I'm extremely chuffed to announce that my new article 'Moral Experience: Perception or Emotion?' is out now in @EthicsJournal
Available here: https://t.co/xySbecgTX0
@NikVenkatesh Very interesting piece, thanks for sharing
(fyi I think there might be a little typo in the title of IIa. "Scepticism about the tractability [OF] systemic change")
Big up Alice Munro. I read this collection about 10 years ago & I now literally get goosebumps reading the wikipedia synopses, they're that vividly lodged in my memory. I've never read short stories as breathtaking as hers.
⚠️Two more PhD positions available within our programme at the University of Twente!
✴️a PhD on Reconceiving Rights, Duties, and Wellbeing amidst technological and ecological challenges, supervised by Dominic Lenzi & @JamesHuttonPhil. Deadline: 6 June 📅 https://t.co/I96dJDjOVZ
Cool citizen science project for anyone who likes watching videos of pigs, to help classify data from a project recording natural behaviours in free-roaming pigs
https://t.co/j0mOXClvMu
@DavidBahry You see my point though, right! I guess it's that he makes it clear how the technical-seeming stuff connects with the Big Questions. Maybe most of us are too happy to leave those connections off the page. Or we slowly forget about the Big Questions in the flurry of R&Rs 😢
I'm going to carry on taking Huberman seriously (read: eating my blueberries) ∵
-He quickly, humbly admitted his error.
-It's pretty easy to fall into probabilistic fallacies, especially when you're talking without a script & trying to make things sound simple. Who hasn't?
I strive to get things right on the podcast, and if I don’t, I do hope people will point it out. I re-record audio to correct it and post corrections in the show note captions on all platforms and pinned comments on YouTube. Below is the correction now posted for the fertility episode.
At the timestamp related to cumulative probability of pregnancy (2:01:30), I made a math error.
The appropriate equation is 1-(1-p)^n where p is the probability of getting pregnant in a given cycle, and n is the cycle number.
Therefore the equation for this scenario is
1-(0.8^6).
Using the equation, cumulative probability over 6 cycles is 73.8% (rounded to 3 significant figures).
@Declan_OGara 😲 Did it actually look this amazing to the eye or is there some long exposure enhancement going on? (I've heard mixed messages from the kids in Uppsala on this front.)
Editing tip: Keep an eye for any paragraphs in your manuscript that deal with things whereof one cannot speak. Passing over them in silence is a great way to keep that word count down! ✅
Trying to reduce your paper's word count? Other tip - apostrophe instead of 'of': "The argument of the paper" becomes "the paper's argument." Two words gone like that!
Me: Here's how to use reasoning to think a bit more carefully about the ethics of technologies.
Engineering students: Can we make this idea of "logically following" more precise? And don't we need more ethical premises to support our ethical premises and so on ∞?🤯
Me:
@TUDelft
@ProfLauraSilva@EPSSE1 @letras_ulisboa @ifilnova Looking forward to meeting you too! Very much hoping to make it to the preconf, but see you at the main thing if not
Climate action requires technical knowledge & ethical understanding.
Join @JamesHuttonPhil in conversation w/John Broome as they delve into the philosophical underpinnings of climate action:
📅21 May at 17-19 CEST
📍TU Delft | The Hague Campus
https://t.co/s7xCsUHh3Q
I'm excited to by welcoming John Broome (Oxford) to TU Delft | The Hague Campus, for an evening of conversation about the ethics of climate action ☀️💨🌊🌳🚄🍎
Please share far and wide 😉
@tudelft@esdit_nl@4TUethics@BehnamTaebi
Absolutely loving @JeffrSebo's 𝗦𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗠𝗔𝗟𝗦, 𝗦𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗦. One of those books that simultaneously makes want to (a) spend several lifetimes reflecting on fundamental philosophical questions and (b) change the world.