@FUDdaily I saw no point in them leaving the ECHR if they were going to continue with entrusting asylum decisions to the crooked Judges but this policy idea is genuinely smart.
Specifically for asylum cases it overrides judicial authority and brings it back under the control of ministers.
Some progress at last.
The unconcealed bias of these UK Immigration Judges has led to a loss of countless innocent lives.
They are not only activists, they are enemies of the nation and (some would argue) knowingly complicit in the grisly violence committed against our people.
@WasAcop Once they get in at the OS level it's only a matter of time before Apple and Google cave to their demands for real-time storage scanning and backdoor access to snoop on private messages.
@owenjonesjourno I thought Palestine Action was a peaceful protest group but the more I learn the more I gather that's not entirely true.
A subset of members promote violence that's not even condemned.
Arguing they haven't been planting bombs and killing ppl isn't the slam dunk you think it is.
@LabDRN The criticism to this ban from inside Labour is stronger than anything we're gonna see from the opposition benches.
Keep up the good work.
https://t.co/iwbzlfH377
With the buzz around a social media ban for under-16s it's important to remind ourselves just how many failed attempts politicians have made over the years to force on us a 'Digital ID' programme.
This play for control isn't a uniquely Labour initiative.
https://t.co/UxDYLFkwKq
@ReclaimTheNetHQ The Guardian lost their nerve soon after covering Snowdon.
By 2020 they were discounting the authenticity of Hunter Biden emails and signal boosting all sorts of fake news on behalf the US administration.
The Guardian reporters today are total sellouts.
https://t.co/ZuxuFZrO2f
@NickDixon What makes you think the 'fine' journalists assembled for such a press conference would even report it?
If the milquetoast journalists of our conventional media could reliably be trusted to report on major scandals the state would not be fighting so hard to block social media.
Once you look at Government policy with an appreciation for the self-serving interests of our civil service you'll realise these old ideas never truly go away.
The arguments may change, the politicians may be different but the long-term ambition remains.
https://t.co/kWOBHdUd4p
Governments are struggling to overcome modern encryption & they will do everything to convince us a backdoor is in our own best interests. Don't buy into their arguments. They rely on emotional ploys like Terrorism or Coronavirus to justify revoking our innate rights to privacy.
With the buzz around a social media ban for under-16s it's important to remind ourselves just how many failed attempts politicians have made over the years to force on us a 'Digital ID' programme.
This play for control isn't a uniquely Labour initiative.
https://t.co/UxDYLFkwKq
Step 3: Government influence in big tech companies will become increasingly pervasive until we hit a point where infrastructure and levers of power are mature enough to enable broad-scale blacklists and turnkey tyranny during specific "times of crisis".
https://t.co/YkzCPsuHdt
Keir Starmer looking for legacy trying to sound forthright & caring - instead he sounds like an authoritarian dictator :
“This is a choice about whose side we're on: families across the country, or a status quo that isn't working,"
How we keep kids safe online is one of the biggest debates of our time. As a dad, I know every parent wants their child to grow up safe and happy.
"This is a choice about whose side we're on: families across the country, or a status quo that isn't working.
"People rightly expect action, and this government will always stand up for parents and put children first.
"That's why we will call time on a system that's failing our kids and take bold action to give every child the best possible start in life."
YOU are NOT on the side of parents @Keir_Starmer
You are obsessed with imposing digital ID verification to force all adults to ‘prove’ who they are to get on Digital Public Square. With spyware on phones. Your two tier fantasy writ large
We will fight you all the way
https://t.co/Igxhx6wT6V
And the regime and its NPC pundits are trying to persuade voters that @elonmusk is ‘the disinformation’, while they run these operations on the domestic voters as if they’re in Afghanistan
@AaronBastani This needs better coverage too. A recent case where the Judge didn't merely tack on a dubious sentence uplift (still legal) but he replaced the original charge for one that would double the sentence.
He did so at sentencing AFTER accepting a guilty plea.
https://t.co/Q1nDSFS9bD
🚨NEW: A Daily Mail investigation claims a "shadowy" government unit, named RICU, intervenes to write statements by the families of victims of potentially racially linked incidents to stop them from inflaming tensions further with their remarks
[@DailyMail]
@AaronBastani We just want fairness.
You know the CT police are only going after Tommy tonight to try and defuse anger over the Filton 4 trial. I have my own opinions on that trial but how better to win back the Left than engineering a loyalty test to either the CT police or Tommy Robinson.
1. The judge can indeed impose the terrorist connection, whether it is so charged or not, per s.69 Sentencing Act 2020.
2. Crown Court sentences don't set precedents. This is trite - and as an MP, you really ought to know this.
3. The sentences are neither disproportionate, nor wrong. There was serious damage (£1.2m) to property, and a police officer's spine was fractured with a sledgehammer.
What's "wrong" here is that MPs are outraged that people have been appropriately sentenced for such crimes that include GBH by fracturing a police officer's spine with a sledgehammer.
We should not have MPs who think this way.