Multiple days passed and i being an ordinary trader lost payout and account and no one is accountable for that
Sad to see that many people tagged them
But no response
@Kelvintalent_ mentor you are the last hope in this case
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@imitini
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal
So I got rejected after 15 days wait saying What ?
I used Vps
I made 1 payout from Same Account and I passed before VPS rule Introduced
I never Used Vps and i can give Any proof to support my claim @Kelvintalent_ need your Help mentor
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal
So I got rejected after 15 days wait saying What ?
I used Vps
I made 1 payout from Same Account and I passed before VPS rule Introduced
I never Used Vps and i can give Any proof to support my claim @Kelvintalent_ need your Help mentor
@tradeifyforex
So am i the only one from the earliest of the watchlist who has not got 100K yet ??
becuase as far as i know
i am following you from the day i got the news of your launch and also in your watchlist for the start
🚨 GOAT FUNDED HAS MULTIPLE PUBLIC PAYOUT DISPUTES — TRADERS ARE ASKING FOR CLEAR ANSWERS
Over the last few days, we’ve seen several traders publicly raise payout/rejection issues involving @GoatFunded.
Different traders, different situations — but the same thing keeps coming up: traders want to know exactly what evidence led to the decision.
Here’s what’s been publicly raised:
Copy / coordinated trading claims @waleedbanks — says he already received around $12.5K from GFT and is now facing a copy-trading issue.
@AnTrader1989 — says $14K was rejected, another $6K is pending, while he previously received around $28K.
@Saurabh__0070 — disputes the copy-trading allegation and says the trading activity wasn’t his.
@PhilBro14326231 — says his payout was rejected over copy trading and is still waiting for a response.
@NIXTRADEZ — says a $1.2K payout was rejected despite having received 2 previous payouts.
@Range___Trader — disputes a group/coordinated-trading allegation and has asked for IP logs and timestamps.
@MirMuneeb999 — says his account was closed over a group-trading allegation.
VPS / compliance cases @ByronStuart5550 — has a $9,813.73 payout dispute and says the issue involves VPS/interview-related concerns.
@MQD_00 — has also raised a VPS-related dispute.
Other public disputes @RahulRoy4756368 — margin-related case.
@Chukwudiii — says his case involves an 80% margin issue.
@Real_capital — Futures Flex case involving the 5 profitable trading days requirement.
Still pending @TommieDeji21@Apnaprince631
To be clear: these are trader allegations and public claims, not findings that the traders did or did not break the rules.
But if a payout is rejected because of copy trading, coordinated trading, VPS activity or another rule, traders are asking for something pretty simple:
What exactly was detected?
Which trades matched?
What IP/timestamp evidence exists?
And which specific rule was breached?
That’s the part traders want clarity on.
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@Sammy_GFT
#GoatFunded #GFT #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payout #PayoutDispute #FundedTrader #TradingCommunity #PropFirmNews
🚨 GOAT FUNDED HAS MULTIPLE PUBLIC PAYOUT DISPUTES — TRADERS ARE ASKING FOR CLEAR ANSWERS
Over the last few days, we’ve seen several traders publicly raise payout/rejection issues involving @GoatFunded.
Different traders, different situations — but the same thing keeps coming up: traders want to know exactly what evidence led to the decision.
Here’s what’s been publicly raised:
Copy / coordinated trading claims @waleedbanks — says he already received around $12.5K from GFT and is now facing a copy-trading issue.
@AnTrader1989 — says $14K was rejected, another $6K is pending, while he previously received around $28K.
@Saurabh__0070 — disputes the copy-trading allegation and says the trading activity wasn’t his.
@PhilBro14326231 — says his payout was rejected over copy trading and is still waiting for a response.
@NIXTRADEZ — says a $1.2K payout was rejected despite having received 2 previous payouts.
@Range___Trader — disputes a group/coordinated-trading allegation and has asked for IP logs and timestamps.
@MirMuneeb999 — says his account was closed over a group-trading allegation.
VPS / compliance cases @ByronStuart5550 — has a $9,813.73 payout dispute and says the issue involves VPS/interview-related concerns.
@MQD_00 — has also raised a VPS-related dispute.
Other public disputes @RahulRoy4756368 — margin-related case.
@Chukwudiii — says his case involves an 80% margin issue.
@Real_capital — Futures Flex case involving the 5 profitable trading days requirement.
Still pending @TommieDeji21@Apnaprince631
To be clear: these are trader allegations and public claims, not findings that the traders did or did not break the rules.
But if a payout is rejected because of copy trading, coordinated trading, VPS activity or another rule, traders are asking for something pretty simple:
What exactly was detected?
Which trades matched?
What IP/timestamp evidence exists?
And which specific rule was breached?
That’s the part traders want clarity on.
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@Sammy_GFT
#GoatFunded #GFT #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payout #PayoutDispute #FundedTrader #TradingCommunity #PropFirmNews
🚨 GOAT FUNDED HAS MULTIPLE PUBLIC PAYOUT DISPUTES — TRADERS ARE ASKING FOR CLEAR ANSWERS
Over the last few days, we’ve seen several traders publicly raise payout/rejection issues involving @GoatFunded.
Different traders, different situations — but the same thing keeps coming up: traders want to know exactly what evidence led to the decision.
Here’s what’s been publicly raised:
Copy / coordinated trading claims @waleedbanks — says he already received around $12.5K from GFT and is now facing a copy-trading issue.
@AnTrader1989 — says $14K was rejected, another $6K is pending, while he previously received around $28K.
@Saurabh__0070 — disputes the copy-trading allegation and says the trading activity wasn’t his.
@PhilBro14326231 — says his payout was rejected over copy trading and is still waiting for a response.
@NIXTRADEZ — says a $1.2K payout was rejected despite having received 2 previous payouts.
@Range___Trader — disputes a group/coordinated-trading allegation and has asked for IP logs and timestamps.
@MirMuneeb999 — says his account was closed over a group-trading allegation.
VPS / compliance cases @ByronStuart5550 — has a $9,813.73 payout dispute and says the issue involves VPS/interview-related concerns.
@MQD_00 — has also raised a VPS-related dispute.
Other public disputes @RahulRoy4756368 — margin-related case.
@Chukwudiii — says his case involves an 80% margin issue.
@Real_capital — Futures Flex case involving the 5 profitable trading days requirement.
Still pending @TommieDeji21@Apnaprince631
To be clear: these are trader allegations and public claims, not findings that the traders did or did not break the rules.
But if a payout is rejected because of copy trading, coordinated trading, VPS activity or another rule, traders are asking for something pretty simple:
What exactly was detected?
Which trades matched?
What IP/timestamp evidence exists?
And which specific rule was breached?
That’s the part traders want clarity on.
@GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@Sammy_GFT
#GoatFunded #GFT #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payout #PayoutDispute #FundedTrader #TradingCommunity #PropFirmNews
What I don’t understand is how they can terminate the accounts over alleged VPS usage while completely ignoring when those accounts were purchased. Mine pre-date the 12 August 2026 rule change, and their own policy says the new restriction does not apply to them. One is even Instant GOAT, which they list as permitting VPS. I’ve raised this directly and I’m still waiting for them to address that specific point.
What I don’t understand is how they can terminate the accounts over alleged VPS usage while completely ignoring when those accounts were purchased. Mine pre-date the 12 August 2026 rule change, and their own policy says the new restriction does not apply to them. One is even Instant GOAT, which they list as permitting VPS. I’ve raised this directly and I’m still waiting for them to address that specific point.
Exactly that’s what you call injustice
No proof
Nothing shown
Only saying they have evidence
When we are saying we are ready to prove we did not used any VPS
No response
Disgraceful from @GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@imitini@Haruna_gft
Still waiting for a response from Goat Funded Trader regarding my breached accounts and rejected payouts.
The reason given was alleged VPS usage, with the violation email stating that VPS use is prohibited.
However, GFT’s own published rules state that accounts purchased BEFORE 12 August 2026 are NOT affected by the new VPS restriction.
My account shown below was started 30 April 2026, months before that rule change. It is also an Instant GOAT account — which their own policy specifically lists as an account type where VPS remains permitted.
I also maintain that I did not use a VPS and have asked GFT to provide the specific evidence behind their allegation.
I’ve submitted the evidence and I’m still waiting for the Risk Team to respond. I just want this reviewed fairly against the rules that applied to my accounts.
The screenshots below show the violation notice, their VPS policy, and my account details.
@GoatFunded@PropFirmShinobi@propfirm_watch
Still waiting for a response from Goat Funded Trader regarding my breached accounts and rejected payouts.
The reason given was alleged VPS usage, with the violation email stating that VPS use is prohibited.
However, GFT’s own published rules state that accounts purchased BEFORE 12 August 2026 are NOT affected by the new VPS restriction.
My account shown below was started 30 April 2026, months before that rule change. It is also an Instant GOAT account — which their own policy specifically lists as an account type where VPS remains permitted.
I also maintain that I did not use a VPS and have asked GFT to provide the specific evidence behind their allegation.
I’ve submitted the evidence and I’m still waiting for the Risk Team to respond. I just want this reviewed fairly against the rules that applied to my accounts.
The screenshots below show the violation notice, their VPS policy, and my account details.
@GoatFunded@PropFirmShinobi@propfirm_watch
@ByronStuart5550 Exactly that’s what you call injustice
No proof
Nothing shown
Only saying they have evidence
When we are saying we are ready to prove we did not used any VPS
No response
Disgraceful from @GoatFunded@EdwardXLreal@imitini@Haruna_gft
@AnTrader1989 That’s bad
really sorry to hear
It took a lot of effort to make 500 and yours is 14K inded much effort was done by you
Hope you make bigger payouts than this
Another victim Same as me by flase allegations of Using VPS
GFT said they have proof > they are not giving proof > not responding too
i don't know but why would we use VPS when we can trade on Mobile like WHY??
#GoatFundedTrader#GFT#PropFirm#PayoutDispute#TraderRights
@PropFirmsGuru@the5erstrading@Rajkuma66295964 Help my account was breached over ip vps that I don’t even own. They are not even responding to me again. After passing all the phases @GoatFunded decided to breach my account, I don’t even own a VPS
@PropFirmsGuru@the5erstrading@Rajkuma66295964 Help my account was breached over ip vps that I don’t even own. They are not even responding to me again. After passing all the phases @GoatFunded decided to breach my account, I don’t even own a VPS