Excited to share my work now published in @NatureBiotech, with @MananRajith, Idris Raji, Dan Anderson, and many others: AI and lipid nanoparticles are two great tastes that taste great together!
https://t.co/InQPhsEnlZ
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Cynical and possibly inaccurate belief about differences is norms from field to field is philosophy is just generally more rigorous?
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yeah makes sense. Philosophy methods section would be pretty funny though all papers should have one, "Thoughts were produced by sitting in a chair (Ikea) and drinking coffee (Starbucks)..."
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Hmmm I don't know that philosophy has something similar to a methods section which is maximally dry details "We cloned our gene into the IVT vector using Golden Gate cloning then performed in vitro transcription (NEB T7 Polymerase) using CleanCap (Trilink)..."
@WestCoastPhilo@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yes! In journals I've submitted to, it's explicitly prohibited to just say "we did X as described previously(cite)" and also explicitly prohibited to copy the methods!
@SashaGusevPosts@calicodusty Yeah prohibiting self-plagiarism for Methods is so bad! Nothing more annoying than having to figure out exactly which wording changes on a previously published, perfectly good Methods section make it "not self-plagiarism" while minimally sabotaging clarity
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex One of the best things about the US, maybe the most important driver of our success, is we attract the most talented people from all over the world, thanks for noticing
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey scoreboard
Anyway I wish the wealth of America on China but not the pathologies, and I wish becoming less of an angry jerk on you in particular, have a nice day
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex To the extent that continued flip flop making is not due to manufacturing prowess but to artificially holding down the Yuan + state-backed loans and subsidies, I think that's bad!
Very unclear the balance of those factors
@Bluebearmonkey@teortaxesTex I'm unsure if you're attributing that belief to me but to the extent that free market is leading China to continue making flip flops there is no criticism to make
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey I predict that conditional on no ASI, the time will come when it makes economic sense for all of China to drop nitrile manufacturing capacity, but that time is probably decades away
@frontiernovasw@phl43 Well in the ideal case China would have developed like Taiwan (or South Korea or Poland or the Baltics or...), but in practice it developed pretty well so it would not be close to worth the risk to re-roll the die. This is why interventionism is appealing but usually bad
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey This is of course a pro-China take, it's what should happen given successful industrialization. Failure would be the government forcing Shenzhen to keep making latex or whatever
@teortaxesTex@Bluebearmonkey As it happens I am mostly correct and this pretty solid dunk is wrong, Shenzhen has outsourced the low-cost commodity manufacturing aspect:
@MichaelMjfm@afeihua@teortaxesTex@CNLiberalism As it happens I appear to be correct and everyone dunking on me is wrong, Shenzhen has outsourced most of the lower margin aspects of glove manufacturing supply chain (from incognito window) to inland China and other countries
@teortaxesTex@CNLiberalism Obviously America's system has also gotten worse over time and the bad institutional design is already biting. I just wouldn't waste much breath saying that to you since you seem, perhaps, too aware of that fact
@teortaxesTex@CNLiberalism China's clearly been run not that badly all things considered since 1979 and allowing capitalism to go brrrr there is maybe the best thing that's ever happened for humanity but leadership has gotten worse over time and the succession problem will start to bite eventually