Very excited for the publication of “Handbook of Evidence-Based Inpatient Mental Health Programs for Children and Adolescents” and especially proud of chapter 5 (+ my personal special interest section on diagnostic disparities in restraint/seclusion use)! https://t.co/xK77gIzzr4
I appreciate the reasons for open science requirements, but a journal asking for access to a read-only version of one’s data in order for reviewers to review a paper when participants did not consent to this & the reviewers don’t have IRB approval makes me uncomfortable.
I just spent $400 for a conference registration. The financial burden to present research to only a handful of people seems increasingly unjustifiable to me. This is yet another way that academia harshly punishes students from low SES and we need to do better.
Study of faculty searches at R1 university finds committees consider women's—but not men's—relationship status in hiring. Women w/ high-status partners were considered not 'movable' & excluded from offers when there were male or single female alternatives.https://t.co/99HsfkUDh1
From a graduate psychology program recommendation portal:
“Please describe any physical characteristics that you believe may be important to the applicant’s success” 👀Really people??
If you are a college student who likes to nod intently at your professors while they're talking in class, just know that all of them adore you and think you are the absolute greatest
@RayaKhedker There’s a couple of studies on this. One (Rogowski et al., 2016) noted no statistical difference between the two. There is another study I recall, but the name escapes me and I can’t find it, that I think did some fMRI work on it. I want to say they found similar activation(?).