Andreas Kleivset

Author of The Tech-Safe Parent 📖 | Software Engineer & Dad. Helping adult children protect aging parents from scams & tech chaos. 👇

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

They protected you, taught you, and kept you safe. Now, as the digital world gets wilder, it's your turn. Our aging parents face unprecedented online threats. This isn't just about tech; it's about safeguarding their peace, dignity, and savings. #TechSafeParent #FamilyProtection

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@RoccoSperanza Does this happen at superchargers as well?

[Steven Peeters @aikisteve]

Gradually coming everywhere. Also Europe in time. Needs separate approval from RDW though, but process will be much shorter this time

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@TexasTSLA Only for EA, same as in America. They point to it rolling wider following further validation, which appears to be the case for you guys as well. 👍

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@businessboy_gh @CFantasyScout @WorldCup26HQ By the same standard, a foul was given against Romero/Arg, even if he received no card, and a correct foul was given against Egypt, leading to the cancelation of their goal.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@businessboy_gh @CFantasyScout @WorldCup26HQ The standard of this WC has no card in this situation. If you were to ask in CL, I could definitely see this being yellow carded.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@CFantasyScout @WorldCup26HQ Would have been red if he jumped in with his studs, yet, he didn't.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@ThaEuropeanLad He was standing on his foot. How is that soft?!

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@BerlinSoul @joonlee https://t.co/xYxjAO3hvU

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@RioMoussallem In the first situation Egypt won the ball as a direct result of illegal play, while in the later one the ball was won legally and Salahs motion continued into the defender after the ball was in contested play. This is why the situations get treated differently.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@RioMoussallem In the first situation Egypt won the ball as a direct result of illegal play, while in the later one the ball was won legally and Salahs motion continued into the defender after the ball was in contested play. This is why the situations get treated differently.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@terryflewers He lost possession of the ball as a result of a tackle, then collided with the defender's feet. With VAR, this has never been ruled a penalty when the attacker loses possession like that.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@DaleJohnsonBBC "slight step". This has been a free kick for the entire world cup.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@LudwigAhgren Honest.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@WadePlem This is common in football.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@daltonbrewer Validation.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@MissJilianne Funny how you purposely avoid that Tesla is the only one promising & delivering FSD at this scale.

They validate real-world data first, like they always do.

The rest just talk.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

@JonBbC_TechGeek Reaction time tests. I want to see if it's any more responsive at all, what better way than through testing.

[Devin Olsen @DevinOlsenn]

HW3 has been on V12 for 501 days.

That's a long time, and anyone using it knows what to expect. It may not be perfect, but it is STABLE.

V14 lite seems to be a significant update, and with that there may be some issues (I have already seen a few videos of 'bugs' with v14 lite).

Why after all this time is there a sudden urgency? Rushing this update makes no sense at all.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

De solgte det en gang i tiden som FSD, nå er det FSD (Supervised).

Hva du trenger blir løst i fremtiden, det som er her nå (der det er tilgjengelig), gir en mye mer avslappet og behagelig kjøreopplevelse. (Om du trenger andre kilder enn meg på dette, bare spør noen som har sittet på med de nyere versjonene av FSD (supervised).)

Elon har ikke gitt opp FSD, men har annerkjent at eldre biler vil trenge ombygging for å oppnå dette. Så gjenstår det jo å se da om nyere biler også må bygges om for å oppnå dette løfte, eller om ingeniørene hos Tesla kan trylle nok en gang.

[Andreas Kleivset @KleivZOP]

WHAT NORWAY'S ROAD AUTHORITY JUST REVEALED ABOUT THE REAL BATTLE FOR FSD IN EUROPE

​Something rare happened in European regulatory discourse this week. After I sent a formal technical inquiry to Statens vegvesen (SVV), Norway's Road Authority, challenging their public FSD position on specific methodological grounds, chief engineer Stein-Helge Mundal responded with a detailed line-by-line breakdown. It reveals exactly what Tesla is fighting for.

THE REGULATORY BASELINE MOST PEOPLE HAVE WRONG:

​Most public commentary frames the approval question as: "Is FSD safer than a human driver?" That is the wrong question under UN Regulation 171.
Mundal is explicit: because the human driver remains legally responsible and must intervene at all times, comparing the AI to a human is irrelevant. The actual regulatory test RDW applied is:
Is driving with the system active at least as safe as driving with it deactivated?
System-on vs. system-off, same car, same driver. The European bar for FSD Supervised isn't "superhuman" — it's incrementally safer than not having the feature active.

THE SENTENCE THAT DEFINES EVERYTHING:

​Buried in Mundal's response is a statement that cuts straight through the current TCMV standoff:
"If there had been no exemptions, there would be no exemption process in the EU, and the system could have been approved and put into use months ago, limited to motorways."
The core FSD Supervised system passes standard R171 requirements on motorways. The entire European dispute, the Sweden letter, the Nordic friction, the months of deliberations, is exclusively about three operational exemptions RDW granted beyond the basic scope.

THE BATTLE FOR THE PRODUCT'S SOUL:

​Those three exemptions are not peripheral features. They are the product itself:
• Hands-free beyond motorways: FSD is built for real urban and rural environments. A motorway-only restriction delivers Enhanced Autopilot, not FSD.
• Speed offset from posted limits: Real traffic flows dynamically. Locking a car rigidly to a sign creates dangerous speed differentials. The offset allows the system to blend naturally into actual traffic.
• Lateral dynamics in curves and roundabouts: Complex roundabouts and sharp bends are the European norm. Restricting this behavior leaves you with a system that only works on the easiest roads.
Tesla isn't being stubborn in Brussels, they are protecting the product's soul. The exemptions are the product.

THE INSTITUTIONAL REALITY:

​Mundal's response clarifies exactly where national authorities stand:
• SVV conducts no independent testing. That role belongs entirely to RDW.
• SVV's review focuses exclusively on the exemptions, not re-litigating the base approval.
• SVV has no diverging empirical data to challenge RDW's safety file.
• On a Norwegian EØS objection: zero assessment prepared, no framework exists.
• ETSC is a policy opinion voice, no formal regulatory weight against RDW's technical file.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE EUROPEAN TIMELINE:

​The path to true FSD Supervised runs through the TCMV. October 2026 qualified majority vote is the focal point. A positive outcome means EEA states follow by obligation and national authorities implement accordingly.
Tesla is holding the line in Brussels because that is the only place the line actually matters.

​Full disclosure: I am a Tesla owner with a prepaid FSD package on a 2021 Model 3 LR in Norway, actively tracking this case. Mundal's response was to a formal written inquiry submitted to SVV on July 2, 2026, referencing case 26/107835-1.
​#Tesla #FSD