In 2008, I filmed a UFO on my old LG flip phone in South Wales - it was completely invisible to the naked eye, yet clearly visible on the phone screen.
Around the same time, a South Wales police helicopter was forced to take evasive action to avoid colliding into a similar object.
When the History Channel’s UFO Hunters team arrived to investigate, they interviewed me and took my raw footage. However, both my full interview and the actual footage were left out of the final episode.
I believe this happened because I described the UAP as a "spiritual phenomenon" - what many now call interdimensional - instead of the space aliens they expected.
After staying silent for many years, I’ve finally decided to share the full, uncut story... including the footage UFO Hunters didn't show you.
Watch the video and tell me honestly - was this just normal TV editing... or did they deliberately bury a story that didn’t fit their narrative?
#ufo #uap #nhi #interdimensional #nonhuman #extraterrestrial #ufohunters
Eve and Adam are the first case and origin of innocent children being groomed by an older and wiser care-giver, the archangel Lucifer, who engaged in unnatural lust (with immature humans) and in doing so became the devil and satan. We can understand how confusing that must have been for them, as they had complete trust in the archangel whom God had created for a good purpose.
Ultimately, if Eve had said no to the archangel when he tempted her then the Fall would not have happened, or if Adam had said no to Eve after she had already fallen with the archangel and was trying to tempt him then Eve could have been relatively easily restored without affecting the rest of humanity by passing down this "original sin" to their descendants through the lineage.
God told them to say "no" once He saw the archangel was intent on pursuing his unGodly objectives, but we should understand how incredibly difficult this was for them. Even today, people risk their lives and religious leaders fall due to sexual sin.
...bcos social consensus has always proven to be correct? You've gonna be kidding me, right?
Edwin Hubble, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Friedrich Miescher, Rosalind Franklin, James Watson & Francis Crick, Ignaz Semmelweis... were all thought to be "crazy" and had their ideas rejected by their 'peers' but it's not like they didn't have any evidence to back their claims, is it? Do you want more examples?
@grok does Professor Thomas Seyfried's research and experimental data support the hypothesis that cancer is caused by mitochondria dysfunction based on glucose and glutamine fermentation and that associated genetic mutations are secondary downstream effects rather than the primary cause of cancer?
@tyromper I appreciate you 🙏 and I have a bit of a podcast... interviewed Sharon Lechter, Dr. John Demartini, Lady JB Owen, Sir Darren Jacklin, and others. Should really start sharing the episodes here on X. How about I interview you? Would you be up for that? 👍
Morally bankrupt, values deficient, lacking good character...
Also...
Depraved: Completely corrupt, wicked, or perverted.
Unprincipled: Lacking moral rules, ethics, or scruples.
Degenerate: Having declined to a corrupt and immoral state.
Amoral: Completely indifferent to right and wrong.
Perfidious: Treacherous, untrustworthy, and completely lacking integrity.
Not objections against Christianity but against common misunderstandings within modern Christian teachings, for example: that Jesus was born perfect when Hebrews says he was made perfect through his obedience to the Word of the Oath while undergoing the suffering of all manner of temptation and that on that day God said to Jesus "Today, I have become your Father". See my first article on my account for a full read.