#Qubic's deficit of mining power, used for #AI training, has led to an unexpected discovery.
We have found a way to train AI faster without adding more mining power. Hard to believe, but, unlike saying "Just stop being poor" to poor people, instructing AI to train faster does work.
Looks like we are updating the mining algo soon...
@JensenHuang@ChaseLochmiller@OpenAI@sama Could you confirm that you did deliver AGI? I want to see what letters (ASI? AHI?) you'll be using for selling new models.
Buy the Exchange vs Build the Chain and decentralisation 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
Buy the Exchange vs Build the Chain
$Robinhood with Bitstamp
Bought 14 years of compliance.
50+ licenses. Instant UK access.
Frontend = Robinhood. Backend = Bitstamp.
Accounts still separate.
Crypto comes to 20M users through regulation.
$QUBIC
Built Outsourced Computation.
Roadmap → Mainnet.
1,455 invocations live.
451/676 Computors sign every action.
Smart Contracts = Brain
Oracles = Senses
OC = Hands ← now acting
No middleman. Just math.
The difference:
One bought infrastructure to fit the old system $Robinhood
One built infrastructure for a new system. $Qubic
Robinhood says " Distribution first".
$QUBIC says Computation first.
Most people will see Robinhood first.
The agents will run on $QUBIC first.
Which side are you on? Or are you on both sides ?
@Adi_bulls@_Qubic_ Well I’m not sure about cfb’s statement🤔. It seemed a lil bit vague. Here is why… Currently$Qubic is at 6 zeros,”2026” any move lower than current price level in “2027” will fulfill CFB statement. “ is it kinda good @c___f___b what else to make of your comnt? HODLn regardless🚀
$QUBIC is going through a test that money cannot buy right now. Not a market test, not a campaign. The judgment of peers. Its scientific research was just awarded in Osaka, and will be presented this week in San Francisco. Here is why it matters more than it seems.
The technocrat transhumanists are not the “Elite”
They are merely stewards of the realm, and they maintain that role because they have loyalty to each other
We have an opportunity to remember that we can choose loyalty to each other too
This is their “secret”
@WatersAbve
$LUNC hitting $80 or $119? That’s not hype — that’s misinformation. And it needs to stop.
Spreading unrealistic price targets creates false expectations and damages the credibility we’ve spent 4+ years rebuilding.
This community is focused on real progress — restoring trust, attracting developers, and strengthening the ecosystem.
We are NOT a meme. We don’t grow on false promises.
Let’s protect what we’re building and keep expectations grounded.
#LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #BuildNotHype #Web3
Terra Luna Classic ( $LUNC ) seems to be quietly moving behind the scenes… but this calm often precedes the storm 🚀🔥
There are subtle signs that a big surprise may be on the way, and it could become the talk of the town on social media this year 📈🌍💣 $LUNC IS BACK 📉🚀🚀🚀🚀
As I mentioned before, today we're going to talk about a project I quickly fell in love with: $QUBIC
$qubic tries to solve a very simple problem:
Today, many networks use mining to waste energy solving calculations that only serve to protect the network.
@_Qubic_ proposes something different:
👉 using that mining power to perform useful computing, especially related to AI. #AIGARTH
They call it uPoW: Useful Proof of Work.
The interesting thing is that they don't want to start from scratch.
They're trying to attract existing power:
First, $xmr miners, who use CPUs.
Now, $doge miners, who use ASICs.
The idea is:
if there's already a lot of mining power distributed around the world, why not redirect it towards useful tasks?
That's why QUBIC isn't just about "another coin."
It's about turning mining into computing infrastructure.
And if AI requires increasingly more energy and processing power in the future, this thesis could become very important.
To give you an idea of what @_Qubic_ is like, here's the CV of @c___f___b, a genius in this field.
On the other hand, here are some profiles you can follow if you're interested in the project:
@albefero@THE_chosen_CHAD@rudynakamoto@Drac_Crypto_vlc
> be $QUBIC
> born from a BitcoinTalk post in 2012
> before most of crypto even existed
> the idea belongs to one man
> Sergey Ivancheglo
> alias: Come-from-Beyond
> software engineer from Belarus
> obsessed with computer games as a kid
> evolved into distributed computing and AI
> BSc in electronics and artificial intelligence
> codes in everything
> Assembler, C, Java, Python, the full stack
> first known internet footprint: 2002
> publishes "Distributed computing with minimal costs"
> twenty years before the rest of crypto catches up
> mines Bitcoin in 2009
> one of the earliest miners alive
> there before the industry existed
> 2013: creates NXT
> the first full Proof-of-Stake blockchain
> not a Bitcoin fork, built from scratch
> NXT is cited in the Ethereum whitepaper
> Vitalik studied it
> the foundation under the foundation
> projects like Monero draw inspiration from NXT
> the man's fingerprints are on everything
> and nobody outside crypto knows his name
> 2015: co-founds IOTA
> invents the Tangle
> the first DAG-based ledger, no blocks, no chain
> feeless transactions at scale
> designed for the Internet of Things
> the architecture is years ahead of its time
> joins the IOTA Foundation board in 2018
> the project grows massive
> but the politics grow faster
> internal conflict with David Sønstebø
> public fallout in 2019
> claims he's owed 25 trillion IOTA tokens
> leaves IOTA
> walks away from the project he helped build
> the pattern is familiar
> but the idea never left
> Qubic was mentioned in 2012
> before NXT, before IOTA, before everything
> the name goes back further than any of his projects
> the concept of Useful Proof-of-Work
> first discussed by CFB in 2002
> the endgame was always Qubic
> NXT was a stepping stone
> IOTA was a stepping stone
> launches Qubic as an independent project
> open source, community-driven
> no VC funding, no pre-mine, no central control
> anti-military license
> the code can't be used for war
> a philosophical line in the sand
> 676 Computors form the Quorum
> 451 must agree to finalize anything
> two-thirds majority, every time
> transactions are feeless
> finality is sub-second
> 15.5 million TPS verified on mainnet by CertiK
> fastest blockchain ever verified
> not on a testnet
> on mainnet
> Useful Proof-of-Work
> miners don't solve meaningless puzzles
> the compute power trains AI
> Aigarth
> an AI system built on Qubic
> designed to let artificial intelligence emerge from the network
> "AI will not be created, it will emerge.
> with help of Qubic miners."
> that's CFB's thesis
> smart contracts launch through IPOs
> the community votes on what gets built
> QUBIC spent on launches gets burned
> no whitepaper yet
> the tech is "too revolutionary" to finalize
> they're still reinventing components
> the man who built the first PoS chain
> the man who built the first DAG
> is now building a chain that turns mining into AI training
> three decades of distributed computing
> three landmark crypto projects
> and the final one is the one he always wanted to build
mined Bitcoin in 2009
built the first Proof-of-Stake blockchain
co-invented the Tangle for IOTA
left it all behind
and came back with the project he first imagined in 2002
the man who inspired Ethereum's whitepaper
is building something nobody's copied yet
because nobody understands it yet