@photoeinstein12@knowbothsids@Penny_BiKhim@KnowBothSides If ROC is still a country, it means now there are 2 Chinas as the original one China split in 1949. If China can split into 2, the 2 can also merge back into 1. So like you said, what UN says or whatever your "legality" are all meaningless cuz PRC is able to merge the 2 back to 1
@borntosneed@BardonRichard@AngelicaOung They're communists 2.0. No one realizes that what the Soviets and Mao did was the 1st experiments of the then-new theory of communism.
@evadne@knowbothsids @Elaina43114880 No one realizes what the Soviets and Mao did was the 1st experiments of the then-new theory of communism. It was a learning process. They failed. China succeeded. Now capitalists can't be in CN's politburo or lobby the govt, unlike democracies controlled by capitalist oligarchy
@Penny_BiKhim@photoeinstein12@knowbothsids@KnowBothSides In reality, if China can split, it can also merge. So whatever your legality is meaningless cuz no one can stop the merge. It's a waste of time to argue if it's legal or not. You say illegal, PRC says legal, no one can stop the merge, so?
@JosephSomsel@GlennLuk If "CCP coercion" were true, why are there still so many Chinese who stayed in the US? Do you know how many top engineers in top US AI labs are from China?
@thiagoTF@AngelicaOung Nah, it's not abt "customer service". You didn't read the story. For example, one thing it mentions is noise level right below Germany's regulation threshold
https://t.co/Ocgmh8Xc8U
@kyleichan@Changxche this guys sounds like he has never tried the recent GLM & Kimi models. I don't really see why he is qualified to be interviewed.
@AngelicaOung It says "China’s autocrats hope this will sharpen their country’s technological edge while boosting competition and benefiting consumers." 5 yrs later, who can say that it didn't turn out to be a magic touch?