Johan Gamper

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

News – Adalja. Some attacks on independent integrative attempts concerning psychiatry and philosophy. Non biological mental energy of the experiencing subject. No surprise. The biggest supplier of psychiatric care in the Nordic countries. https://t.co/CFX5W3wMVo

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@psychgeist52 I have some new ideas on posters at the WPC in September.

[James Barnes MSc., MA @psychgeist52]

"What AI Will Never Do." My new @PsychToday article explores why AI will never be able to do therapy:

AI can simulate empathy, and it can simulate therapy. But it doesn't actually do either, as it doesn't understand and it cannot relate 👇

https://t.co/xDwniwiKH7

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

Causal Principles in Material Constitution: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Composition of Objects - Article (Preprint v2) by Johan Gamper | Qeios https://t.co/gPYTuWDMxm

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

On a Loophole in Quantum Gravity - Article (Preprint v4) by Johan Gamper | Qeios https://t.co/prVJ0vLZ3w

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@PhysInHistory Johan Gamper. (2023). Metaphysics uniting theology and science — back to the basics (as in back to the basic assumptions). Qeios. doi:10.32388/JS5Z04.2.

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

“We define a set of things of one singular kind as the set of all things that can causally affect one another. To enable causal interaction between such sets, we define a thing that is of a non-singular kind as consisting of more than one singular kind.” https://t.co/1ABwh81yOM

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@PhysInHistory Det blir ju lite så.

[Dr John Read @ReadReadj]

Child abuse and psychosis. 1997.
Identified 6 ways the relationship is minimised.
Some still happening in 2024.
@BentallProf @FilippoVarese @Mad_In_America @MITUKteam
@JDaviesPhD @IndigoDaya @psychgeist52
https://t.co/CBd8MpCQ1m

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@jordicat Good job! If you’re interested I’ve tried to find a foundation for the next step, to unite science and theology. The key I’m exploring is to expand the number of basic assumptions. (Gamper, 2023, https://t.co/FSBGoPOSdJ.

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@JoshuaLWatson Identity: (Gamper 2021). Biological Energy and the Experiencing Subject. Axiomathes 31, 497–506 (2021). https://t.co/rHz32v3OGe, Theseus: Gamper (2023). Interstellar Variations 1: Plan B and Causal Objects. Qeios. doi:10.32388/XZ2MD6.2. Both need some more work to be honest.

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@anitaleirfall Yes! But it is solvable, though. In this paper I let it be about whether we can save causal closure without giving up on the possibility of dualism/pluralism. https://t.co/9m3bwS8oEw

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@keithfrankish @JohnRGregg3 Typical! Bad news for the ‘interface-idea’. ‘Manifestating’ seems more modern.

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@waldenpod … like seeing and hearing? The difference, though, is that we know what it is that sees and hears, the biological object. But what is the experiencing subject that has conscious sensations? Or is there no such?

[Kim Caudell @kfcaudell]

@JoyceCarolOates "I am very poorly today & very stupid & hate everybody & everything."

Charles Darwin
Letter to Charles Lyell
1st October 1861

[Anita Leirfall @anitaleirfall]

Marshall McLuhan nailed it already in 1977. #surveillance #noprivacy

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

If you (actually) allow things made up of things of more than one kind of things a domain of the latter kind can permit coexistence of, say, mathematical and physical things, without violating causal closure.

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

@JohnRGregg3

Hi John,
Thanks for sharing your book. I especially noticed this passage:

“This is what we are shooting for. I want a theory that says consciousness just is X, with no remainder. Is that fair?”

[Johan Gamper @JohanGamper]

There is a way around it but then you must break with the tradition that goes back to the ancient Greeks.