?! Why are you not knowing !?
All my social media posts are me, expressing my opinion!
Take offense or don't: I follow who I want, I determine who follows me.
When Michigan voters are by volume, crying out for help to safeguard our elections and the processes that guide it, ....it tells me that it's going to take a LOT MORE than just a few federal poll watchers to make it happen.
@dojphofficial ..Where are you? Michigan needs you NOW
Balls in your court now, @HarmeetKDhillon
Will you send investigators to Hastings Charter Township to investigate these claims and ensure clean voter rolls?
Or will "monitors" somehow catch by simply watching elections like they have for decades?
Pray for Clint Curtis in Shasta County, California.
He is one of the few honest election supervisors in the county. It appears his hand count team found fake and fraudulent ballots submitted in the last election.
There still appears to be a level of infiltration from election staff holdovers, bypassing security protocols, in an attempt to be around the ballots and machines when no else is present.
He has notified and cooperated with the FBI, but expressed a need for the DOJ/FBI to secure what amounts to a crime scene before the risk of foul play continues.
@realDonaldTrump@HarmeetKDhillon
https://t.co/1WDxH3bsvR
The new mail-in ballot procedure isn’t something to be afraid of. It works like this:
1. The state provides a list of the ballots they intend to mail out.
2. USPS assigns a unique barcode to each.
3. When the ballot is mailed out, this barcode is scanned to ensure uniqueness and that it matches. If there is no match or it’s a duplicate, it is not delivered.
4. When the voter mails the ballot back, the USPS scans it again and checks to make sure it matches what went out and isn’t a duplicate. Any ballots that don’t match won’t be delivered.
5. This is all done on the exterior envelope. The USPS isn’t determining eligibility or deciding who gets a ballot. They can’t see the actual votes. They are essentially just ensuring there are no duplicates, that the number mailed in isn’t greater than the number mailed out, and that the person mailing one in was the same person who received them.
This is a common sense solution and is completely reasonable.
Why would anyone oppose it unless their intention is to cheat?
If ANYONE knows of a clerk afraid to come forward as in this case, please show them this video clip to expose @JocelynBenson with her corruption
We are going to go all the way to ensure Michigan voters are not saddled with a fraud for Governor, by continuing to air these videos
Will someone from the WH (anyone of substance such as the @POTUS or @SusieWiles will do) confirm that U.S Senator Mitch McConnell is alive!
What will it take?
Asking for millions of Americans.
Thank you so much for your research.
Our republic depends on
We the People selecting our leaders.
Hopefully we move toward removing this manipulative voting system. And very soon
We will need people like you to help us set up a new system, one that is safe and insecure for the American people.
The DOJ contacted me about one of my other findings, forged signatures in the rolls, but weren't interested in the algorithms. I don't think they were interested in the signatures either, or they would have asked for the evidence. Instead, they asked for the rolls I had, and that was it.
I'm pretty sure an algorithm has been in Shelby County TN voter lists too (Memphis). I got several iterations of those by retrieving from a hard drive turned over in litigation. I puzzled over what started to look like a large pattern but couldn't pin it down. After reading your work, I am tempted to go find the old backup drive I put them on to try again.
In April of 2022, I discovered traces of an algorithm in New York's voter rolls.
The algorithm was deterministic. That means it is reversible and that it can be used to hide information in plain sight. That capability, when used, is called "steganography" (not to be confused with "stenography").
Steganography is a type of information hiding, similar to encryption, that is useful to people who know the key, and useless to anyone else. It is similar to a deck of marked cards. In the hands of players who are unaware the decks are marked, there is no harm. In the hands of a person who understands the markings, they impart knowledge that can be used to significantly increase the chances of winning.
I have found similar algorithms in multiple states.
Here is a basic fact about information security: If any trace of an algorithm like this is found: hidden, deterministic, capable of storing data, the default reaction is to assume it is malacious and to investigate it immediately.
Only if an investigation comes up with the certain cause of the algorithm, and certain knowledge it was designed for a benign purpose, is the assumption of maliciousness lifted. Until then, it is considered one of the most dangerous types of data manipulation that can be found in any database, especially when attached to identification numbers, as is the case in every state I found them in.
I know for a fact that high level people in the Trump administration are aware of my research on this. If they are performing the normal cybersecurity investigation that would be conducted in any regulated or unregulated business that found such artifacts, they would have started investigations of the algorithms.
The NY findings have been confirmed by other researchers I know, who independently obtained their own copies of New York's voter rolls directly from the BOE.
I have published 6 peer-reviewed papers on this research, and presented at a cyber warfare conference in Virginia last year on the topic.
No one wants to discuss this. Possibly because:
1. Anyone who checks the rolls, retrieved independently from the state involved, will see the algorithms are real.
2. The people who should be checking the rolls know what they will find, and don't want to officially find it.
For all the talk of machines and hand counting, I remain very interested in the near blackout on information about these algorithms. If they are benign, I'd like to see someone prove it. I spent five years of my life studying them. I would much rather have spent my time some other way. If that was a waste of time, I'd like to know now, before I waste any more.
However, I've said it before, and no one has yet come forward with an explanation, let alone a credible one. There have been a couple of reflexive defenses of voter rolls, but none engaged with the data, making them worthless.
For those of you who like math puzzles, this is what one of them looks like. Note: I provide the answer key.
64,000 mail-in ballots were xeroxed in the back of a conference room during the Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2020 election by Claire Woodall-Vogg, which were all for Joe Biden.
She was then caught on camera at 3:00 am on Nov. 4th uploading the fraudulent tabulated votes on flash drives without any chain-of-custody or election observers to steal Wisconsin for Joe Biden in the 2020 election.
An email from Ryan Chew at "The Election Group," emailed Claire Woodall-Vogg stating:
"Damn, Claire, you have a flair for drama, delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am..."
She was caught and fired. How many other election workers in other states committed fraud just like this that got away with it? The 2020 election was stolen.
The State Board of Canvassers has just decided to leave the initiative requiring proof of citizenship off the ballot in November. Over 700,000 signatures were submitted. The Board reviewed 1000 signatures to make their decision.
I’m certain it will be challenged in court but that misses the point. It’s an insult to the people of Michigan that 1000 signatures can determine the outcome. The initiative only needs 446,000 valid signatures to be placed on the ballot. I’m sorry but I do not believe that over 254,000 signatures were bad.
The process is mucked up, the partisanship being applied to the rules of our republic cannot be selectively applied.
Our state and country are in a very dangerous spot.
What do you think?
@downi75 It is confusing. Why not fight for the Great State of Michigan, the people of Detroit, other all the other Michigan cities, and for the country?