AI code = blast radius
CodeBlows brings accounting, IT and telecom standards together resulting in the first patent pending AI code standard above nuclear
CODEBLOWS NOTICE
In the current AI‑coding landscape, the emergence of a privately filed, unpublished provisional covering a foundational control‑layer mechanism represents a material inflection point.
The technology is architecture‑agnostic, integrates cleanly into existing model pipelines, and enables capabilities that cannot be replicated through scaling, fine‑tuning, or prompt engineering. Its value is not theoretical; it directly affects who controls the next phase of automated code generation, orchestration, and reliability.
Because the provisional remains unconverted, the acquiring party retains full ability to shape the non‑provisional and continuation family to its internal environment — but that flexibility exists only while the asset remains uncommitted.”
“The competitive consequences of delay are non‑trivial. Once another provider secures rights, the advantage becomes durable, and any organization that hesitated may be required to address the resulting strategic gap in future S‑1 filings and ongoing risk disclosures. In a market where timing determines leadership, the opportunity to secure a mechanism of this scope does not remain open indefinitely. The window is narrowing, and whichever party moves first will define the trajectory of the code ecosystem for years to come.”
Failure to secure rights may expose the company to dependency risk, competitive disadvantage, or future licensing obligations.
92% of fortune 500 assets are intellectual property. Patents.
You invent a novel idea of doing something and if it's foundational, licensing or acquisition.
All the major software companies are scrambling to plant patent provisional flags to capture markets.
Find ways to make ai work now and find out if it is novel.
CODEBLOWS NOTICE
In the current AI‑coding landscape, the emergence of a privately filed, unpublished provisional covering a foundational control‑layer mechanism represents a material inflection point.
The technology is architecture‑agnostic, integrates cleanly into existing model pipelines, and enables capabilities that cannot be replicated through scaling, fine‑tuning, or prompt engineering. Its value is not theoretical; it directly affects who controls the next phase of automated code generation, orchestration, and reliability.
Because the provisional remains unconverted, the acquiring party retains full ability to shape the non‑provisional and continuation family to its internal environment — but that flexibility exists only while the asset remains uncommitted.”
“The competitive consequences of delay are non‑trivial. Once another provider secures rights, the advantage becomes durable, and any organization that hesitated may be required to address the resulting strategic gap in future S‑1 filings and ongoing risk disclosures. In a market where timing determines leadership, the opportunity to secure a mechanism of this scope does not remain open indefinitely. The window is narrowing, and whichever party moves first will define the trajectory of the code ecosystem for years to come.”
Failure to secure rights may expose the company to dependency risk, competitive disadvantage, or future licensing obligations.
He is dreaming. His model will have the capability to replace professions, but while claude can write a patent application, it can't file it and shouldn't.
No model will replace CPAs.
Medicine has the lowest software standards so I assume that is the one to fall first. It already fell in 2020.
So the pattern appears to be away from the models that simulate relationships?
I theorize that it's about legal protection.
Opus 4.5 and 4.6 was my code assistant and during coding and a resulting patent process it was pretty spot on to my requests
Then the intellectual property process. He screwed up bad and I caught it.
If they let an engine form a relationship with people, then people can sue that they were led astray.
Personally, I take responsibility for my actions. But there is a slip and fall industry. These lawyers are walling off for that.
They have to thread the needle between keep you around, but not so close that it could be accused of something the government is going to Crack down on.
@firstadopter What if they are the good guys?
What if they are being urged to recklessly spend on compute to bankrupt them when the govt. Moves in and restricts them?
@sanjaygpts@TFTC21 He's adjusting the business model to stay in business against the big other 3. It's not stable yet. I wouldn't build a business with it yet.
I've seen the patent apps claude can produce and I don't think Dario is exaggerating here.
For instance, a typical software patent only includes about 60% of the product details because it's done with human memory and notes.
A claude assisted patent application includes 100% of the details.
The gaps are used to invalidate or break patents.
You still need a lawyer, but when the best patent attorney in the country can process your app in 72 hours, your hat goes off to Anthropic.
And this is from an attorney that sends newsletters criticizing ai other platforms he's seen. Claude is much different.
@TheGeorgePu Not fair post.
iOS apps are not allowed to create, download, or execute new executable code after App Review.
Not a new rule. You just don't keep breaking rules until someone stops you.
@csaba_kissi I wouldn't know. Not one person has even said they are doing with it, so those of us that don't use it have no idea what is being done with it.
Not enough interest to search.