Καλέβιος

Kalevios Pontikos ☧ | Follower of Iēsous, son of the unknown Good Father. Citizen of His Kingdom. Student of early Christianity. Unashamed heretic.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

For those who are new here, let me be clear — my original followers can attest to this.

I started this account promoting Christian Orthodoxy. Then I discovered Michael Heiser’s Divine Council Worldview, which completely blew my mind. I was posting enthusiastically about the Watchers, Nephilim, and the “blurry” parts of the Bible that mainstream churches are now being forced to confront because of the UFO/UAP conversation.

Later, someone here shared Israel Anderson’s Two Gardens & a Snake, and for the first time I saw that YHWH was the one who lied in the Garden. That connected directly to Jesus saying the devil is a liar and murderer from the beginning. That discovery sent me much deeper down the rabbit hole.

As I began sharing what I was finding, I was quickly labelled a heretic and a Marcionite — even though I had never even heard of Marcion before. That accusation actually led me to research him, which then opened up serious study into early Christianity and the first New Testament.

My journey is fully visible on this account. If you go back through my older posts, you’ll see exactly how I got here.

So when people claim I just have a bias and simply “hate YHWH,” that’s not true. I didn’t start with that conclusion. I followed the evidence — studying how the texts developed, what came first, what was changed, and who changed them.

I’m not trying to pigeonhole anyone, and I’d appreciate the same courtesy. We’re all at different stages in our search for truth. May we all keep seeking it — because Jesus said He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and He told us to knock and seek, and the door will be opened.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@derekgilbert @EALTurner The Judaizers would certainly have you believe that with their layered redactions.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@CheekyMonkey_GR @meCal3b The moment you see that the Nachash was telling the truth, by the admission of YHWH himself, you finally let the text say what it says without dogma layered over it.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@CheekyMonkey_GR @meCal3b The moment you see that the Nachash was telling the truth, by the admission of YHWH himself, you finally let the text say what it says without dogma layered over it.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

https://t.co/Wq2FvAdDye

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

For those who are new here, let me be clear — my original followers can attest to this.

I started this account promoting Christian Orthodoxy. Then I discovered Michael Heiser’s Divine Council Worldview, which completely blew my mind. I was posting enthusiastically about the Watchers, Nephilim, and the “blurry” parts of the Bible that mainstream churches are now being forced to confront because of the UFO/UAP conversation.

Later, someone here shared Israel Anderson’s Two Gardens & a Snake, and for the first time I saw that YHWH was the one who lied in the Garden. That connected directly to Jesus saying the devil is a liar and murderer from the beginning. That discovery sent me much deeper down the rabbit hole.

As I began sharing what I was finding, I was quickly labelled a heretic and a Marcionite — even though I had never even heard of Marcion before. That accusation actually led me to research him, which then opened up serious study into early Christianity and the first New Testament.

My journey is fully visible on this account. If you go back through my older posts, you’ll see exactly how I got here.

So when people claim I just have a bias and simply “hate YHWH,” that’s not true. I didn’t start with that conclusion. I followed the evidence — studying how the texts developed, what came first, what was changed, and who changed them.

I’m not trying to pigeonhole anyone, and I’d appreciate the same courtesy. We’re all at different stages in our search for truth. May we all keep seeking it — because Jesus said He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and He told us to knock and seek, and the door will be opened.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@JohnRockwell43 @HauntedCosmos_ You haven’t answered the questions or shown any Hebrew text. “Satan” is just a title meaning adversary, not a name.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

The Old gods fell as Iēsous' kingdom rose—fair point. But pause and ask: How did 'the devil' become 'the god of this world' (2 Cor 4:4), making his offer of the kingdoms to Iēsous a genuine temptation? What would it look like if that entity craved to be Elyon, Most High? When did he appear as an angel of light? Who did the Hebrews know as ruler of this age? Name him. And show where this being lied from the beginning and shed innocent blood (John 8:44).

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

Micah 5:2 is not about Iēsous.

In context (8th cent. BCE Assyrian crisis), it promises a ruler from Bethlehem Ephrathah (David’s clan) who’ll shepherd Israel after military deliverance. The Hebrew “whose origin is from of old, from ancient days [ʿôlām]” refers to the antiquity of the Davidic line—not personal pre-existence.

ʿÔlām means a long but finite/unknown span of time (Biglino: “eternity doesn’t exist in Biblical Hebrew”), not timelessness. David was from Bethlehem; by Micah’s day the dynasty was already centuries old.

The Christian individual-Messiah-from-Bethlehem reading (Matthew 2:5-6) is eisegesis.

The earliest Gospel has no birth narrative—no Bethlehem, no genealogy. Iēsous simply descends into Capernaum revealing the Good God. The infancy stories were later redactions tying him to the Creator’s framework.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

YHWH allowed Job to be tormented as a pawn in a cruel wager: loss of all wealth, the violent death of his ten children, and crippling physical affliction.

Would Iēsous ever do this? Never.

He taught us plainly that evil cannot come from the Good. In fact, when addressed as “Good Teacher,” Iēsous Himself replied:

“Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.” (Luke 18:19 // Mark 10:18)

Iēsous explicitly disclaims the title “good” for Himself and reserves it for His Father alone — the wholly Good God. Further proof that YHWH (the one who creates evil and torments the righteous) is not that Father.

A good tree cannot bear bad fruit.

“No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit.” (Luke 6:43–44)

We are commanded to reject evil:

“Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good.” (Romans 12:9)

Yet the creator openly claims responsibility for evil:

“I form light and create darkness; I make well-being and create evil; I am YHWH, who does all these things.” (Isaiah 45:7)

“Does disaster come to a city, unless YHWH has done it?” (Amos 3:6)

Contrast this with the Father of Iēsous, who is kind even to the ungrateful and evil:

“Love your enemies, and do good… and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil.” (Luke 6:35)

The fruit of YHWH is the polar opposite of the fruit of Iēsous and His Father. By the standard Iēsous Himself gave us—we must judge by fruit—YHWH stands condemned as a very different being.

YHWH ≠ Iēsous.
YHWH ≠ the Good Father.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@PaulineHansonOz

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

BlackVue dashcams broadcast publicly 24/7 if you enable a certain feature... yikes.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@JeremyDBoreing Are you aware that this programme matches the pattern of the rebellious bene Elohim in Genesis 6, who created the hybrids known as the Nephilim?

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@JeremyDBoreing So you don't believe abductees when they claim there's an alien hybrid programme and that they're already walking among us?

Recommend you read Dr. David M. Jacobs's book on this.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

Iēsous taught us to pray directly to the Good Father: 'Father, hallowed be your name…' (TT 7:1–4 [Lk 11:2–4]).

He revealed exclusive knowledge: 'No one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom he chooses to reveal him' (TT 6:30 [Lk 10:22]). He defined compassion: 'Be compassionate, just as your Father is compassionate' (TT 3:36 [Lk 6:36]). He assured provision: 'Your Father knows what you need' (TT 8:24 [Lk 12:30]) and promised he would 'give the Holy Spirit to those who ask.'

Paul adds the cry: 'Abba, Father!' sent by the Spirit into our hearts (Gal 4:6 [TT 4:6]; Rom 8:15). That's not impersonal but a real adoptive relationship.

As for being a physical being, certainly not of this material world as the Father is 'above' it all, into whose hands Iēsous entrusted his spirit (TT 15:35 [Lk 23:46]). That being said we will never know on this side of His kingdom.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

Yahweh (the Elohim of Israel): “Make the heart of this people dull, and their ears heavy, and blind their eyes” (Isaiah 6:10).

Iēsous (revealing the Good Father): Heals the blind and opens their eyes (Evangelion, cf. Luke 18:35-43).

Yahweh blinds minds and hardens hearts; the alien Good Father through Iēsous grants sight and understanding. Judge the fruit.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be satisfied. (Evangelion, cf. Luke 6:21)

This beatitude in the New Testament promises the Good Father’s reversal: those hungering under Yahweh's scarcity will be filled in His kingdom. No Law-piety or works — pure grace satisfies.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@Austin_Mathew_ The god of the world, YHWH (Yahweh).

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

@BrysonGray You can thank the Judaizers for that.

[Καλέβιος @Kalevios]

Christians claim the crowd in John 8 accurately understood Iēsous claiming to be Yahweh at "Before Abraham was, I am." But the very same crowd, just verses earlier, sneered "You're a Samaritan and have a demon." The context doesn't prove they "got it" — it proves they had zero clue who Iēsous actually was.

Ironic that Christians treat a hostile, confused mob's reaction as rock-solid proof of high Christology.

The earliest restored canon (first NT) has no such identification anyway. Iēsous reveals the wholly Good God, distinct from Yahweh the creator of Law and judgment.

Context and fruit matter.

[Question The Trinity @QuestionTrinity]

Trinitarian: the crowd accurately understood “that Jesus was claiming to be YHWH” at the end of John 8

This same crowd a few verses earlier: “Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?”

Yea, they clearly understood Jesus…