JR

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en Hello, are you aware of this website error?

[JR @JRSCGW]

@mcinnes_danny Happy to hear it.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@donwinslow These two look like fraternal twins separated at birth.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en Are the reports published in Japanese, English, or both? Thank you

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en Thank you.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en Ok, that is a new concept to me, that wave 1 can be also a three-wave “leading diagonal” not necessarily a five-wave impulse. Thank you again

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en What mean to say is: I agree what you label here as 1 of (1) is clearly impulsive, yet you count it as three wave. Maybe three-wave impulse is no problem? I am humble student.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ewrij225en Pardon my ignorance, but how can 1 of (1) be composed of (w)(x)(y), if it is impulsive not corrective? Thank you

[JR @JRSCGW]

@SportsCardNFTs @trader1sz Sorry, I thought you guys meant “is this a thing that residents of New York City engage with” - If that’s the question, then no. But if this is something else, have fun. I wasn’t trying to be an ass.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@trader1sz @SportsCardNFTs It isn’t.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@MirageMogul MARA is my vote

[JR @JRSCGW]

@Seniorstrategen @luke_1977hk Maybe data processing power = commodity?

[JR @JRSCGW]

@traderpodcaste Nice

[JR @JRSCGW]

@ThetaWarrior $OUNZ, spot ETF by VanEck, which they say can be redeemed for physical gold, but brokers I’ve spoken to have all said they could not do that. Has anyone heard differently?

[JR @JRSCGW]

@paxtrader777 Hello - I caught part of a live Spaces, but not all of it. Are they still available somewhere, or only live? Thanks

[JR @JRSCGW]

@TheEconomist I bet the amount of beef wasted (not even eaten) by corporate fast food chains FAR exceeds the amount eaten by normal people at their own homes. Better to regulate those wasteful business models than limit a human food staple itself.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@kareem_carr Aristotelian categories for the “win” then, but what is won? Are all syllogisms tautologies? Does a slogan’s formal validity have anything to do with its function?

[JR @JRSCGW]

@kareem_carr Both of your formalizations are possible from the original sentence, and that ambiguity is precisely the issue of public debate: whether the category “woman” refers univocally to biological women, or includes trans women as an equivocal subset.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@etradingshorts Brother in Cap, you also read Jung.

[JR @JRSCGW]

@AllwynFelix @McClellanOsc @DavidBCollum Good to know, thank you