MSN

American

[Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll]

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - June 8, 1949

[Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll]

Good Morning !

That "Simple Mix-Up."

When you dare suggest follow-on questions about "a simple mix-up" and get told to shut up by paid partisan AstroTurf and now a NY Times employee you should ask why. Especially given last night's request by @USAttyEssayli

Since American legacy media is forbidden to cover actual developments in new election fraud evidence gathering readers may be unaware of recent court filings and depositions. Here are just three links -

Virtual Machines ->https://t.co/OBx1Uy244U
Federal Whistleblower Testimony -> https://t.co/U0i7oAb5N9
Made In CCP China -> https://t.co/Bg3NTigEkU

[MSN @MSN1776]

@californiapost The final count will show that Raman moves forward just because of mail in ballots that were received after Election Day.

[MSN @MSN1776]

They don’t won’t any job that requires you to break a sweat. The ones that don’t mind are actually really great money.

The time of coddling kids and refusing to whip them has to end. This liberal way of parenting has been proven to be ineffective. Best example is corporal punishment at school. Many problems would be solved if you brought it back.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@GuntherEagleman I think I know how to fix it and be fair.

If your child gets arrested twice. Then you lose all federal and state benefits.

Guarantee that will cut a lot of this out.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@LeeHarris

[TaraBull @TaraBull]

Canada's Mental Health Act is sparking outrage. A doctor can "certify" you mentally ill, and police can detain & ARREST you on the spot for involuntary assessment.

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

Even Arab leaders admit it.

Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.

Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.

Ok, so let us set that aside.

Now watch this.

In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.

Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.

He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.

The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.

This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.

When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.

The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.

This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.

If you value the truth, please share.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@RoKhanna @nytopinion The government has allowed billions of dollars to be stolen by fraudsters. No one needs to be taxed more. We need serious penalties for thieves that steal our money!

[Leading Report @LeadingReport]

Butler County, PA Sheriff’s deputy exchanged two emails with Thomas Matthew Crooks before the July 13, 2024 Trump rally sh—ting, per Judicial Watch.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@_LaJanee_ Wonder why Anthony couldn’t just leave when asked to do so multiple times? Also, why did he think he could sit in a tent that was not affiliated with his school?

[John Rich🇺🇸 @johnrich]

I wonder who at The White House might be able to make this happen? This man has earned it, and what a GREAT thing he's doing for people in need around America! This is what "Love Thy Neighbor" is all about🇺🇸

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Spencer Pratt got 0 out of 24,000 votes in a late night LA ballot drop.

0/24,000

A guy getting around 30% support got 0 out of 24,000.

Astronomically small probability of happening.

Impossible.

California no longer even hides it.

Doors need to be kicked in.

[Lyndsey Fifield @lyndseyfifield]

I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists.

As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them.

But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed.

After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)?

Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate?

Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never).

Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal?

The editors said it was too much, they explained.

The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so.

It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life.

And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it.

Still fawning after all these years.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@NewsHour

[MSN @MSN1776]

@WMCActionNews5 Why does Memphis news report more on out of state news than what happens in state?

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

GB News' Patrick Christys calls out the utter hypocrisy from British leaders who knelt "in solidarity" for George Floyd but remain completely silent for the murder of Henry Nowak.

Nowak was stabbed in the chest by Vickrum Digwa. His last words were "I can't breathe."

"So far, we have had absolutely no remarks from Keir Starmer about Henry Nowak, a young boy who drowned in his own blood as British police officers handcuffed him because they thought that the big crime that had been committed that day was that he'd been racist, which was a lie," Christys said.

"Silence from the Prime Minister. Silence from pretty much all the politicians who stood up for BLM."

Infuriating.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@WMCActionNews5 Officials said? 🤡

Karmelo Anthony said he stabbed him!

[MSN @MSN1776]

@IgorIgall He never addressed the inbreeding. Just skipped right over that little nugget.

[MSN @MSN1776]

@InfoWars_tv @OwenShroyer1776 So you think all of MAGA is less intelligent than yourself? You sound like TDS sufferers.