@cryptofrontio NYSE or other exchanges using Avalanche doesn’t necessarily create meaningful demand for $AVAX.
They can run their own Avalanche L1, use their own token/stablecoin for gas, and pay Ava Labs/AvaCloud for the infrastructure.
@KirkEdward43401@Glinner I don't know what he said but i think this is one of the major problems these days.
You don't have to agree with everything someone has said to agree with something they are currently saying
@PeterMcCormack@DaddyCoffee73 20mph zones in villages and near schools etc is fine with me if it was back up to 30 at night. Doesn’t make sense when the roads are nearly empty and very few pedestrians especially children
@PatriotDrew777@economicninja This is the problem with being a doomsday predicter. You could end up sitting on the sidelines for decades waiting for the wheels to fall off
@TullMcAdoo @Ryanair@elonmusk People would definitely pay £1 for high speed, high data allowance internet for sure. You have to pay more than that to opt in to an SMS flight reminder! We wouldnt pay because it wouldnt be £1 and it wouldnt be fast or reliable
@CsTominaga@BitcoinNewsCom This is nice word soup but money lending is a different problem from money printing. LN and custodial wallets do not print bitcoin which is why I said it fixes the money printer problem
And self-custody is still a security risk which is why we need banks
@CsTominaga@BitcoinNewsCom Bitcoin fixed the one thing that actually mattered, no more moneyprinter. Now we can rebuild nonfractional, competitive, global banks on a hard 21 M base layer. Most wealth always ends up custodied, question is only whether the foundation beneath the custodians is sound or rotten
@brt2412@GhostofWhitman i dont think its 'completely' goes against. Bitcoin was created to stop money printing and the theft of wealth. It doesn't mean banks dont have a place, just that central banks cant do whatever they want
@TomThomasTM@NewsAsset With your logic he wouldn’t have held for 15 years as there was numerous bubbles and consolidations he could’ve taken his bitcoin ‘off the table’
@champtgram because its annoying and confusing to not know whether or not the receiver of your text will get an imessage or an SMS and creates issues in group chats when sending videos and other attachments
@hirbod@champtgram SMS has been free in EU & US before smartphones. whatsapp was successful as it was an instant messenger that didnt rely on SMS so users didnt have to worry about character limits or file size issues of sending photos and videos. But mostly cos it worked on apple and android