@RealSirDamon@MattWallace888 bro it could have EASILY been the shooter she shot. She has exactly 0.000001s to determine weather it wad the shooter standing over her or not. What planet do you live on where you cant see that? A planet where women tortured you and u cant see past that or something?
@iwearahoodie@joseph_postma@Anc_Aesthetics Ya but if that was indeed the shooter and she didnt shoot:
Not only would she be executed, point blank...
But she also could have shot him and stopped him from killing others.
And if that were you, and that was the shooter not the rabbi, you'd be dead, point blank.
@jabronidonnie@DesertCity66@beyoncegarden The fundamental problem with trying to debate a never Trumper / far lefty, is they refuse to engage with anyone who could actually give them a proper debate. Il
Instead they watch videos of people incable of holding even a steady job down let alone articulate.
@BigSweaty_7@jedigoodman 1. its not polymarket.
2. Polymarket doesnt accept bets. Another human trader would have to accept the bet. Polymarket just takes a small fee.
@BastardSword17@barrydoherty54@ArmanUfc 1. Its illegal for him to bet on this sport, hes literally in the league.
2. Its illegal to place bets on behalf of others.
3. Fake slips have become a daily occurrence constantly some celebs.
Add a little skit, and all of a sudden you make people forget the first 3 points.
@Dr_Gigachads_Rx@paleochristcon its the lighting combined with the camera that creates the glitch, not just the lighting itself. if u were there irl ud see nothing abnormal. its the camera that changes the equation.
@Dw1720410@paleochristcon bro camera glitches like this arent supposed to look normal. thats why theyre called glitches. cuz they look totally physically unworldly.
@PlaceCrazy23@AlphaPulseGlobe@RyanRozbiani nah feel free to believe ur eyes, just target them on the thousands of other cases of this camera effect happening to real people all the time. that'll catch u up to the rest of us.
@MWingless@skywalker3819r@andy_buksterlin Option A:
Its an unintentional camera effect/glitch.
Option B:
Its a mask and a grand conspiracy that no one can explain bc no one has any idea why a guy with a mask would need to be on FOX News saying whatever he said.