BREAKING NEWS: O'Keefe Offered Senator Lisa Murkowski's Brother Ballot at Alaskan Polling Location With No ID Required
Anchorage Polling Worker Also Offers Lisa Murkowski’s State Director, Karina Waller's Ballot Without ID on August 18th, Primary Election Day
Murkowski Opposes the SAVE Act, Arguing Voter Documentation Requirements Could Be Difficult for Rural Alaskans
Lisa Murkowski Calls For Prosecution of O'Keefe
I asked the poll worker, “Would it be possible to vote without it [ID]?” They confirmed, “Absolutely possible.”
“You can vote if you’d like to.” The poll workers reassured me that I would still be able to vote without having to show ID.
Poll workers stated, “We’re trying to figure this [voting system] out.”
@lisamurkowski@LisaForSenate
HOLY COW
This needs to break the Internet.
@JamesOKeefeIII went to Alaska during the primary on August 18th
& Election Day Workers were ready to hand him Brian Murkowski’s ballot!
Brian Murkowski is the bother of Senator Lisa Murkowski.
Yes, the same Senator AGAINST the SAVE America Act — who won’t support photo voter ID & proof of citizenship to vote.
You can’t make this up!
If you live in Alaska, please share this with everyone you know & ask them to peacefully call, email, & contact Senator Murkowski’s office.
Please also make a plan to vote ✅ YES to Ballot Measure 2 to DEFEAT Ranked Choice Voting this November.
This is a massive, earth-shattering story.
Our elections aren’t secure & the Senate is doing nothing about it.
Watch Candace Owens' SHOW vs. DEBATE: The contradictions, goalpost moves, and gaslighting.
As one claim after another FALLS APART.
Feat. @paleochristcon
You can know the 7 specific charges and still not have any evidence to substantiate your retarded theories.
I’d hope you know the 7 charges, considering this is all you’ve talked about every single day for the past year.
How does your memorization of the charges prove any of your claims or mean your theories are more likely to be true than the “official narrative”?
Great win how?
She admitted she had no evidence for anything over and over and over again and that her entire case hinges on vibes and feelings.
We have entered a post truth world. Politics can't be evidence free and feelings based.
@JackPosobiec Seriously you report on this but not Candace Owens and all her conspiracy theories involving Charlie? Or her conspiracies about his wife?
Candace: "I've already told you she's 'complicit' in trying to fool the public into thinking this is some open and shut case."
Also Candace: "Erika Kirk should be dragged into a police precinct for questioning."
This is actually a fair challenge. If Candace is REALLY looking out for Charlie, she can take all her podcast revenue and put it in a trust for Charlie's kids. If she wants to, she can write it so that Erika would have no control over it.