Do you ever feel like facilitation practices seem like some form of illegitimate grift practiced as a way to control the frame?
If you sometimes feel this way, I feel like I can offer a few klews π§Άπ§΅π
@innerpathing What is the context and why? (I've wondered about sovereignty vs agency - also liking the term "self organizing" for facilitation which sounds related to your insight)
If you resonate with this commentary, perhaps reach out. You can also get in contact further or share my services with others via:
https://t.co/1XFPruGsDY
Do you ever feel like facilitation practices seem like some form of illegitimate grift practiced as a way to control the frame?
If you sometimes feel this way, I feel like I can offer a few klews π§Άπ§΅π
It's only through such 'lawfully' consistent frames that participants are able to make sense of and interpret the unfolding journey on their own terms.
Without such an affordance it would seem that a group cannot meaningfully consent to any subsequent activity!
@DefenderOfBasic Thanks, looking forward to comments; the very end of the pitch jam link addresses the original question:
I would like to know if the paragraph on informed consent to decision-making through adaptive visual frames that are transparent and consistent addresses your concerns?
@DefenderOfBasic Good question,
I feel that this question is better explained visually as an initial workshop but since you ask...
Three articulations in order of comprehensiveness:
1) https://t.co/1XFPruGsDY
2) https://t.co/v2ICEwEWe7
3) https://t.co/ovtdiJOJ90
What do you think?
@prerat So it depends on how you construct your dimensions as well as the rules of the game right?
I can send you a link to an implementation based on the tetrahedron if you're interested.