@TheIrishTiger40@BellegardeSZN Numbers, Sets and Functions was the name of the module. Idk how you made it that far and didnโt realise that being next to the brackets simply implies a * and nothing more
I find it so dystopian that people have savings accounts. Youโre 24 years old with ยฃ5,000 sitting there and you havenโt even been to New York Fashion Week? What exactly are you saving for?
Capitalism didn't create your need to work to survive. Nature did.
An employer doesn't impose that necessity upon you. He offers you an opportunity to satisfy it through voluntary exchange.
Socialism doesn't eliminate the necessity of work. It merely transfers authority over production to politicians or the collective.
Under capitalism, you're free to change employers, negotiate wages, work for yourself, or establish a cooperative. None guarantees success, but the freedom exists.
And here's where your moral superiority becomes particularly ridiculous.
You condemn people for offering employment on terms others are free to reject, yet consider yourself morally entitled to dictate how they must use their property, run their businesses, and compensate others.
You call voluntary agreements exploitation while presenting coercion as compassion.
Your objection isn't that people are being forced to serve others. It's that they aren't being forced to serve others on your terms.
And somehow, you've convinced yourself that makes you the moral one.
@fanofstu@alexthegoodlife@idobadtakes@SparkingFIRENC itโs good to let the people keep more of their money, because it allows real supply and demand do be reflected, and for prices to signal what people want
Housing, food, education and healthcare are all human rights. Having to choose between paying rent and eating dinner is an act of violence. Not being able to access decent healthcare is an act of violence. Being unable to afford an education is an act of violence