I don't get why folks who are anti AI focus so much on the quality of its output instead of the fact that it's inherently disgusting to see entire industries wiped out by it & the creation of art slowly being relegated more and more to machines.
AI will continue to get better and better until it's outputs are indistinguishable from reality, but I still will believe art not created by humans is inherently soulless. The value in the art to me has always been in the skill and story of the artist who created it, and were able to evoke whatever emotion in us as a result.
By focusing so much on the quality of the output being the issue instead of the fact that it's inherently wrong & unwanted I feel like we send the wrong message to it's creators. We let them know that they only have to eliminate the tells AI art still has for us to accept AI created art as being of the same value as that created by humans.
This time of year is very stressful for sensitive young men with too many light jackets. Very hard to squeeze them all into just 3 weeks of light jacket weather.
george orwell made a lot of stupid predictions in 1984. for example, he thought that there would be two minutes of hate every day towards some sort of television screen. the reality is that it's more like five hours of hate and it's all on your phone.
🚨 Former Manchester United captain, Michael Carrick, would be open to a return to the club in some sort of capacity. He has been discussed as a potential assistant or caretaker if the club wanted to have someone in charge until the end of the season from October/November through to end of season. They would then keep him on the staff in this instance, I understand.