You seem surprised at how no one helped.
You don't seem to know we are living in the 21st-century and not the 20th.
In the 21st-century, helping means possibly getting sued by the family because they will turn it around to where you "made things worse". Helping means showing you value life when our justice system does not agree with valuing the life of victims but only the life of the perpetrators. Helping means living in the past and not realizing how in the 21st-century human life is practically worthless. Individuals are of no consequence and are quite literally disposable.
I am not saying I agree with any of this. I am saying that when you live in a world where criminals are protected to a far greater degree than victims are, when you see a victim and you have the choice to either help them or mind your own business lest you become a victim, the choice to live in a far less humane 21st-century or regress and act like you're still in the 20th easily favors the 21st-century choice.
This is the world we are collectively creating. You're either on the side of law or chaos and we seem to have collectively chosen chaos as the path forward.
Your surprise that no one helped means you do not live in the real world.
The real world is brutal and devolving and corrupted and rotting and there is no one on your side if your choice is to try to be a good human being.
We created a world where it is far easier to be heartless. The opposite of love is not hate. The opposite of love is indifference.
When you hate something you actually care enough to hate it.
When you are indifferent to something, you don't give a funk one way or the other.
Bravo 21st-century man.
You have been neutered and de-gendered.
Enjoy your future.
One more question since you're posting your Wolverine stack:
I understand these research stacks are experimental and evolving and not all providers will have the same formulations or combinations and I understand PH levels in vials as well as interactions between peptides could be an issue (which is why some question GHK-CU in same solution for example), but why the departure from the standard addition of KPV and GHK-CU to a typical "Wolverine" stack?
@greg_price11 Yes, so would all liberals.
This is why kind hearted liberals kept all of the poor immigrants needing help when they were sent to Martha's Vineyard.
Who needs rich neighbors when you can have undocumented ones?
Liberals are the best people on earth!
@megantheevalium You're ridiculous.
You date pretty boys and expect them not to fool around?
You'll probably realize the errors of your ways when you're in your 30s but by then the men you want to marry we'll all be taken.
But your responses to the apes you're conversing with (myself included) prove the purpose of evolution.
There is no universe or reality where two evolved apes would be discussing whether evolution has purpose other than a reality where evolution had purpose.
Consciousness makes no logical sense and has no inherent purpose.
Any other combination of carbon, water, trace elements and minerals would continue to exist whether said grouping of elements was conscious or not.
Two "unevolved" rocks don't have these conversations.
You arguing against evolutionary purpose proves evolutionary propose.
@SHASHAN34519256@axabhishek_0309@sama No, it's not one number. That is why there is a space between 10, (space) and 100.
It reads, "offer me 10... (or) 100 times"
You have to leave the door open to the possibility that the proliferation of consciousness is purposeful.
"The universe understanding itself" kind of thing -the effect of the observer in quantum mechanics as
evidence for example.
If that is the case, we are definitely purposed to reproduce and evolve and spread said consciousness.
@axabhishek_0309@sama Not true my brother. I can't imagine my life without my two beautiful sons.
Offer me 10, 100 times my wealth and it couldn't possibly compare to a dinner with my child.
It's that some choose narcissism over their ultimate evolutionary purpose in life.