@BitGrateful None of these PII stripping services are 100% effective. You still need a human review step at the end, but it can definitely save a lot of time by completing the first 95% or so. It's a significant time saver over the manual process.
@johnwtomkinson@mrdeclanregan@ikwilson@jkenney@MikeLakeMP Did you try clicking on your own link? It doesn't show what you are claiming. The actual link proves you wrong. Is that why you didn't post it? https://t.co/yhrZvlYuqg
If you really care about preventing the spread of "fake news", perhaps you should stop spreading it.
@1929smallfarm@johnwtomkinson@ABStrongABFree@ikwilson@jkenney@MikeLakeMP That specific riding (the one he lives in) was redistricted a few years ago because it included a significant part of south Edmonton that saw huge population growth. So they fixed the problem. That's how our system works for better or worse. He's spreading false information.
@mrdeclanregan@johnwtomkinson@ikwilson@jkenney@MikeLakeMP He won't take it down despite being proven wrong. He's getting too many views. But then he'll complain about the fake news media spreading false information......
Here's a link to the actual district info: https://t.co/yhrZvlYuqg
@bruce_mcgonigal It's odd that you're blaming Mark Carney for a decision that Danielle Smith made. She specifically chose to make the question about a question. It's intentionally unclear. If you think that meets the requirements of the Clarity Act, then perhaps you should try reading it.
"I built Harvey and Legora in two weeks with Claude and made it open-source."
That's the pitch on Mike (https://t.co/qPYtWPQ7Fd).
I haven't tested the code. I won't pretend I have.
But this is the structural inevitability worth paying attention to: when the moat is a UI on top of an LLM, someone will eventually rebuild it on a Saturday.
The lawyers who matter in 2026 won't be on Harvey. They won't be on Mike either.
They'll be running their own agents, configured to their own workflow, on Commercial Terms API.
The vendors are racing the open-source clones.
The future of legal AI isn't a product. It's a workflow you own.
@LilPork07@funtomvids Did he buy those stocks before or after he became PM? Did he make the decision personally, or was it an investment advisor? What decisions were made for his benefit, and what was his involvement in those decisions? I'd happily look at that sort of evidence if you have it.
@LilPork07@funtomvids That is not proof my friend. You are suggesting that he's done something improper, just by showing that he has investments and knows lots of people in Canada. That's evidence he had a successful career outside of politics, not "proof" that he's corrupt.....
@LilPork07@funtomvids I'm open to reviewing actual evidence if you have any, but the fact that a former investment banker holds a wide range of investments shouldn't be surprising to you. It certainly isn't proof of wrongdoing or corruption.
@TeamYouTube Videos have not been posted on the channel for at least 2 years. It has barely been used. I have no idea what the channel URL is. That's part of the problem. I can't see anything when I log in other than the cancellation notice. The username is @allinbusinesslaw if that helps.
@TeamYouTube I'm trying to get some help with the removal of our channel. I can't seem to get support anywhere, or even an explanation of what happened. My emails are not responded to and none of the troubleshooting steps work. Are you able to help?
@TeamYouTube The only explanation I have is that the channel was hacked, which would be pretty damn important for me to know, but I can't even log in to see what was posted. It's pretty frustrating to lose a channel with no explanation and no one to even contact to get an answer. (3/3)
@TeamYouTube The channel had a couple of videos posted years ago. They were made by me and had no copyright infringing material. I have no idea what the issue was, and YouTube hasn't told me anything that would clarify. (2/3)
@TeamYouTube The only information provided was that the channel breached the community guidelines. No warnings or specifics were provided. I already appealed and asked for specifics, but none were given. It was just a statement that the appeal was rejected with no explanation as to why. (1/3)