ShayLogan MetroState

My official(ish) twitter account as a community faculty member in the math department at Metropolitan State University.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@resham_firiri LTB part 3 is now officially on D2L

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@resham_firiri ok cool, thanks for letting me know. I’ll make sure to upload it.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@JackHysell hey, sorry I haven’t responded. There will be a mass email going out soon that will address this. Short version: you’ll be ok.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@JackHysell Well, what’s actual is definitely possible, if that helps on the first point. And not everything is possibly true...

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@JackHysell hi Jack! Sound arguments can never have false conclusions. Valid arguments can. Does that help at all?

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@kckode not planning to. Sorry. Unless I run short on cash, I'm planning to take the next two semesters off from metro.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew look at how you did it for Q3 and you'll see this is what you did -- two q2s colored opposite ways.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew so there are two ways to two color Q3. Q4 is two copies of q3 pasted together, just color first copy one way other the other.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew yeah. coloring idea makes it all click. If bipartite, can two color, say with red and blue. But then you can swap the colors.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew paste these two different ways of coloring Qn with two colors together, but backwards (try with Q3 and you'll see what I mean)

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew idea: you can see for q=1&2 that it works. If it works for Qn, then one can color Qn with two colors in two ways.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew uh oh. Looks like it works for Q3 too. I think it works for all n. Idea to follow.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@KestellDrew Q? Hmmm... For K you have the right answer. For Q I think you're also right. Argument to follow.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@vikes011 I can't tell one style from another, so just use what you know.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

I'll be headed in soon if anyone has last minute questions.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@emmakallme I don't recall, and I'm away from my notes right now. If anyone is listening and knows the answer, feel free to chime in.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@vikes011 try to draw a picture of the sets and see what they look like! You should see that (0,1) is in (0,2) is in (0,3)...hope that helps

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@emmakallme yay for twitter tutoring!

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@emmakallme that doesn't look like 1+1+1+1 to me, but it does look like you've done 1111+111+11+1 correctly.

[ShayLogan MetroState @Logan_MSU_Math]

@emmakallme good good, and great photo. Now do exactly the same thing as you did in that photo, but with a column of ones; i.e.
1
1
1
+1