and an easy collapse around every bend.
When you say it like that it does sound easy.
@DanielBenincas2@BitcoinPierre@LynAldenContact Strawman. A state's need for involvement, which I think we agree on, does not mean absolution. I'd reckon it means you know who to blame when the power isn't there or the costs explode. Which brings us to incentive programs and the malfunctioning markets created thereby.
@jamieclimate I'd rather energy policy not incentivize renewables as a replacement for existing power supplies (even Texas has energy issues due to US govs incentive programs, tax breaks for them and you can expect less power in the mean time.)