Me reading philosopher A: ”yeah this makes total sense”
Me reading philosopher B absolutely ripping A to shreds: ”wow I can’t believe A is such an idiot”
Me reading A again: ”yeah this makes total sense”.
@AStrasser116 Quantum mechanics are… non-physical? What? How the heck does this person define “physical”?
And why would evolution need to explain quantum mechanics 😭 unless they are equivocating on the word “evolution”, QMs aren’t biological…
@matt_olma@Joe_ICHTHUS Oh no, I was a diehard Dawkins fan for a very long time. But his recent turn to transphobia and his ties to Epstein as well as the many accusations that turned out to be true have made me despise him.
Inductive arguments: Conclusions drawn from experience
Deductive arguments: Conclusions drawn from logical reasoning
Conductive arguments: Conclusions drawn from electrical currents
Convective arguments: Conclusions drawn from hot air rising
People missing out on the last two
@matt_olma@Joe_ICHTHUS I'm a staunch Dawkins hater and I hope I'd be "easier" to convert if given sufficient evidence. I can see Dawkins saying "that's not evidence" over and over again.
Having said that... yeah very unlikely I'll convert.
@ArgonGruber Neither! It’s clearly a room-of-requirements argument! Conclusions drawn from the needs of a person, in this case, a urinal!
More seriously though, you drew from your experience that the restroom has a urinal to come to the rational conclusion that you are in a men’s restroom.