THREAD: In Leaving Neverland, clips of 3 jurors are excerpted to imply they acquitted MJ only because of their dislike for the mom.
LN features Cook & Hultman, the two jurors who immediately planned a book (feat. Stacy Brown) and were told sensationalism and scandal sold more.
Art forgers usually go to jail. But not when Michael Jackson is the subject of your forgeries, and his estate is your financial target. Then, his estate will perpetuate your fraud for you, defend you when you get sued, and pull all stops to pervert the course of justice.
Palanker to Media: Janet was a good mom, childlike.
Palanker in 04 when she didn't know she was recorded:
"Janet's unbalanced. I think she's totally bipolar...the behavior from the children from the family was so over the top. I felt Gavin+Star were coached to ask for [gifts]."
That awkward moment when Frank's memoire "My Friend Michael" remains for sale—even appearing in Audible ads.
A book where he spends 336 pages talking about MJ's pure innocence, false accusations and relentless media gossip.
Including Frank's own voice narration of the prologue.
That awkward moment when Frank's memoire "My Friend Michael" remains for sale—even appearing in Audible ads.
A book where he spends 336 pages talking about MJ's pure innocence, false accusations and relentless media gossip.
Including Frank's own voice narration of the prologue.
Our own Charles Thomson has appeared on The View in Pakistan to discuss the Michael Jackson allegations, as Netflix releases its trial documentary series ‘The Verdict’.
https://t.co/VBp31FDY33
WADE & JAMES CASE STATUS (JUNE 2026)
Both sides have submitted an updated case status report and revised timeline estimates, prior to next week's hearing.
The mutually proposed trial date has now shifted out to February 14, 2028.
More than 5,400 days since Wade first filed. ⏰
Whenever a negative "documentary" about Michael comes out, the first few days are frustrating. Then we analyze the contradictions, lies and shifting stories that keep piling up. Reminding everyone just how easy it is to expose their falsehoods and tear down their house of cards.
On his website Vincent Amen claims MJ used this computer to "groom kids" in 2003. I'm not going to say anything more than: ask your ChatGPT when this computer was made. 🤣
Martin Bashir continues his lies for this special: "Michael volunteers during the conversation that he and Gavin sleep in the bed together."
The film cuts out the second half of the clip where MJ and Gavin both confirm that MJ slept on the floor.
The deception is surreal here.
Arvizo Timeline
2000: Nothing.
2001: Nothing.
2002: Distant from MJ for a year. Filmed LWMJ. Nothing.
2003: LWMJ airs. DCFS investigates. Media frenzy. Allred complains. Sneddon opens investigation & issues PR w/ tip lines.
👆 This is the moment MJ began committing "crimes."
MICHAEL JACKSON: THE VERDICT (June 13, 2005 - Unanimous Jury)
Count 1 - NOT GUILTY of Conspiracy.
Count 2 - NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child.
Count 3 - NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child.
Count 4 - NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child.
Diane Dimond has kept the same books for seven years she says are designed for pedophiles. This is her in 2019 and still showing them off
Apparently she doesn't mind having them in her home
you can't make this shit up 😂
The man who believed he could change the world through peace-driven, humanitarian acts, and did just that. He literally changed the world and we still see it nearly 17 years after his passing. Michael Jackson is immortal.
This is David Arvizo. He is the father of Michael Jackson accuser Gavin Arvizo. Did you know that David doesn’t believe his son’s allegations and actually agrees with the jury’s verdict? He was interviewed by a private investigator back in 2004 and he dropped all kinds of bombshells about his children and ex-wife. He told investigators that he didn’t believe the allegations that were being made against Michael Jackson because he knew his family very well and that what his kids were doing to MJ was what they were taught to do at a very young age.
David described his ex-wife Janet Arvizo as a very manipulative woman who was a scheming grifter/con artist and had raised their children to be the exact same way. She often targeted celebrities by using Gavin’s illness to gain their sympathy so that she could swindle money from them. According to David, she was a paranoid schizophrenic who had a habit of making false accusations of sexual abuse and that he himself was a victim of her lies and manipulations. She falsely accused him of molesting their daughter and falsely imprisoning the family—the exact same allegations she would later make against Michael Jackson.
According to David, Janet also encouraged their kids to shoplift from stores and that the allegations she made against JCpenny were totally false. According to David, the incident happened when Janet and the kids were stealing merchandise from the store and were stopped by security guards. She later filed a bogus lawsuit against them exaggerating what happened, claiming that the guards sexually assaulted her. JCpenny eventually settled for $150,000 to avoid bad publicity. A few days later, Janet had fraudulently applied for welfare benefits.
David also stated that Janet was physically abusive towards their children and would beat them if they didn’t follow with her schemes. Gavin had once accused his mother of abusing him but later recanted his claim. David Arvizo also claimed that Janet’s niece had told him that Janet had molested her when she was younger. When Gavin was ill with cancer, it was David who spent most of the time at the hospital with him. Apparently, hospital staff didn’t like Janet and would often complain about her.
David admitted that it was true that he did indeed have a history of domestic violence towards his wife, but made it clear that there were times when she would hit him too, and the list goes on. David totally believed in Michael Jackson’s innocence and even told investigators that he wanted to talk to him personally because he felt bad for him. David was on the defense witness list but was never called as a witness.