@Dar_Lyons91@ShaneFox12 That’s debatable. It would have been soft enough. But in the same vein Dublin should not have had a penalty either. So one team gets the soft penalty and the other doesn’t. It’s inconsistent.
@Dar_Lyons91@ShaneFox12 No they showed it on Sunday game - his hand remained in the air playing advantage until after Maher gained possession. So essentially ref decided no foul on Maher and went back
@Dar_Lyons91@ShaneFox12 At the other end the ref kept his arm in the air after the ball came back off the post ie he’s still playing advantage when Maher takes possession so if you agree Maher was then fouled it’s a penalty.
@Dar_Lyons91@ShaneFox12 Because in your scenario, even if the foul doesn’t happen he still has to go around Silke and that takes him into the path of Hernon who is covering.
@EwanMacKenna@GeorgeLeeRTE My fave pt In climate models is margin of error in amount of water vapour I.e. cloud is greater than the total impact of human emissions. In other words the relative impact of human made emissions is so small that slight errors in the total quantity of cloud offsets its impact!
@EwanMacKenna@GeorgeLeeRTE My fave pt In climate models is margin of error in amount of water vapour I.e. cloud is greater than the total impact of human emissions. In other words the relative impact of human made emissions is so small that slight errors in the total quantity of cloud offsets its impact!
@GadSaad Given you are not willing to be swayed in your own view on Israel, by your own logic you should not debate anyone on it at all. The irony that you suffer (and are blissfully unaware) from your own defined fallacy is incredible.
@PiersUncensored@piersmorgan@DrGaborMate@GadSaad As Gad himself is not willing to be swayed in his view on Israel, by his own logic he should not debate anyone on it at all. The irony that he suffers (and appears blissfully unaware) from his own defined fallacy is incredible.
@goshechkin@PiersUncensored@piersmorgan@DrGaborMate@GadSaad He destroyed no one here. He himself is not willing to be swayed in his view on Israel so by his own logic he should not debate anyone on it at all. The irony that he suffers from his own defined fallacy is incredible.
@Zeev81309559 Deplorable analysis. You could justify any number of child deaths by arguing that it’s below children’s proportion of the population. That children are being targeted is obvious from the data and the case studies. It does not preclude that non children civilians are also targeted
@SmallerFishGAA I think the league is the best it’s been - there’s real jeopardy and rewards at stake so it would be a backward step to change that. I think the issue is condensed championship - not working,
@EwanMacKenna@EoinA10466@Clay4MainStreet That isn’t how they extrapolated. I think it’s likely an overestimate also but you should really read the detail before commenting.