Constitutional Key

Read in the Law in the Style of Lincoln: Hyperfocused with Constitutional Construction.

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/BIVall92Wa

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/A0unrkSXGf

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/8rpR5armVo

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

Claim
Justice will not become a mere extension of politics through organized jury nullification, because the Constitution, under its incident rules of construction demanding jubens honesta (commanding what is honest) and prohibiting the contrary, preserves appellate review of a verdict produced by dishonesty. Common-law practice prior to the Constitution permitted inquiry into a false or dishonest verdict by writ of attaint; the American tradition (as in Massachusetts) substituted a non-draconian remedy that vacated the first result for further process. Neither left a politically instructed nullification unreviewable. An honest construction of the jury-trial guarantees—giving effect to every word, tracking contemporaneous usage, remaining manifest rather than concealed, and forbidding private advantage at another’s injury—therefore treats systematic instructions to hide bias and disregard evidence and law as a ground for appeal, not as the final word.

Conclusion
Organized campaigns that train citizens to conceal an agenda and nullify regardless of the facts and the law contradict the Constitution’s stated purpose of securing the Blessings of Liberty under law. Such concealment is dishonest relative to the juror’s oath and the operative meaning of the jury’s role. Appellate courts may therefore hear a challenge grounded in that dishonesty—whether framed as a motion for new trial, as error in the process, or as a claim that the verdict was produced by a method the text forbids—without converting justice into politics. The historical American preference for a further hearing before another jury need only be noted lightly; the decisive point is that the first verdict remains subject to review for dishonesty rather than standing as an unappealable political act.

Summary
The warning that nullification training turns justice into an extension of politics is answered by the requirement that the law must command what is honest and by the surviving appeal that must be allowed if dishonesty exists. Common law allowed attaint of a false verdict; American practice allowed the first result to be vacated for further process. Both mechanisms reject the idea that a concealed political instruction or dishonesty is the last word. Under rules derived from the Preamble—commanding what is honest, remaining possible and manifest, giving every word effect, and forbidding private benefit at another’s injury—a reviewing court must at least entertain the claim. Justice therefore stays an application of law rather than politics, because dishonesty in the production of a verdict remains appealable.

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/BIVall92Wa

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@SRCHicks no rider policy available?

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@marklevinshow Woke Left and Woke right, both are in truth dogmatic.

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@OrinKerr Where Congress creates a law that puts forth when Tariffs can be implemented, who enforces the law?

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@not_our_guy _____ in ______ clothing....

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@theRhyenStaley @ConceptualJames Solution:

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/A0unrkSXGf

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@OrinKerr Where Congress creates a law that puts forth when Tariffs can be implemented, who enforces the law?

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@jacklgoldsmith In my opinion, Sovereign Jurists are arguing over whose mind has greater jurisdiction.

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@CynicalPublius @ConceptualJames In response to such claims, the Construction of law thru objective truth:

https://t.co/GSbbxZt2DF

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/BIVall92Wa

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

Critical Theory—social construct—illusion: Critical Theory is the continuation of the Gnostic claim that the demiurge (oppressors) establishes the norms (illusions) by which the oppressed are made prisoners in the world.

Understand the following to know the gnostic, whose fruit is the evolution of the snake, that is like the snake, that to eat the fruit is not wrong for Man (society,) for God had no right to exclude Adam and Eve, or Man (society,) from such property, but to exclude is an illusion of right, and, by the gnostic and snake, not right and a hinderwnce of Man (society.)

The social construct (illusion) is the means of the Demiurge and Archons to imprisoned the oppressed (gnostic) in the world. To understand the seven spheres of the Demiurge and Archons, is to understand what the (adept) will call social construct (illusion), and is to understand the game plan of what the Gnostic puts forth is the prison (norm), as well as allows for abstraction of what the Gnostic will seize as a means of breaking the social construct (illusion), including those unable to recieve a higher consciousness (the Hylic.)

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@NewDiscourses @ConceptualJames https://t.co/LmrlHrASet

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/vGbiSjA1PF

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@ConceptualJames Is it you dividing the right, or their claims and actions to not support the Constitution that divides them from those that support the Constitution?

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/WJUGiqBOrr

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/ZKznMIcq7i

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

https://t.co/EGgmVokL3m

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@SRCHicks It was Churchill's parrot.

[Constitutional Key @Key2Const_]

@ConceptualJames @docMJP Arrogance seems to be in dogmatic.

Dogmatic: 2. Positive; magisterial; asserting or disposed to assert with authority or with overbearing and "arrogance;" applied to persons; as a dogmatic schoolman or philosopher