1. Longevity in humans is linked to optimal solar exposure. The reason is simple. This protects the 7 layers of energy generation inside a cell. The more sun human gets the more diseases they can avoid and the #1 risk of most diseases is AGE. Solar exposure effectively makes you younger because it lengthens the TET mechanism inside of cells to improve the HAyflick limit in all cell lines. It is not hard to understand when your perspective is decentralized.
@____Holyspawn@hodlonaut Ordinals and base chain noice will kill decentralization… and only the elite bankster will control bitcoin one less node at the time.
Jaw-dropping really, but when
you realize that the entire allopathic death cult is predicated on giving people little bits of poison until
they either get better on their own despite the poison for the disease to come again soon or die from the
poison. https://t.co/s9DnJE8bTx
@LeonLyuLv jep, 100 MB+ blocks mid-exponential growth: >5 TB/year → 50–100+ TB/node. Only racks work. Average person cannot store or power it. Centralisation for the elites, no peer to peer.
@zndtoshi 100 MB+ blocks with mid-exponential growth: >5 TB/year → 50–100+ TB/node. Only racks work. Average person cannot store or power it. Full centralisation, and no peer to peer. Osiffication of information and time theft. Run BIP-110.
100 MB+ blocks (mid-exponential growth): >5 TB/year → 50–100+ TB/node. Only racks work. Average person cannot store or power it. Centralisation and no peer to peer. Ossification of the network. Time theft.
@ClioBitcoinBank@MarcanoFilms This is so, so myopia. - 100 MB+ blocks (mid-exponential): >5 TB/year → 50–100+ TB/node. Only racks work. Average person cannot store or power it. Eg. centralisation and not peer to peer.
I started running a Bitcoin Core node in late 2024. In February 2025, before I was aware of the spam debate and just a couple of months before it really took off on X, I switched to @BitcoinKnots.
At the time Knots was about 2% of the network. I was concerned about the concentration of Core nodes so I was looking for another option. After reading about Knots and @LukeDashjr it seemed like a right choice.
My node verifies the transactions for my family of bitcoiners and controls 20 PH/s of hashrate which is signaling for BIP110.
I'm one of the thousands of bitcoiners who doesn't want @bitcoincoreorg the final say over protocol development because I consider their actions over the last few years to be detrimental to #Bitcoin.
Reaction to @MrHodl and @w_s_bitcoin on @_DannyKnowles
Most notably absent from the podcast is any consideration about what happens if/when BIP110 succeeds.
- Core isn't a full node any more - what do they do?
- Miners running Core will mine invalid blocks. Do they all run Knots? Does something else manifest?
- What happens to the scam companies like Citrea "building" on Bitcoin?
Further - is it failed, what would the consequences be for the Bitcoin chain? What can we expect to end up in these permanently normalized large OP_RETURNs? Are you going to run a node if the worst happens in that regard?
If the UTXO set continues to blow up with witness abuse and we lose more low end hardware is that a sustainable path?
@GrassFedBitcoin@MrHodl@w_s_bitcoin@_DannyKnowles Larger blocks under exponential pressure accelerate physical growth, heat, and EM load. Keep blocks small so every independent node can physically host the truth — or decentralization dies by its own exponential weight.
Larger blocks under exponential pressure accelerate physical growth, heat, and EM load. Keep blocks small so every independent node can physically host the truth — or decentralization dies by its own exponential weight. #bitcoin