MaSchella

I believe in #PLS #PLSX #HEX as a great opportunity to build our future and I am proud to be a part of this wonderful community

[SUPERHEXWIN @superhexwin]

@CoinMarketCap 👀 https://t.co/fPzsJwmy1w

[PulseChainStats.com | PulseChain Stats & Portfolio @PulseChainStats]

Both $PLSX and $PRVX are hyper-deflationary assets with active buy & burn mechanisms constantly removing user circulating supply from the market.

In just ~3 years, PulseX has already burned nearly 10% of the circulating supply.

Now imagine what happens once ProveX is fully released and real volume starts flowing through the protocol, triggering continuous token burns at scale 📈

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

PulseChain, PulseX, HEX, ProveX all have more potential for maximum gains than Bitcoin does, because BTC has a 1.6 Trillion dollar market cap already. It's been around for 17 years already. You are not an early adopter in $BTC.

Those 4 coins all do things that BTC can't.
PulseChain has better potential, better technology, higher throughput, lower fees, is more secure, and is less owned by governments and banks to boot.

HEX did a 10,000x in price in the last 10 years and doesn't make electricity companies and mining hardware manufacturers rich at the cost of the price.

PulseX removes middlemen from trading, its just you and the code.

ProveX uses zero knowledge tech to enable peer 2 peer trading and issue other kinds of proofs.

Better potential, better tech.

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

Windows users u must update! Bitlocker has an exploit that Microsoft has silently patched and released no notes about. That's how bad it is. I suggest you run windows update now.

P.S. They're called RedSun and YellowKey

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

Happy 3 years of flawless operation PulseChain!

[Alex McWhirter @SIN3R6Y]

Cappy early website is up: https://t.co/lnvhzelcDi
Cappy X account: @CappyWallet

Just wanted thank you guys for all the support on this. This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are a lot of things I plan to do in as short as possible of order. Couldn't do it without you guys.

I'll be splitting updates between my personal / Cappy X accounts. I've been asked many times how people can help, I put some info on the site for now.

Anyways, less talking more doing. The roadmap on the site is accurate as of right now. But I'm moving fast.

I want this wallet to exist so I can enjoy it too.

[Alex McWhirter @SIN3R6Y]

When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure.

Not hype.

Not another token.

Not another chart.

Infrastructure.

Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable.

PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one.

So that’s where I focused.

It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app.

But a lot of projects depend on it.

That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done.

At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces.

Software is like an onion.

There are layers upon layers.

Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks.

Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it.

And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them.

That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on.

That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases.

There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong.

But infrastructure has to be agnostic.

If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.”

That is not how we grow.

A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer.

That is not always easy.

But I think it matters.

And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things.

I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction.

But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that.

The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all.

If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better.

That is how this should work.

And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows.

That is how you grow.

That is how you get taken seriously as a chain.

In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong.

That is part of why I’m building Cappy.

If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions.

I am building the wallet I personally would want to use.

That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible.

There is no single perfect answer for everyone.

But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it.

A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really.

I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time.

Maybe I was wrong to expect that.

Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning.

Either way, it is what it is.

At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist.

That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else.

That is fine.

You can dislike the software I write and not use it.

It really is that simple.

But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important.

People ask, “What about Sigma?”

I am working on it in parallel with Cappy.

People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?”

I am working on it in parallel with Cappy.

People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?”

That is exactly the point.

These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch.

Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly.

And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them.

I am not randomly jumping between projects.

I am building the layers that make the next layer possible.

I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not.

What I do know is that I am at least decent at software.

So that is where I am putting my energy.

I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing.

Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No.

Do I respect what he has built? Yes.

Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes.

Those things can all be true at the same time.

I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from.

Many of you support me, and I see that.

I do not take it lightly.

All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can.

Not because everyone has to use it.

Not because I think I am the answer to every problem.

Not because I agree with every project.

But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces.

That is what I am trying to do.

Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

Another bridge hack. You should make sure your private keys stay private, or bad stuff happens.

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

PulseChain $PLS is superior software, with more security and functionality than $XRP, $DOGE, $ADA, $BCH, $XLM, $LTC. But all those are worth billions and billions. What's more likely, PLS moves up in rank or they move down?

With Ethereum $ETH as PulseChain's testnet, the security is so cozy.

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

yay

[Alex McWhirter @SIN3R6Y]

I've been working in silence for quite a while now. Tbh, I don't really even know where to start, so cue the rambling and ranting.

Regardless of which side of the fence you sit on, no one can argue the past few years haven't been politically and economically wild. For crypto as a whole it feels like a never ending game of tug of war.

A lot of X content has become toxic, so I just largely am not interacting these days. But I read, I read a lot of it. I think we like to forget history a bit in this community. $PLS launched off the highs, and the SEC swooped in right after.

Very few people want to admit it, but it shook confidence immediately. I mean no other crypto project has survived such a thing at the time. But #PLS $PLSX and $HEX did. However, winning doesn't unshake that confidence. And RH during and after that event took social precautions to protect himself and his creations.

Thing is, the guy isn't stupid. Someone once asked me if I thought certain aspects of the launch we rushed because he knew it was coming? And honestly, maybe. I'd attribute at least a non-zero probability to it. And If that were the case, im glad it was rushed. That case may have gone differently otherwise.

Do I still think #PulseChain, #HEX, etc... all have futures? Yes. RH has had the opportunity to just straight up bounce from all of this. Why hasn't he? You could point to exhibit A, B, C, D, etc... of how he's likely got the funds to do that and we all could relatively do nothing about it.

So why is he still around? I think it's pretty simple. The usual answer, he wants to win. It's in his twitter handle for Christs sakes. I'll go a step further and say he likely also wants us to win by extension, arguably not as much as he wins, but I mean that's pretty locked in at the moment 🤣

That's not to say he hasn't long been encumbered. And in that state, at lot has gone on without him. Much of which is / was bad. $pDAI guys... I pointed out from day one how building all this around a protocol in a dangerous state was a risky move. And I was right about that.... on multiple occasions... But does that matter now? I suppose not as much. In its current state, it's seemingly no longer exploitable. No different than a meme token now. (presumably, not like I have deep dove on any further risks since ESM). So I guess just whale risk mainly now?

Now a lot of people here are in the anti-pdai camp. Me too for what it's worth. But I don't care as much about it's negative anymore in its current state. A lot of people are still in the #pDAI camp strongly. We view this as tribalism, but it's important to note that makes all of us in the #PulseChain camp universally. So these day I find myself relatively pDAI neutral. If you guys want to send it to $1 do it. Only whales can stop you, they run out eventually. (insert super strong this is NOT financial advice). Hell you can maybe even use Sigma to help? Or maybe it wont help, idk. Depends on how people use the software.

Conversely, when looking at chain state overall... Why is there nearly $50M in stables sitting on the sidelines. Why not just bridge it out if you want out of what you think is a dead chain. Surely leaving it there exposes you to bridge risk? Why all these yield movements, why the $HEX dusts.... Something is happening. People are seemingly waiting to see what that something is. Or I am reading into things, NFA as always. This whole post is just ramblings of someone trying to do the best they can and certainly not any kind of advice.

When I look at other ecosystems, I see a level of polish we don't have. I see tooling we don't have, I see a fostered developer environment we don't have. So I've just been building it, painstakingly.... Because someone has to if we want to be taken seriously.

And what I've been building has allowed me to get Sigma to where it is. Sigma is so close... Really just in UI mode, performance optimization, going through nice to haves. I don't believe in launching in a non-finished immutable state. So yeah, I take my time. As with everything.

But my point with all of this, and the "why" #Sigma question.... It's unifying, anyone can participate. Which tribe you're in doesn't matter. And if you don't like it, don't use it. It's just software you can use or not use. As it should be.

The years of tooling work to deliver this has been a lot of work for one guy in silence. In that time AI has appeared. My take, every dev should be using it. Given the right direction and context. It will make you better. If you blindly trust it, it will make you worse. GPT 5.4 audits smart contracts better than most auditing services. Especially if you give it the context of what you are trying to do.

Anyways I digress, testnet is soon. Soon more meaning a feeling of near completion not always reality. That how software is. I do think Sigma stands to unify the chain in a common goal, and shift liquidity into more meaningful places, but ultimately it up to the people the decide to use the software or not use it.

And after these frameworks I've built will be applied to what I am tentatively calling the universal hex UI. More or less something aggregative of every derivative I can reasonably support. With data and analytics we since lost. So not just $HEX, $HDRN, and $ICSA, but others as well. However, that depends on some aspect of $Sigma to exist first, so sigma first, chain unity first.

And last but not least, take care of yourselves and strive to do cool things. If we aren't doing cool things then what's the point?

Hope you think my UI looks good, I spent a while on it.

/rant

[MaSchella @MaScheller]

@FitnessDadx Gut :-)

[Rampnow @OfficialRampnow]

Alright… this is a long one..

It’s finally done.
Yes - finally!!!!!!!!

From today, there are no barriers.
No matter where you are, you can now enter PulseChain.

We now support 40+ fiat currencies, covering the majority of global users.

And it’s not just cards or SEPA - we support local, preferred payment methods used by people in each region.

@PulseChain is now globally accessible.

🇦🇷 Argentina
🇦🇺 Australia
🇧🇬 Bulgaria
🇧🇷 Brazil
🇨🇭 Switzerland
🇨🇱 Chile
🇨🇴 Colombia
🇨🇿 Czech Republic
🇩🇰 Denmark
🇪🇺 Europe
🇦🇪 UAE
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🇭🇰 Hong Kong
🇭🇺 Hungary
🇮🇩 Indonesia
🇮🇱 Israel
🇮🇳 India
🇯🇵 Japan
🇰🇪 Kenya
🇰🇷 South Korea
🇲🇽 Mexico
🇳🇬 Nigeria
🇳🇴 Norway
🇳🇿 New Zealand
🇵🇪 Peru
🇵🇭 Philippines
🇵🇱 Poland
🇷🇴 Romania
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
🇸🇪 Sweden
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇹🇭 Thailand
🇹🇷 Turkey
🇺🇬 Uganda
🇺🇸 United States
🇻🇳 Vietnam
🇿🇦 South Africa

The access layer is complete 🤝
Now it’s in the hands of the community.
What’s stopping you from pushing PulseChain further?

Thanks to @plsfolio, @piteasio, @RichardHeartWin and @hexscout

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

I was here when Bitcoin dropped ~95%. I was here when Ethereum dropped ~95%. They went on to make new all time highs again and again.

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

PulseX v1.1.4 is out now & offers better rates for many things by routing through the ProveX liquidity. PRVX is added in the defaults

Shout out to https://t.co/JrKFXBv70N for showing that PulseX could improve its routing logic to give better rates, by going through ProveX pairs. Beware that searching piteas in some search engines gives a drainer (bad) as the first result.

Also a price chart has been added to https://t.co/AhLrK4RZhc

[Rampnow @OfficialRampnow]

⚠️ SCAM ALERT

Impersonators are falsely claiming to be Rampnow staff, moderators, or team members.

🚫 NEVER share your:
→ Order ID
→ Transaction details
→ Personal or payment info

RampNow ONLY communicates through our official domain. Any other contact is a scam.

Spotted a fake account?

Report it to us immediately via our official @OfficialRampnow and we'll take action.

Stay safe. Verify first. 🔒

#ScamAlert #CryptoSecurity #Rampnow

[Anndy Lian @anndylian]

Try to name a Layer 1 that's down 99% from its high, with a missing founder, but still has a super active community. 🤔

Hard, right? I've got one in mind.

[MaSchella @MaScheller]

😊👍

[Trezor @Trezor]

@khalidoncrypto @presidentpush We support Pulsechain on the device, but you need to use a third-party wallet app connected with Trezor to manage it✌️
https://t.co/UApF8WBAvt

[Rampnow @OfficialRampnow]

Can we bring back THIS energy?

The same vision, the same community, the same belief?
We're still here. HEX is still here. 💪
Who's ready to make it happen AGAIN?

Buy hex directly https://t.co/IV9e6BbzLu

@hexscout @CryptoCoffee369 @RichardHeartWin @CristinaHype @pulsechain

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

Richard Heart here to help protect you from scams you didn't know about, but millions are falling for.

Scammers can inject evil links into your "legitimate" SMS chats by setting up an evil cell tower in a city and blast out SMS impersonating FedEx, UPS, your credit card company. It's called "smishing".

Because SMS sucks, the phones are stupid enough to go ahead and send you the scam SMS in the same chat as your legit SMS were.

When you get a scam email, at least you can "inspect headers" and verify the email server that sent the mail is actually the registered server of a domain you trust. SMS has no "inspect headers" I'm aware of.

Apparently disabling 2G can help stop this particular scam. Or lockdown mode on Iphone.

TLDR; You can't trust that because a message or link is in a known good SMS chat, that it's not a scammer.