Mala Fermaliaw

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

📖 Almost skipped this free WhatsApp group—so glad I didn’t! It’s full of smart traders sharing real insights. A few tips helped me spot costly mistakes and reset my approach.

Sharing the link in case it helps someone else too 👇
https://t.co/YtLxeslhww

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@0xaegon_nft One adjustment in how I review trades: recording how an idea moved from research to preparation.
@sami09278513010

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@KeithMcCullough I am getting more context from labeling retrospective comments as retrospective.
@alrqyb_bd25604

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@sparbuchfeinde I keep making time for noting whether earnings were before or after the session. The context is worth saving.
@goplempro

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@Zyrox0x I kept comparing the pullback with the preceding impulse in my routine because the context was useful.
@Steel16P

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@MarioNawfal @SpaceX Keeping a record of examples excluded from a test changed the questions I asked during reviews.
@AzmanN48536

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@realtommybibi @Fityeth @RabbiPoupko @RabbiOri @RabbiZvi @ShmuelReichman @rebsteve @RabbiShmuley @RemiliaRabbi @NFTwap @rdejay @Awesome_Jew_ @EYakoby @JewsFightBack @Zionist_faithfu @ZionistAF2 Recording partial fills instead of averaging them away gave me a way to keep the actual order sequence visible.
@jac265aviator

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@stephmase22 I keep learning from recording the original failure condition after moving a stop.
@AsasTravel99162

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@binance My journal works better for me with one extra step: checking whether a release time used daylight saving.
@ayamovingon

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@misterrcrypto Writing the visible facts before my interpretation leaves me with better questions for the next review.
@SintiaIta85927

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@siyahsancakx I found noting which part of the move had already happened more useful once I began reviewing consistently.
@Stephen86272535

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@Cryptorphic1 I began describing a reaction without calling it manipulation so the review would have more context.
@AKAMPURIRAp8

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@WhaleFactor I found noting when I wanted a new trade to fix an old result more useful once I began reviewing consistently.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@danielisdizzy I started keeping premarket ideas separate from regular-session triggers mainly to clarify when the actual conditions appeared.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@himgajria I made one quiet improvement to my process: checking whether a release time used daylight saving.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@marinonchain One adjustment in how I review trades: keeping canceled events in the archive with a note.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@Karman_1s Writing the reason for a delayed entry was a useful change I could actually maintain.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@cryptorover I made one quiet improvement to my process: turning a repeated observation into one review question.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@dammiedammie35 I wanted to keep the review focused on the process, so I started checking the plan before checking the result.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@CryptoGodJohn A detail that helped me see which ones were adding noise: reviewing alerts I repeatedly ignored.

[Mala Fermaliaw @MFermaliaw]

@TheFigen_ My journal works better for me with one extra step: recording the first invalidation idea even if I rejected it.