@ItsMissShorty We don't have to agree with everything a lawyer does just because they are an amazing lawyer. Humans are fallable. He doesn't seem to be the most technically inclined.
The Case That Patrick Carried Lindsay's Phone
An argument from the device telemetry record.
At 5:23:52 PM Lindsay's Watch records its last sample of anything. Her phone is never unlocked again. Eight minutes later Patrick walks into a store on camera, and her phone, supposedly back at the house, registers a climb as he steps through the door, then another as he steps back out. Odds against: about 1 in 976.
The question
Between 5:15 PM and 6:11 PM, Lindsay's iPhone kept registering activity. Lindsay produced no biometric signal during that hour and never authenticated the device. So whose body was the phone on?
There is one interval where this can be tested. For four minutes and thirty-six seconds, Patrick's location is fixed by store surveillance rather than by anything he said. Whatever the phone did in those four minutes is as close to a controlled experiment as this case gets.
The record goes quiet
Lindsay's iPhone was last authenticated at 5:15:12 PM.
Her Apple Watch kept reporting for eight more minutes. Heart rate 77 at 5:16:02. Then 57 at 5:23:52. That is the final biometric sample in the record. The Watch samples every five to ten minutes at rest, so by 5:33 it had missed two expected readings. It had also logged no flights climbed since 4:56:47, having logged them steadily all afternoon.
From roughly 5:24 onward there is no authentication, no recorded heart rate, and no wrist-side motion. The sensor strapped to her body stops producing data of any kind.
The phone does not.
There is no location data
Everything else depends on this.
For the whole period in question, nothing places Lindsay's handset anywhere. No GPS fix. No WiFi association after the morning. The only geographic anchor in the entire evening belongs to Patrick, and it comes from a camera rather than a device.
The obvious remedy does not help either. The store sits about three minutes from the house. At that range the phone is almost certainly inside the same tower's footprint, quite possibly the same sector, whether it is on a kitchen counter or in a coat pocket walking into a shop. Cell site records resolve neighbourhoods. They were never built to separate two points three minutes apart, and asking them to do it here would be asking for precision they do not have.
That inverts the usual hierarchy. Location data cannot answer this question. The barometric record can, because it responds to the air immediately around the handset rather than to a tower miles away. Of everything available, it is the only evidence that discriminates at all.
Two registrations inside a verified absence
Surveillance places Patrick inside the store from 5:32:32 to 5:37:08. During that window Lindsay's iPhone logs two flights climbed, in an entry running from 5:33:34 to 5:38:33. The first registers 62 seconds after he crosses in. The second registers 85 seconds after he crosses out.
A registration of this kind requires a sustained pressure change at the device. The sensor is barometric. It reads the air around the handset rather than the movement of it.
@FoundationDads Children dehydrate my quickly than adults. Instead of debating the issue here, ask a pediatric sports medicine doctor. I've seen my child's face start to turn purple in excessive heat--pretty sure that isn't healthy.
@MrDanielBuck I think there is a balance. There have to be ways that parents are helping their kids outside of school if they expect the school system to help as well. How about more recess? Would this help everyone? That is one place to start. Even 15 minutes in the afternoon.
@educator4ever36 Get the behavior under control in the classrooms. That is where the school system can start. Support principals and teachers to have clear consequences and follow through. Start having students repeat kindergarten, first, or second grade if they need to.
@ECGreaves@srrichey Yeah, I don't know what money was used for the mega screen, but im guessing it was only for Football. What happened to the Champaign arena they were supposed to build for hockey, volleyball, gymnastics and wrestling?
@graysp_ace I think the point is that there is so much more discovery that you can get in a civil suit, which can then also be used in a criminal suit. It's been mentioned many times in the Karen Read civil suit that is ongoing.
@DrJosefWD I am curious how you differentiate neuroinflammation from vaccines versus neuroinflammation from common viruses, bacteria, etc. Is your theory that neuroinflammation from vaccines somehow differs from that of non-vaccine sources?