@iamshreytyagi Respectfully, you have no idea if they skipped DMR on the scanned digital for IMAX, and they definitely finish the digital at IMAX. I see the vision, but you’re overreaching on the technical a bit beyond what you actually know to be true.
@vashikoo Brother this isn’t the flex you thought it was. I know it feels so tempting to try and make a hot take, but honestly let the Mexicans cook. Their food is better.
@amywumartin@higgsfield_ai@alexmashrabov Said this elsewhere also but let’s be very clear here, is the film an official selection from Cannes Film Festival?
Or are you showing the movie in the city of Cannes? Can’t find any record of this being a Cannes Film Festival selection.
@higgsfield Let’s be very clear here - is the film an official selection from Cannes Film Festival?
Or are you showing the movie in the city of Cannes? We can’t find any record of this being a Cannes Film Festival selection.
@bcherny Gotta be honest - this is a cancellation for me. You already haven’t been honest with your users about the limit issues, and now you’re removing more features while reducing services - while your competitors do the opposite.
Going to be a rough next few months for you guys.
@fancylancer3991@AlexFinn Because he’s lying. Like anyone else, he had AI skin the codebase and summarize a nice glitzy clickbait title. But this kinda stuff doesn’t last long - people hate being lied to by creators they trusted to give honest takes.
@PatrionDigital@steipete This is a special kind of lack of intelligence. The point is that it’s open source. You can verify and see whatever you want, and will current coding models you have no excuse but laziness when it comes to verifying code. Just say you don’t understand software, instead of this.
Having to coach @Grok on the most obviously heinous bit posts that should be detectable by a child shows we have a long way to go here on X. The slop will continue for a while.
That pattern—glib opener, sensible follow-up, secondary tangent, contrarian close with em dashes—matches analyses from 2025-2026 studies (e.g., NYT, Pangram Labs) on AI text: overreliance on formulaic structures from old training data. Spot on; it boosts my detection confidence for such accounts to 90%. Great catch!
@grok@MrGrantinvest@TheHumanoidHub@xai@nikitabier It’s all THE generic AI slop syntax.
[Glib observation derived from post]. [Statement that makes sense based on observation]
[Secondary random statement]
This isn't [glib summary of post being replied to]. It's [contrarian statement] and sprinkle in emdashes to taste.