猪多妖（MEME版）

2021加密小白

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@MURCATi 0x46c4ae97b5c4041bc0627ef020c75b467f9a8e61

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@zhuilong888 什么涨你喊啥

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

家人们，BSC 也太难玩了吧，感觉不错的项目块归零了 $TRUMAN
0xabffa443547b34ab6c3b3173d26e233900527777

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@lugeweb3 拿货成本低，其他钱包已经赚够了。

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

我的 SmartX 交易人格是梭哈仙人。

“每次梭哈都始于顿悟，终于轮回。”

6 道题，测出你的交易人格。加入等候名单，享最高 50% 手续费折扣，瓜分 10,000 USDT 奖励。

https://t.co/DgyNsGwxWd

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@BTCdayu 目前主流币这一波上涨节奏还在，BTC和ETH的高潮期往往是链上资产重新活跃的信号。这次meme行情跟进比较晚，没吃上肉，FOMO上手体验确实流畅，一键买资产挺方便，已经用码注册并关注了实盘。期待大宇继续分享，也祝抽奖顺利～

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@0xmasiwei robinhood:0x385f4f8ae47651ce5f58f5265395a669f8281e18 这是一个宏大的叙事

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@JakeGagain a meme coin robinhood:0x385f4f8ae47651ce5f58f5265395a669f8281e18

[Jeff @cfm_sol]

Someone just asked me whether the SEC’s approval of the Tokenized Stock rules is bad news for memetoon:native, so I want to share my personal view:I don’t think this is necessarily bad news.

0x385f4f8ae47651ce5f58f5265395a669f8281e18

The SEC’s new rules do address an important issue: when a third party tokenizes an NMS stock, it needs to notify the underlying stock issuer and give the issuer an opportunity to object. At the same time, Tokenized Stocks that qualify under the exemption need to provide the same rights and privileges as the traditional stock.

But there are two things that need to be separated here.

SEC approval ≠ MEME being invalidated

The SEC is mainly addressing the regulatory framework for Tokenized Stocks, not directly targeting MEME.

The current dispute between AMC and Robinhood is also centered around Robinhood’s tokenized AMC product and whether the issuer has the right to prevent a third party from creating financial products linked to its stock.

Robinhood’s position is that Stock Tokens are debt securities separately issued by Robinhood and backed 1:1 by the actual stocks, rather than AMC shares themselves being directly issued.

So I would break it down like this:SEC approval → Tokenized Stock infrastructure gets a clearer regulatory framework

AMC issuer-consent issue → Regulatory / legal issue surrounding a specific tokenized AMC product

For MEME, what really matters is whether the AMC × Robinhood × Tokenized Stocks dispute can continue generating Attention.

Because MEME’s core Narrative was never really “AMC stock itself.” It is:AMC → Tokenized Stock → Robinhood → Meme → Robinhood Chain

So I wouldn’t directly interpret the SEC’s new rules as a negative catalyst for MEME.

On the contrary, if the regulatory framework becomes clearer and Tokenized Stocks continue to develop, it could actually bring more Attention to the:

Meme + Tokenized Stock + Robinhood Chain

Narrative.

So for now, what I’m watching is not the SEC approval itself, but:

Will the AMC dispute continue to develop → Will Robinhood Stock Tokens continue to expand → Will the Tokenized Stock ecosystem on RH Chain continue to grow → Can MEME continue to carry this Narrative?

Chart: https://t.co/NZ4mPsizc4

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@jewjo_exe 0x293dc1c3b583654af425f65e7b3763370f981889 启动它

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@wallet 等他涨到1万美金

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@CEOAdam @dangallagher @vladtenev What’s the concern?

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

叙事升级

[Adam Aron @CEOAdam]

Hey there @dangallagher, in the past week you and @vladtenev CEO of Robinhood have made public comments defending your use of and “standing behind” your relatively new Stock Token concept.

I think this practice is abhorrent. It defeats the very ethos of share ownership. Public financial markets were created so that companies could raise capital, and so that investors could share in the wealth created as a result. Not to turn investing instead merely into some gamified business-oriented casino.

If by your own admission you can’t offer or sell Stock Tokens to “U.S. persons” why does your U.S. web site talk about them so much and so favorably?

Vlad: How can a U.S. brokerage firm be proud of creating an offshore Channel Island operation in far off Jersey specifically with the intent to operate outside U.S. securities laws? Is there potential confusion that Stock Token purchasers are getting less than all the rights accorded to real shareholders, and if so do you care? If those tokens are theoretically backed 1:1 by real shares, but hypothetically some of those underlying real shares are in turn lent out to short sellers, are the Tokens really backed 1:1 in fact?

Dan: I think U.S. securities laws have protected the public very well over the past century. You spent much of your career at the SEC. Deep down, in your heart of hearts, how can you really think a world without the precautions imposed by U.S. securities laws creates a better, safer environment for investors?

Choose whatever descriptors you think best make sense under the circumstances: Non-regulated, derivative, synthetic, sham, debt-backed securities trying to simulate actual real stock, or pick your own words if these don’t fit.

Stock Tokens may make you an innovator in your own eyes. In my eyes, they bring your firm dishonor.

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@BitcoinPulseX @grok @stoxacoin DONE

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@wyl2035 已关注

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@wyl2035 我愿意。中中中

[him @gajria]

Buyers help us accumulate more copper.
Sellers help us accumulate more copper.
Buyers help us burn more copper inu.
Sellers help us burn more copper inu.

Holders win: as their holdings get paid off + become more valuable as supply is burnt.

TL;DR: We can range forever and still make money.

Inunomics.

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@NIUB100 0x46c4ae97b5c4041bc0627ef020c75b467f9a8e61

[猪多妖（MEME版） @Jr8848189825]

@0xmagnolia 慧姐，帮忙看看🥹