@ThePureDrop@Woman4W Just quickly browsed his Wikipedia did you and now pretending you care so to not look the hypocrite?
You're so see-through you may as well be transparent.
@ThePureDrop@Woman4W Oh yeah? Your timeline appears to be exclusively feminist causes.
I also searched your timeline and there isn't one mention of Jack Letts. Seems you only care if the person is female.
Two steps ahead of you every move ๐
Now go ahead and pretend you care about Jack Letts.
@ThePureDrop@Woman4W I'm not coping. You don't seem to understand that my side has won. She was stripped of her British citizenship and every court possible has upheld it. You only care because you're an "uppity feminist" and want to defend a woman no matter how indefensible your position is.
@Woman4W@ThePureDrop Also, X is a public platform and you don't get to choose who is "welcome" in "your" thread, you authoritarian. The fact that you're hiding my replies shows me everything I need to know about you. Pathetic. And you're know your losing the argument.
@ThePureDrop@Woman4W I'm perfectly calm. And my arguments have been far more rational and logical than yours. You haven't provided a legal reason why she is British, or a cultural one, or an ethnic one, or one based on ancestry, or history.
She was never more than an interloper in my country.
@ThePureDrop@Woman4W Not ethically British either. Ethical Brits don't betray their country, abscond and join a terrorist group, marry a terrorist, laugh about decapitated heads, or celebrate the murder of innocent civilians.
Like I say, literally nothing makes her British.
@John_R_Shepard@RichardDawkins Your Constitution is directly based on the English Magna Carta (1215), the English Bill of Rights (1689), the English Habeas Corpus Act (1679), and the English Petition of Right (1628).