The question came up on another post "Do I support Bibi or Vance"?
My answer unequivocally is Bibi and not just because Vance is an antisemite. Vance has never had my support. Labeling President Trump America's Hitler in 2016 did it for me. That's not idle prattle. Thats not sarcasm. That's not policy dispute. That's not a slip of the tongue. He meant it. I dug deeper. Vance and Silicon Valley Billionaire Peter Thiel have had a weird alliance since their days at Yale. Home of Secret Societies. Thiel bought Vance's Senate seat for $15 million. Vance claims he owes Thiel nothing on another YouTube video, which is hilarious. The borrower is always servant to the lender. Proverbs 22:7. Vance owes Thiel big-time and Thiel will collect. A vote for Vance is a vote for Peter Thiel. A vote for Vance is a vote for America's Hitler.
Watch: JD Vance. Manufactured Politician:
Questions for @RealCandaceO
Question 1
You have said that you were kicked out of your home at age 14 and lived with a boyfriend for six months, describing yourself as “one of those kids.” How did those early experiences shape your understanding of relationships, authority, and personal boundaries?
Question 2
Years later, in your debate with 20 feminists and on the podcast Whatever, you often gave the impression that you were not one of those kids. Maybe I am wrong, Candace, so can you tell us whether you ever talked about your past in those debates, or explained how those early experiences shaped the beliefs you now promote for women?
Question 3
You have said that from about ages 8 to 18, you read only fiction books, and that you began reading nonfiction only after you became interested in politics. How did spending almost a decade reading only fiction affect how you understand the world’s complexity and complicated issues in general?
Question 4
In 2007, you sued the Stamford Board of Education after reporting racist death-threat voicemails. In 2024, you publicly stated that you were again receiving death threats, but this time from the French government. Given that, according to you, your parents kicked you out of your home at age 14, that you later received death threats from students connected to the Stamford Board of Education, and that you now say you are receiving death threats from the French government, how do you understand this pattern of death-threat claims appearing at major phases of your life?
Question 5
In 2015, when you started the project called Degree180, you published articles criticizing conservative Republicans and the Tea Party movement, and mocking Donald Trump, including comments about his penis size. During that same period, you also wrote articles stating that cheating and having affairs could be romantic, and another article suggesting that it could be smart for a woman to marry a gay man. Even if you identified at that time as a Democrat or a liberal, these views are not commonly held within those groups. What values were guiding those arguments at that time?
Question 6
In 2016, you launched https://t.co/AcJCrp2EJP, a project that involved publicly identifying individuals accused of online harassment. After the project was suspended, you were later doxxed. After you were doxxed, you blamed the left. Is that true, and did that experience contribute to your shift toward conservatism?
Question 7
You have said that you used Charlie Kirk’s credit card to buy airline tickets to the UK without asking his permission. What was the nature of your professional or personal relationship with him that made you feel comfortable enough to do that?
Question 8
In December 2018, during that UK trip, you met George Farmer. Shortly afterward, in May 2019, you made comments at a Turning Point UK event stating that nationalism itself was not problematic, and that Hitler’s issue was his global ambitions rather than nationalism confined to Germany. How do you reflect on the timing and substance of those remarks today?
Question 9
After 2019, TPUSA distanced itself from you and you were no longer on the payroll, even though you later spoke at events such as the Michigan event in 2024. How did that distancing affect how you viewed TPUSA from that point forward?
Question 10
Is it possible for you, and for your followers, to consider that Erika Kirk is not a perfect human being, like all of us, and that Turning Point USA is not a flawless organization, like any organization, but that your conclusion that they betrayed Charlie could be wrong, especially if that conclusion was influenced by a dream?
Cc:@paramounttactcl@TheMilkBarTV@NatlyDenise_@RealAlexJones@Timcast@tylerbowyer@AndrewKolvet@FBI@realDonaldTrump@DrPhil@jordanbpeterson@elonmusk@patrickbetdavid@sostalksmoney
https://t.co/hxyj22qpEE
Candace Owens is once again playing her favorite game of gaslighting the entire internet, claiming that she “never said Erika Kirk killed Charlie” as if her months-long “Bride of Charlie” conspiracy circus, the nonstop podcast episodes demanding Erika be dragged into a police station for questioning, the leaked-audio hit jobs painting the grieving widow as suspiciously upbeat, and the endless insinuations about betrayal by “people close to him,” MK-Ultra ties, Israeli plots, and black-widow motives were all just innocent “questions” from a neutral journalist.
Spare us the fake amnesia, @RealCandaceO. You built an entire grift empire around implying Erika orchestrated or covered up her husband’s public execution, raked in the views and merch sales doing it, then had the audacity to clutch your pearls when Erika finally called you out for straight-up claiming she murdered her husband. You didn’t “just ask questions”, you poisoned the well, profited off a widow’s pain, and now you’re pretending your hands are clean? That’s not investigative journalism; that’s cowardice wrapped in a podcast mic. Own your conspiracy trash or shut up.
.@piersmorgan Mark Levin reminds me of an angry woman who comes into couples therapy with her husband. The husband sits there calm, polite, and composed, while the woman appears frustrated, emotional, and angry. As the session unfolds, the husband looks at me and says, “See who the crazy person is?”
But anyone who has done enough couples therapy knows that appearances can be deceiving. The person expressing the most anger is not always the one causing the dysfunction. Sometimes the anger is a reaction to years of frustration, dismissal, manipulation, or feeling betrayed.
In this analogy, @marklevinshow is the angry woman. He may come across as furious, emotional, or over the top, but that does not necessarily make him the irrational one.
In the same way, people like Jack Posobiec or Alex Bruesewitz often appear calm, polished, and composed.
Yet being calm and composed does not automatically mean someone is right, just as being angry does not automatically mean someone is wrong.
By the way, @piersmorgan, you think @cenkuygur is passionately angry, huh? Rewatch this clip from your show 👇 . As a therapist and behavioral analyst, I can tell you that it’s rare for someone to be genuinely that angry and then laugh a second later.
One day, I think people will better understand where Mark Levin’s anger comes from, just as many families eventually come to understand that the angry woman in the marriage was not the crazy one after all.
🚨 HEY!!! HAVE Y'ALL MET MY FRIENDS!? I have the BEST mutuals of any account on X!! I'd love to recognize the following accounts, as today's MEGA MAGA MUTUALS!!!
@JacabiteRebel@JohnHenry65331@RayhensonRE@ShannonigansX
These friends always support God, the Constitution, Trump, and the American way! ❣️👊🇺🇸
🚨 REP. Harriet Hageman just NAILED IT.
“Cisgender is a MADE-UP word. It means NOTHING. Do NOT call me cisgender. I am a woman.”
“All you need to determine s*x is a cheek swab. XX or XY. Boy or girl. IT’S THAT SIMPLE.”
.@SenJohnKennedy,
Is it true that you’re publicly supporting the SAVE America Act,
but then privately attacking those Senators that are actually pushing for the SAVE America Act?
It looks like you’re up for re-election in 2028.
Yet another example of why freedom of speech doesn't exist in France for those who protest against the migrant invasion.
My full support goes to @Frontieresmedia
A warning from @dbongino people should take very seriously. We are dealing with people who have lost the plot and who would have no problem seriously hurting anyone that stands in their way. Just look at their rhetoric and the lengths they go to. And they are not just on the left.