BREAKING: “The U.S. has sent a small team of troops to Nigeria, the general in charge of the U.S. command for Africa said on Tuesday, the first acknowledgment of U.S. forces on the ground since Washington struck by air on Christmas Day” - Reuters.
🚨🇷🇺🇺🇸 BREAKING
Moscow sends a stark warning to Washington. Russia declares that any US strike on Iran would be completely unacceptable and would rank as a monumental mistake with disastrous consequences.
BREAKING:
🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 Iran is successfully jamming Starlink and GPS through which the US and Israel coordinate protests - Al Jazeera reports
30% drop in users and the number is increasing.
FORGED 2025 TAX REFORM
This isn’t just about “forging,” it’s a systematic hand over of collective and individual sovereignty to France, Britain and western colonial actors. They claim Nigeria is their corporation and this is the final phase of the hand over of both Nigeria and her unfortunate citizens to these wicked colonials. Tinubu is becoming an even bigger curse than I had anticipated. This would be his greatest undoing. He will never succeed.
BREAKING: Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe has initiated impeachment proceedings against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at the National Assembly,
alleging that the president misled the Senate regarding the France tax reform bill.
The motion has reportedly passed its second reading,
with a majority of senators present said to be in support.
The move has stirred significant political tension,
signaling growing willingness within the legislature to challenge and scrutinize the presidency.
Source: IPOB news worldwide 🤣🤣🤣
“Shielk Gumi, he said that everywhere he went to meet with the terrorist jihadist and bandits , DSS is with him, police is with him, NDI is with him, every security apparatus is with him. So, if they are with him, they know the destination or location of the band!ts. It’s simple common sense.
@NGRSenate@AEIfdp@WalidPhares@RepRileyMoore
Good morning, and Happy New Month to all my conscious ladies and gentlemen.
As we step into the final month of 2025, I invite us to begin grounding ourselves in our shared goal of Conscious Transformation.
Take a moment to reflect:
● How have you transformed over the past ten months?
●Have you released toxic behaviours, the draining of others’ energy, the hatred and unforgiveness that corrodes within, the envy and jealousy that weaken the spirit?
●Have you let go of slander for gain, the lies and blackmail carried about, the darkness that clouds your path?
●Have you embraced critical thinking, rational analysis, and chosen to walk in the light?
Underline the areas where growth is still needed, and join me on 19 December 2025 as we hold space together for deep Reflection.
"Reflection is Revolution"!
Core Taglines
Walk in Light, Transform in Truth
From Darkness to Conscious Transformation
Reflection is Revolution
Healing Ourselves, Healing the World.
#ConsciousTransformation2025
#WalkInLight
#Reflection2025
#HealingThroughTruth
#GlobalConsciousFamily
#LightOverDarkness
I just exited from meeting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in #SokotoPrison. He remains indomitable & expressed his profound gratitudes to all who have stood by him. Like Nelson Mandela endured ‘Robben Island’ & triumphed, #MNK is enduring Sokoto with resilience & strength.
PUBLIC BRIEFING
ISSUED BY: NJOKU JUDE NJOKU, ESQ.
FOR THE MAZI NNAMDI KANU GLOBAL DEFENCE CONSORTIUM
DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER 2025.
OMOTOSHO’S JUDGMENT IS A LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY:
CONVICTION UNDER A REPEALED LAW CANNOT STAND
DATE: 22/11/2025
The Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Defence Consortium wishes to inform the Nigerian public, the Bar, and the international community that the 20 November 2025 judgment delivered by Hon. Justice James Omotosho in FRN v. Nnamdi Kanu is unsustainable in law, untenable under the Constitution, and void for want of jurisdiction.
This is not rhetoric. It is a matter of black-letter law, constitutional command, and non-negotiable legal principle.
1. THE COURT CONVICTED UNDER A LAW THAT NO LONGER EXISTS
By Section 104 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 - the very statute Justice Omotosho relied upon was fully repealed.
A repealed law is a dead law.
A court cannot revive it.
A conviction cannot stand on it.
Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution is emphatic:
No person shall be convicted unless the offence is defined and the penalty prescribed in a written law.
“Written law” means a law in force on the day of conviction.
On 20 November 2025, the 2013 Act was not in force.
It is legally impossible to convict anyone under it.
This alone renders the judgment a nullity.
2. SAVINGS CLAUSES CANNOT RESURRECT A REPEALED CRIMINAL STATUTE
The Prosecution unsuccessfully attempted to rely on a “savings clause” in the 2022 Act.
But Nigerian law is clear:
Savings clauses preserve pending matters.
They do not create new proceedings.
They do not override the Constitution.
They do not resurrect repealed laws.
After the Court of Appeal’s 13 October 2022 discharge, there was no “pending” proceeding to save.
What followed in 2023 was a new trial, which cannot be rooted in a repealed law.
The attempt to use a transitional clause as a resurrection tool is legally impermissible.
3. THE EXTANT 2022 TERRORISM ACT NARROWS TERRORISM AND EXCLUDES NON-VIOLENT POLITICAL EXPRESSION
The TPPA 2022—the only governing statute—materially changes Nigerian terrorism law:
Terrorism now requires conduct involving violence or grievous harm.
Non-violent protest, advocacy, dissent, and political agitation are expressly excluded.
The allegations against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu relate to speeches, broadcasts, and political advocacy.
These do not meet the definition of terrorism under the 2022 Act.
The Constitution (Section 36(8)) also requires courts to apply the lighter or more favourable law—in this case, the TPPA 2022.
The trial court failed to do so.
4. THE RESULT: A JUDGMENT THAT COLLAPSES UNDER ITS OWN CONTRADICTIONS
By convicting under a repealed law, ignoring the controlling statute, and applying a harsher non-existent regime, the judgment:
violates Section 1(3) (Supremacy of the Constitution),
breaches Section 36(8), 36(9), 36(12),
lacks jurisdiction, and
is incapable of withstanding appellate review.
These are not technicalities.
They go to the foundation of the criminal justice system.
5. THE DEFENCE POSITION
We state categorically:
This judgment will not survive appellate scrutiny.
A Notice of Appeal will be filed filed.
The grounds are rooted firmly in:
constitutional supremacy,
statutory repeal,
the doctrine of nullity, and
the mandatory application of the extant 2022 Act.
The Consortium remains confident that the Court of Appeal will restore legality, uphold constitutional norms, and vacate this defective conviction.
Signed:
Njoku Jude Njoku, Esq.
For the Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Defence Consortium.
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow
PUBLIC BRIEFING NOTE
Issued by: Onyedikachi Ifedi, Esq.
For: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Defence Consortium
Date: 11 November 2025
JUSTICE OMOTOSHO MUST HEAR THE MOTION TO ARREST JUDGMENT BEFORE PROCEEDING: THE NON-DEROGABLE RIGHT TO FAIR HEARING AND THE RULE OF LAW
1. The Motion to Arrest Judgment Is a Lawful, Binding Judicial Process:
On 10 November 2025, the defence of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu filed a Motion to Arrest Judgment before the Federal High Court, Abuja, presided over by Hon. Justice James Omotosho.
That motion is not political theatre; it is a recognized legal procedure in Nigerian criminal jurisprudence, designed to prevent a court from delivering judgment where jurisdictional or foundational defects remain unresolved.
Although the phrase “arrest of judgment” appears in procedural legislation such as the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, its constitutional foundation rests on Section 36(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), which guarantees every person “the right to be heard before any decision affecting his rights or obligations is made.”
To “arrest” judgment is, therefore, to compel obedience to the Constitution—to ensure that no judgment is delivered in breach of the right to fair hearing. It is a lawful, binding, and time-honoured judicial safeguard against miscarriage of justice.
2. Fair Hearing Is Non-Derogable and Universally Binding:
Fair hearing is not a privilege granted by a court; it is the oxygen of justice itself.
It cannot be suspended, diluted, or deferred—not even by judicial convenience.
In Kotoye v. CBN (1989) 1 NWLR (Pt. 98) 419 at 448, the Supreme Court held that
“Fair hearing lies not in the correctness of a decision but in the opportunity afforded to be heard before the decision is made.”
A judgment delivered while a live motion—especially one that questions jurisdiction or competence—is pending, is constitutionally void.
To ignore such a motion is to act in defiance of Section 36(1) and to deliver a verdict without legal life.
3. Why This Motion Matters Now:
Justice Omotosho has announced his intention to deliver final judgment on 20 November 2025, even though several pending motions remain unheard, including the Motion to Arrest Judgment filed on 10 November 2025.
These motions directly question the court’s jurisdiction, the subsistence of any valid charge, and the validity of the plea entered on 29 March 2025.
To proceed to judgment without determining them would be to pronounce upon nothingness—a legal absurdity.
4. Setting the Record Straight: Kanu Has Entered His Defence:
The persistent claim that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu “refused to enter defence” is false and misleading.
He entered his defence fully within the meaning of law by subjecting the prosecution’s witnesses to rigorous cross-examination, during which their credibility and the integrity of the government’s evidence were demolished on record.
Under Nigerian criminal procedure, cross-examination of prosecution witnesses forms part of the defence’s evidentiary case.
Having dismantled the prosecution’s case under cross-examination, Kanu has no obligation to call witnesses in defence of a charge that itself is a nullity.
What he has declined to do is to call witnesses to validate a non-existent charge, because the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 under which he was purportedly tried has long been repealed and supplanted by the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022.
He cannot defend himself against a mirage.
5. The Legal Consequences if the Motion Is Ignored:
If Justice Omotosho proceeds to deliver judgment without first hearing and determining the Motion to Arrest Judgment:
He will have denied the accused a constitutional right to be heard;
He will have acted without jurisdiction, as the competence of the court remains under challenge;
Continue in the comment section 👇