@matthewstoller the CEO won’t let you film -him- in public’ or ‘they got breached & exposed your data to malicious actors’. Against no real coverage of success, neither ‘flock was used to solve specific crime’ or ‘general stat improvement in areas using it’
@matthewstoller Suspect it begins rooted in the American dislike of being surveilled (always resist red light cams/plate readers), takes on specificity w/ the ambient news environment being almost uniformly negative. Always ‘some authority figure used flock for something perverted/stalking’ or
@JohnnyMcIvor Nah, too generalized. Might be true for some, but I never had any such trauma, am highly socially capable, & I definitely don’t enjoy suits for childlike/age regression reasons…in fact, those put me off.
The regression i’m interested in is base nature. Can share more if you want
@fightinbobbyl@Slatzism@fujimotosloyal Well look at me, spreading misinformation. All the photos I saw looked mannish so, guess he’s pulling it off lawl
@Slatzism@fujimotosloyal You’ll never believe it but it actually appears that one or maybe two of the three bar owners and the story’s main antagonist ‘noire’ are, in fact, men
@FalconryFinance This is some of the most pathetic self-soothing I’ve ever seen on here, because in your heart of hearts you know exactly why.
As the kids might say, spiritually israeli.
@bluecoyote@DustinDoggo If dem primary voters are stupid enough to nominate that vapid windbag, well, they’ll deserve the result.
But strangely, I feel pretty confident that they won’t! She’s a terrible campaigner, & it would turn out like her last primary run.
@QiaochuYuan Im even willing to grant that most are trying to do good. But it’s hard to escape the conclusion that they are simply fundamentally flawed on some level and mustnt be allowed to have decision making authority, bc their attempts to do good so often lead to bad. Sbf, HF report, etc
@danwilliamsphil plenty sufficient, because the only people who are going to push for this are almost certainly nefarious in their intentions with doing so, and should not be given an inch with qualifications or any hemming and hawing.
@danwilliamsphil But more importantly, thinking on a deeper level is fine for chats with friends & whatnot, but in terms of public communications there needs to be a simple message. ‘No, the thing wearing an anthropomorphic skinsuit is not actually adjacent to humans and doesn’t need rights’ is