Kate P

Neuro Physiotherapist. 2 kids.

[Kate P @Kate161P]

@bookingcom having a terrible time with your customer service. It’s been 13 days since I raised the issue and it’s either silence or a holding email. I won’t be a customer again.

[MrsA @abritishparent]

Rachel Reeves was warned by civil servants that a quarter of families set to be hit by the tax were below the average wealth level.

Evidence submitted to the High Court showed a Treasury briefing just days after the general election.

@EducationNotTax

https://t.co/IE6JtdrEPo

[Cookham Dean CC @CookhamDeanCC]

Exciting new project at CDCC!

Here's the link for the full details -
https://t.co/yhKydpR0VN

Any support is greatly appreciated 🙏

#Cricket #NewProject #Berkshire #CookhamDean #SupportLocal #SupportNeeded

🔗

[ENT - Education Not Taxation @EducationNotTax]

Almost 1,000 private primary pupils applying for state secondary places in just one county—Hertfordshire. 📈And yet Labour claims only 3,000 kids will be displaced nationwide in Year 1 of #SchoolFeeVAT? 🤔
🔗https://t.co/nys5OkbiNV
Time for a rethink, #FindABetterWay @RachelReevesMP @bphillipsonMP.

#LabourFail #EducationNotTax @TiceRichard @dshensmith @anthonyboutall

[Molly Kingsley @lensiseethrough]

Conducting trials on children without voluntary informed consent is a breach of UK legislation, international medical ethics, and the Nuremberg Code. A £44,000 'admin fee' for a company with market capitalisation of USD 11.75 billion is an insult to the public these rules are failing to protect.

The UK's 'self-regulatory' regime for the pharma industry is a sham. Rules which incur no meaningful penalty for breach provide zero disincentive to discourage repeat, serious transgressions and can barely even be called 'rules'.

UsForThem represented the complainant at this hearing. It's the fourth case in as many months in which @moderna_tx has been found guilty of the most serious violation under the UK regulatory regime. There's more coming down the line, too.

https://t.co/uqsAAcztQF

[Kate P @Kate161P]

@EducationNotTax I have asked @JoshReynoldsSL6 if he is attending this debate on behalf of his constituents in RBWM.

[Molly Kingsley @lensiseethrough]

Deeply problematic report out today–– the 'Commission on Countering Online Conspiracies in Schools'. "Young people are more likely to trust social media influencers than the government" says the Times, in an article broadly representative of mainstream coverage of the report. Yet, if we've learned anything over the last five years, it's that Government is often the most profligate purveyor of misinformation of them all.

To see just how nebulous and problematic this whole area is, take a look at the other photo I've included here; which is from the report itself and shows examples of the so-called 'conspiracy theories' the report liberally brands as 'misinformation' (the report goes further and indicates some of these may also constitute a safeguarding matter).

Examples include:

“[my grandmother thinks] Covid was China’s way of dominating us"

"I got family [sic] who would believe the new Covid vaccine kills people”

"secretive cabals run the world’s institutions"

Now, whilst we can debate whether or not these are 'conspiracy' theories' until we're blue in the face, what is FACT is that each contain elements of truth: China is a major funder and controller of the WHO, an organisation which absolutely attempted, and is still attempting, to dominate global public health policy. The Covid vaccines did kill people. And secretive cabals do, sometimes, run the world's institutions. Many will point to the murky WEF and the opaque, corporate-tainted WHO as evidence of the latter point, but in fact there are plenty of examples closer to home: what about the four men who between 2020 and 2022 took it upon themselves to run UK Government by WhatsApp, declining to take minutes of meetings and bypassing all accepted forms of established government and governance?

It may be that none of these examples is clear-cut, but the answer can't be to censor discussion of them. Denouncing issues which have a nexus in truth as 'conspiracies', to be placed out of the bounds of acceptable classroom chit-chat and investigation, will seed unnecessary division in schools and will fuel further distrust of authority, including of the very teachers this report aims to help.

https://t.co/qF0FUtpzm4

[Kate P @Kate161P]

@JoshReynoldsSL6 @EducationNotTax

[Caroline Farrow @CF_Farrow]

Another school closing due to the tax on education.

160 girls scrambling for state places and a group of teachers and support staff out of jobs.

Labour's decimation of education continues.

https://t.co/3YIxQFKyHa

[UsForThemUK 🌟 @UsforThemUK]

Powerful article from @dr_musgrave. Not mentioned in this article is that in May 2023, following his retirement from Government in March 2022, Van-Tam joined @moderna_tx as a senior medical consultant.

Yet when Hugo Keith KC, counsel to the Inquiry, gave a lengthy read-out of all of Van-Tam's professional qualifications and experience at the start of his evidence session for this vaccines module, for some reason there was no mention of Van-Tam's current role at Moderna. An omission which is all the more stark given the significant discussion in that session of Moderna's mRNA partnership with the UK Government.

[Olly @oIIyjm]

Computing, physics, MFL, Latin and now maths...

Far from pursuing higher standards, this government's plans for education are rooted in the ambition to level-down 📉
https://t.co/IOGH8cyCq6

[Kate P @Kate161P]

@TonyHinton2016 @CMO_England @gmcuk The pressure on HCP’s was immense. “No jab or no job”

[Kate P @Kate161P]

@TonyHinton2016 @CMO_England @gmcuk What he actually said at the time was this, and the pressure on HCP’s was unrelating, for over 2 years.
https://t.co/DrzDXdwvW0

[Kate P @Kate161P]

He said this: https://t.co/DrzDXdwvW0

[Kate P @Kate161P]

He did not say this at the time. Chris Whitty was 'sceptical' about mandatory Covid jabs for healthcare workers https://t.co/z5SWfUC2aR

[UsForThemUK 🌟 @UsforThemUK]

MP @RupertLowe10 made an urgent call on Thursday for Parliament to protect public health with reform of the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (@MHRAgovuk) in the wake of the 'wicked' Covid response:

"How can [the MHRA] possibly be trusted to regulate properly when they are largely funded by the companies they are tasked to regulate?"

"How could MHRA CEO June Raine say she had transformed the MHRA from a watchdog to an enabler of the pharmaceutical industry?"

"...Vaccinating almost the entire population, including disgracefully young children...was a hideous dereliction of duty from the MHRA."

[Katharine Birbalsingh @Miss_Snuffy]

My open letter to the Education Secretary ⁦@bphillipsonMP⁩

Many teachers and school leaders share my concerns with regard to her decisions but are scared to say.

If you can find it in you, please RT.

My letter is also here: https://t.co/phAiybAov5

[Molly Kingsley @lensiseethrough]

Alongside recognising that, for some, Covid vaccines went "horribly wrong", is @covidinquiryuk going to consider the global significance of the disclosures made by Mark Zuckerberg in his interview with @joerogan?

Zuckerberg said that the Biden administration "said anything that says vaccines might have side effects you basically need to take down…they pushed us super hard to take down things that were true". In so doing Zuckerberg's view is that the US administration acted dishonestly and illegally. Zuckerberg also explains that this form of State censorship was not limited to the US.

So will the Inquiry also call @Dominic2306 to explain his comment that there is "hidden data on covid vaccines" in the UK and that the "old regime lied and destroyed trust"?

The legal landscape appears increasingly treacherous for those who took it upon themselves knowingly to mis-state the risks and benefits of Covid vaccines, and then to coerce many, including children, to be vaccinated.

https://t.co/60ytUR4pcs

[UsForThemUK 🌟 @UsforThemUK]

The ubiquity of conflicts of interest across the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries is plain to see when the Royal College of GPs doesn't even attempt to deny that it had a conflict, or that it failed to declare it.

ABPI figures in fact indicate that between 2020 and 2023 the RCGP received more than £500k from Pfizer.

Having failed to disclose that it had a financial relationship with Pfizer, @rcgp gave unequivocal, supposedly independent, advice and encouragement for the CMOs to deploy Pfizer's product to children across the UK:

"The Royal College of General Practitioners have consulted widely across GPs, and there is a strong consensus in favour of vaccinating 12-15s".

(The only vaccine on offer to 12-15s at that time, was Pfizer's.)

Whatever these organisations may say about sponsorship policies, independence, percentages of income, contractual agreements... when someone gives you half a million pounds your objectivity and independence is impaired.

https://t.co/rYmHpf3gvH

[Allison Pearson @AllisonPearson]

This stinks to high heaven.
The Royal College of GPs, which outrageously recommended Covid jabs for children, forgot to mention it had accepted money from Pfizer.
Is the Covid Inquiry going to address this?
Bravo @UsforThemUK for not letting people off the hook!